Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[ghastlyretard]

lenient on first time offenders

So you're saying we get a whole other lose-the-kids-get-caught-with-cocaine-and-4-unpaid-speeding-tickets arc, and that time it's the director's cut ending?

 

[Captain Manning]

MN prosecution has a slam dunk case I don't know why they'd agree to either a plea or an Alford.

Because Minnesota state policy is to be lenient on first time offenders and drugs in particular, and courts prefer diversion to treatment over punishment.

Just to be clear here...

There are two different things raised in Telvanni's post. A plea deal, and an Alford plea.

I think they will offer him a plea deal. There's a very well established logic behind them doing that.

I see absolutely no reason why they would need or want to offer him an Alford plea.

If he insist on an Alford plea, and they give it to him, the State of Minnesota are cucks. Shame on them.

Even then, an Alford plea would also still be an L for him, but just less of an L that he could wave around to help him cope.

 

[AnOminous]

He's not giving up the Qover that easily.

It's probably ultimately not up to him. A retarded cuck polycule of a malignant narcissist and two cracked out BPD whores is not going to end well.

 

[Sulla]

Supposing Rekieta does get away with it and gets an ideal plea deal.

Dudes a hardcore addict, there is a 0% chance he doesn't just get caught again anyway in even worse circumstances.

 

[Paige Matheson]

Maybe the kid of his that had the hair test done that showed outrageous levels of coke metabolites was a lab mistake and he’s getting his kids back?

 

[Imperial Citizen]

Supposing Rekieta does get away with it and gets an ideal plea deal.

Dudes a hardcore addict, there is a 0% chance he doesn't just get caught again anyway in even worse circumstances.

That’s where you’re wrong, you Scandinavian incel prude. There is a thing that will stop the government in its tracks. Double Jeopardy!

Rekeita can’t be arrested under false, conspiratorial charges of cocaine possession a second time.

 

[squirrely dan]

Supposing Rekieta does get away with it and gets an ideal plea deal.

Dudes a hardcore addict, there is a 0% chance he doesn't just get caught again anyway in even worse circumstances.

I mean, having one of his kids test positive for fucking cocaine is already pretty fucking bad. I cannot imagine how this could get any worse.

Then again, I am only halfway through the OPs and I am absolutely flabbergasted with what he got away with already, so we shall wait and see I guess.

 

[ghastlyretard]

Could the more lawyerly among you tell me the difference between an alford plea and nolo contendere? It almost seems like an Alford plea would be in defiance of the system when they so much evidence and they'd give a harsher sentence. My only experience is with a small town judge where I actually had to describe the idea of pleading no contest, which was something a court clerk friend told me about.

And even if Nick does get some kind of plea deal, wouldn't they have the ability to stipulate he has to do random drug testing for some period of time?

Edit: I'm thinking about it. Is an Alford plea strategically a no contest but with the ability to come back later on appeal or something after being able to show that the evidence that would have been presented was inadmissible maybe?

 

[Major]

Yes. When the public degeneracy was really gaining momentum in late 2022, Kayla developed a new life goal:

View attachment 6283576

Note that Nick has an idea where this new goal came from.

bisexual women are always mentally unstable. Case in point.

 

[Captain Manning]

That’s where you’re wrong, you Scandinavian incel prude. There is a thing that will stop the government in its tracks. Double Jeopardy!

Rekeita can’t be arrested under false, conspiratorial charges of cocaine possession a second time.

That argument is so dumb...

...that I could totally see somebody like Barnes making it.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

90% likely he's getting his kids back. (Don't know why he'd be excited, all that driving and looking after them an everything which he hates)

Because it was never about his kids. It was about Nick being able to get away with doing whatever the fuck he wants and rub it in everyone’s face.

 

[TexOffender]

Yes. When the public degeneracy was really gaining momentum in late 2022, Kayla developed a new life goal:

View attachment 6283576

Note that Nick has an idea where this new goal came from.

Fag hags always end up being bisexuals that lean more toward women and only get with men when they want stability.

Wonder how many other "gay friends" she had in college besides Nick.

 

[Telvanni]

Just to be clear here...

There are two different things raised in Telvanni's post. A plea deal, and an Alford plea.

I think they will offer him a plea deal. There's a very well established logic behind them doing that.

I see absolutely no reason why they would need or want to offer him an Alford plea.

If he insist on an Alford plea, and they give it to him, the State of Minnesota are cucks. Shame on them.

Even then, an Alford plea would also still be an L for him, but just less of an L that he could wave around to help him cope.

He fails to realize that if by some miracle he Saul Goodman's his way out, he's guilty through public opinion to the highest degree.
He will try to Ralphasplain as well by saying "I pleaded no contest I'm not guilty!"

 

[Angry Shoes]

Actual picture of me waiting for a MNPublicRecord post

 

[Botchy Galoop]

Maybe the kid of his that had the hair test done that showed outrageous levels of coke metabolites was a lab mistake and he’s getting his kids back?

For the sake of the child that tested positive for cocaine metabolites, I can only hope that this is true. Punishing Nick for being a shit human is one thing, punishing the children for having shit parents is quite another.

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

“My schedule unexpectedly got filled in the best way!”

If that means he has custody, he’s going to celebrate reuniting with his children at last by… holing himself up in the basement and gloating to the Internet?

Father of the year right here.

It's important for the dignity of the children that he "maintain his standing on youtube" and "stunt on them farmers."

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Plea deal is lot less work. And with right conditions it is probably close enough to actual trial sentence. Like multiple years of drug testing and being clean in general.

And you don't have to deal with all of the chaos around this thing. I mean, Rekieta is most definitely not an important person, but the 'tism-turbo-charged attention from those (I count all of us here, whether ackshually or merely associatively autistic, pro (ha ha ha) or anti, among that group, along with all the online commentators, etc.) with a particular interest in his particular crimes, has to be a headache for them.

Sad!, you'd think Willmar would welcome some tourism and a bit of the limelight, even if for awkward reasons. Those Scando prudes just may not know how to have fun, after all. :-(

But I expect maybe the CPS thing went very well.

How does this dumb fuck still have a driver's license? I thought unpaid moving violations eventually resulted in license suspension (at least eventually). That and the total number he's racked up. Three tickets in just a few months? Minnesota is either very forgiving or very incompetent.

It takes a long time and a lot of them. And it's not as though someone shows up at your door to seize it. You probably find out the next time you get pulled over* or when you go in to try to renew.

*and no they don't haul you in then or take your car - you just get another ticket (for driving with a suspended license) on top of what you got pulled over for [ymmv if you have an outstanding felony charge, idk].

At any rate, you can still drive, you're just not doing so legally.

Also, noting it has "gone to Collections" doesn't necessarily mean you start getting hounded.

But it is expensive when you finally decide to pay your past tickets so you can get a valid license.

They'll just levy his bank account (and then charge him for that too).

Idk if that kicks in once you hit a certain threshold of amount owed for tickets, or whether it's reserved for certain types of tickets, but even after suspension for nonpayment of tickets/fines, it's not a given and not fast.

rekeita being retarded about his parking ticket reminds me I really gotta get started with defensive driving.

All driving should be defensive driving!

Could the more lawyerly among you tell me the difference between an alford plea and nolo contendere? It almost seems like an Alford plea would be in defiance of the system when they so much evidence and they'd give a harsher sentence. My only experience is with a small town judge where I actually had to describe the idea of pleading no contest, which was something a court clerk friend told me about.

And even if Nick does get some kind of plea deal, wouldn't they have the ability to stipulate he has to do random drug testing for some period of time?

Edit: I'm thinking about it. Is an Alford plea strategically a no contest but with the ability to come back later on appeal or something after being able to show that the evidence that would have been presented was inadmissible maybe?

"The main difference between a nolo contendere plea and an Alford plea is that, in an Alford plea, the defendant formally pleads guilty while, in a nolo contendere plea, the defendant refuses to assert either guilt or innocence."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/alford_plea

 

[AnOminous]

Could the more lawyerly among you tell me the difference between an alford plea and nolo contendere? It almost seems like an Alford plea would be in defiance of the system when they so much evidence and they'd give a harsher sentence.

If the court elects to accept it (where it is discretionary), it's functionally equivalent to a guilty plea and can (subject to wildly varying rules state by state) be used as evidence in civil proceedings. There is no (U.S. constitution) right to an Alford plea, barring state laws or rules to the contrary, and some states outright prohibit them.

A nolo plea similarly is not recognized by all states (although it is at the federal level), and unlike the Alford plea, where the defendant pleads guilty but while maintaining innocence, the defendant maintains no claim as to guilt or innocence. Also, the plea cannot be used as proof of criminality in a civil case involving the same facts.

Note that these pleas aren't available everywhere, and even where they are, this summary might not be accurate about every state. You'd really need a 50 state survey for a full explanation of how it goes.

If an Alford plea is part of a plea bargain, though, generally much as with a normal guilty plea, you're getting cut a deal on it. The only time you might provoke the prosecution with one is if you're somewhere the prosecution doesn't have the option of blocking it. It's generally the defense who would try for an Alford plea, because the prosecution, all other things being equal, would prefer an actual guilty plea.

Edit: I'm thinking about it. Is an Alford plea strategically a no contest but with the ability to come back later on appeal or something after being able to show that the evidence that would have been presented was inadmissible maybe?

No, since it's functionally an admission of guilt, there are very few ways of appealing it, mostly limited to whether you entered into it knowingly and voluntarily.

*and no they don't haul you in then or take your car - you just get another ticket (for driving with a suspended license) on top of what you got pulled over for [ymmv if you have an outstanding felony charge, idk].

I wouldn't bet on that in a small town. Some places I've lived they had an annual mop-up where they just spent a week rounding up the local traffic deadbeats and dragged them to jail where they stayed until they coughed it up or made arrangements to do it.

 

[Captain Manning]

View attachment 6283970
Actual picture of me waiting for a MNPublicRecord post

*Nick starts his stream*

"Sorry Kiwifags, I wi..."

*Wall explodes behind Nick*

INTERESTING NEW MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD ATTACHED!!!!

"Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu...."

 

[Sir Baz the Intolerant]

Supposing Rekieta does get away with it and gets an ideal plea deal.

Dudes a hardcore addict, there is a 0% chance he doesn't just get caught again anyway in even worse circumstances.

Not only is he an addict, he's a narcissist as well, which means that he won't view a plea deal as either a lucky escape nor a second chance to turn things around. Instead he'll very quickly convince himself that due to his own brilliance, that it was he, Nicholas Robert Rekieta lawyer extraordinaire that forced the State of Minnesota to offer him a plea deal to save face from the public scandal that he would doubtlessly inflict upon them in court.

All this will do is feed his ego and entrench him even further in the path that he's in, so much so that I fully expect him to go even harder on the gear almost immediately, and to be more open with it too, because sure if he could beat the state once, then of course he'll be able to do it again. How? Because he's Nick Rekieta and fuck you, that's how.