Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.8%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.7%

  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.5%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 164 34.3%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 118 24.7%
  • Total voters
    478
Useful_Mistake said:
Nope. He has not responded to docket number 68, and the Magistrate explicitly ordered him to do so. So he's missing one.
Click to expand...
I wonder how long it'll take for the judge to notice.

Y'know what? I don't think Hardin should point that out unless absolutely necessary. Let the court be as inconvenienced by Greer as Null is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill Evans 45, koos koets, murph and 1 other person
BULLY HUNTER_78 said:
Maybe the Judge should just cut to the chase and write baby’s filing for him. It’d save everyone time.
Click to expand...
"Man this fella makes some good points, somebody should make him a judge or something."

We're far enough down the legal rabbit hole that it genuinely would not surprise me if the Judge just says that Russ's other filings are good enough to construe what he would have said in his response to the one he's missing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: murph, Third World Aristocrat, Botchy Galoop and 5 others
Can legal kiwis tell me if this is an actual tort:

1722999393481.png

What is 'defamation of copyright'?


Also, this is a strange name for a judge:

1722999731563.png
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: rubytintedchix, N Space, BBChannel and 16 others
The farms is built on retards thinking they can post stuff publicly, yet be entirely immune to criticism.
image-000002.png

Russ is just defaulting to the standard tard position.

To state the bleedin' obvious, it's so obviously dumb but unfortunately it's convenient for TPTB to collude with the tards, make concerned noises about cyberbullying as they ratchet down freedom of expression.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: CEO of Gay, ConSluttant, Pee Cola and 9 others
Himedall All-seeing Waifu said:
Can legal kiwis tell me if this is an actual tort:

What is 'defamation of copyright'?
Click to expand...
He might mean "injurious falsehood"

"One such tort is called by various names such as 'disparagement of property,' 'slander of goods,' 'commercial disparagement,' and 'trade libel.' The tort is 'now generally referred to as `injurious falsehood.' " Bankwest v. Fidelity Deposit Co., Maryland, 63 F.3d 974 (10th Cir. 1995) "Under Utah law, injurious falsehood combines the two related torts of slander of title and trade libel. To establish a claim for injurious falsehood, plaintiff 'must prove falsity of the statements made, malice, and special damages.' [...] As to the first element of an injurious falsehood claim, although some courts have interpreted the tort more broadly, to be actionable under Utah law, the false statements must either disparage plaintiff's title or the quality of plaintiff's product." IHC Health Servs. Inc. v. ELAP Servs., LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-01245-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Sep. 28, 2018)
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: CEO of Gay, TurboNAS, Harvey Danger and 9 others
If only his strip mall college could retroactively rescind his paralegal degree for these filings. He essentially submitted unfiltered drool, and not even enough of it to cover everything he was supposed to respond to, and not in a timely fashion, either. Any reputable school would be embarrassed to have certified his non-existent skills.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Pedophobe, Pee Cola, Broken Cuddles and 8 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Nope. He has not responded to docket number 68, and the Magistrate explicitly ordered him to do so. So he's missing one.
Click to expand...
68 is just the motion to intervene, which would basically just strike "Kiwi Farms, a website" off because it's not a valid legal entity and substitute in Lolcow, LLC as a defendant instead. I can't really even think of any reason why Russ should even want to oppose it, other than just to be contrary.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola, Marvin, UncleTusky and 6 others
Useful_Mistake said:
He might mean "injurious falsehood"

"One such tort is called by various names such as 'disparagement of property,' 'slander of goods,' 'commercial disparagement,' and 'trade libel.' The tort is 'now generally referred to as `injurious falsehood.' " Bankwest v. Fidelity Deposit Co., Maryland, 63 F.3d 974 (10th Cir. 1995) "Under Utah law, injurious falsehood combines the two related torts of slander of title and trade libel. To establish a claim for injurious falsehood, plaintiff 'must prove falsity of the statements made, malice, and special damages.' [...] As to the first element of an injurious falsehood claim, although some courts have interpreted the tort more broadly, to be actionable under Utah law, the false statements must either disparage plaintiff's title or the quality of plaintiff's product." IHC Health Servs. Inc. v. ELAP Servs., LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-01245-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Sep. 28, 2018)
Click to expand...

Tsk! Tsk! Falling into the same trap as the judge in this case and becoming the plaintiff's lawyer/advocate. This might be an ethics violation due to conflict of interest, Mr. Hardin... People like you are why Russhole gets to ECKSPHLAIN!

Jokes aside, thank-you for making something sensible out of Greer's nonsense.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: ShinyStar, Pee Cola, UncleTusky and 10 others
Useful_Mistake said:
I double checked with the clerk, and I was informed that everything he has emailed them has been filed already. Effectively, I guess he just chose to not respond to one of Null's motions
Click to expand...
Assuming an unbiased judge (I know, I know) what are the possible consequences for Russhole in ignoring the motion? Does this mean it's automatically granted as unopposed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleTusky, Not a bee, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back