why do documentaries about evil people feel the need to repeatedly call them evil

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6

trust the plan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
I saw this post but I don't feel like shitting up their thread
I look forward to the EWU video on this, even if their scriptwriter is a fucking faggot and overuses terms like "SHOCKING" and "HEINOUS" and so forth.
and I am mad at documentaries. Why do documentaryfags feel the need to hammer on the point that the person they're talking about is an evil person? Do they think I'm too retarded to realize that the person who murdered someone "ironically" wasn't a likable person? I'm tired of watching normalfag internet drama videos and having the person in question referred to as evil at every opportunity. I'm tired of watching some true crime documentary and having the retard who murdered some old lady continuously referred to as evil. I'm tired of seeing Nazi documentaries a-log Hitler every 30 seconds. I know murdering people is bad and that Hitler could be a bit of a jerk to certain people but I don't need to hear about it all the fucking time. Is it taught in journoid schools to fill up as much time as possible with useless shit in your documentary?
 
This is something that's bothered me too. It's not even just serial killers, they do it with historical shit too, I watched a fucking BBC documentary about Ghengis Khan and it was like "THE BLOOD SOAKED LEADER OF THE MONGOLS" every other sentence.

I swear older documentaries weren't like this, you watch ones on the nazis from like the 70's and they're much better presented. I feel like it's because they're trying to appeal to a retarded audience used to sensationalism.
 
Because retards online will bitch about how the documentary was unsympathetic to the victims of the person, and claim it’s insensitive and exploitive to [[insert historically oppressed group here]].
 
  • Like
Reactions: parsnip
Because retards online will bitch about how the documentary was unsympathetic to the victims of the person, and claim it’s insensitive and exploitive to [[insert historically oppressed group here]].
I think this is it. I've seen it a lot with true crime. They present the killer as though they never did a kind thing in their entire lives, and the victim as though they were an angel on earth. To some people humanizing a "bad guy" is basically supporting them.
 
I think this is it. I've seen it a lot with true crime. They present the killer as though they never did a kind thing in their entire lives, and the victim as though they were an angel on earth. To some people humanizing a "bad guy" is basically supporting them.
If they're a capital murderer, there's nothing to humanize about them. Anything "nice" they did was solely for malevolent purposes anyways.
 
Because everyone in writing school is basically told "more descriptive = more better" so they instinctively throw in unnecessary adjectives wherever they can.
It's really that simple.
 
Back