Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.5%

  • Total voters
    420
Is there anyone we know for sure was both present at the scene when the arrest occurred, who Rekieta has shit-talked either in public or in records?
Yes.

Sweep, the child protection lady who Nick stared into the camera and accused of perjury, was eventually called to the scene. There's at least one more person from child protection since the document dump says 2 of them need to be redacted in addition to the children. But the baseless perjury accusation was related to a later home visit the following Tuesday.

He also mocked the officer who handed him the warrant that he then petulantly threw on the ground, but didn't name the guy. That was more presenting him as a hapless foil to Rekieta's delusional self-conception as a lolbertarian badass, stunned into silence by Rekieta's lolbertarian badass-ery when he bravely said their probable cause was "bullshit".

Bottom line: Rekieta W. It's not gonna happen.

It's clear from the initial emails that they initially intended to fulfill the requests, though. Consolation prize would be to request the documents where Nick/Nick's counsel successfully prevented the release of the footage.
The reason Nick started bringing up the footage out of nowhere is probably because he got firm confirmation that nothing was going to be released.
 
He has repeatedly stated the bodycam footage would (1) exonerate him, and (2) would come out eventually, so the struggle makes it funnier.
He's just a liar, though. It's funny the first few times you see the obvious lies, but eventually it's just annoying and stops people from caring or taking him seriously at all. It's the boy who cried wolf, except with Rekieta it's the non-practicing lawyer who cried he's innocent.
 
Is there anyone we know for sure was both present at the scene when the arrest occurred, who Rekieta has shit-talked either in public or in records?
I'm being autistic here but could the names of all individuals involved during the search/arrest be revealed through a FOIA to make sure that there is no other individual that has been revealed thus far?
 
In what universe would anyone ever want thousands of slack-jawed rubberneckers watching their humiliating arrest for coked-up child neglect? Of course he doesn't want it released, nobody would.
You’re right, nobody would. And Nick doesn’t more than most, because he knows it will be utterly shameful. But Nick is determined to maintain a narrative that everything was perfectly fine and respectable, that there was something shady about how the police conducted the raid, and that as a professional lawyer and holder of government to account, he would of course release everything in the name of transparency if it was up to him!

So I mean we only want to take him at his word.
 
Ya know, if Nick were smart and was actually a professional grifter, he would realize that the footage is almost certainly gunna find its way into the public eye, so instead of trying to delay the inevitable, he should find a way to get the footage before everyone else and just live stream his own felting so he can get one last grift and maybe a last sad W.
 
Last edited:
He's just a liar, though. It's funny the first few times you see the obvious lies, but eventually it's just annoying and stops people from caring or taking him seriously at all. It's the boy who cried wolf, except with Rekieta it's the non-practicing lawyer who cried he's innocent.
His statements aren't for us

He knows most people will never believe his obvious lies, so he doesn't bother, all his lies are for his sycophants and himself who will believe them
 
Last edited:
In what universe would anyone ever want thousands of slack-jawed rubberneckers watching their humiliating arrest for coked-up child neglect? Of course he doesn't want it released, nobody would
someone innocent (as rekieta-chu has said he is) would. Someone claiming that the kandiyohi county gubment is running gay ops on them to silence their freedom of speech would claw tooth and nail to exonnerate themselves with video evidence.

Unfortunately, balldo'd shit is retarded, he talks like a fag, and hes all fucked up.
 
Is there anyone we know for sure was both present at the scene when the arrest occurred, who Rekieta has shit-talked either in public or in records?
Joshua Moonson? The cop who pulled him over was also involved in the search. He’s the one who said “YOU ARE BULLSHIT LYING” when he pulled Rekieta for speeding.
 
Ya know, if Nick was smart and was actually a professional grifter, he would realize that the footage is almost certainly gunna find its way into the public eye, so instead of trying to delay the inevitable, he should just find a way to get the footage before everyone else and just live stream his own felting so he can get one last grift and maybe a last sad W.
He could watermark it, put himself over the footage or release it behind a paywall but he'll never do anything like that because it destroys his narrative completely
 
Rekieta is also trying to get the bodycam footage entirely thrown out as evidence using a fruit of the poison tree argument. He really, really, really, really does not want this footage public.
He kind of has to win the constitutional argument in the first place. I won't say it's absolutely impossible, because it's possible the state fucked up executing the warrant in some way that we don't know, but I see nothing wrong with the warrant. It more than adequately states probable cause, with the cherry on top of the shit sundae being Nick's own deranged cokestream.

On top of that, nobody who is claiming there's something wrong with the warrant itself have provided any kind of basis for it other than "muh ebil gummint."

Considering there are multiple bodycams, if there's anything unconstitutional, it would be in that very footage. I doubt the police would be so eager to get this into evidence if it showed police misconduct (that would also give cause to a § 1983 lawsuit). You'd think Nick would be eager to get proof of police misconduct into evidence.

The reason he doesn't want it in is obvious. Because he and his whores were living in squalor like the filthy drug fiends they are, just as the police and others who have been in Casa Rackets have said.
 
Last edited:
URGENT: Please provide me (email, private message, profile post, quote this, whatever) evidence of Rekieta alleging conspiracy by gov't employees or agents against him.
This is the most recent thing I can remember off the top of my head:

Rekieta: "You know what's interesting is that you may not know what's in your house."

Chrissie: "Oh-ho. that's why you got to do a spring cleaning, um—"

Rekieta: "You may not know what cops bring into your house either."

Chrissie: "You think cops brought stuff into your house?"

Rekieta: "I didn't say that."

I know Barnes has said some on-the-nose conspiracy things, but that's not Rekieta himself saying it.
 
Back