Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 14.1%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.9%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.6%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 160 34.1%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 114 24.3%

  • Total voters
    469
Are you sure? Because I'm pretty sure shitlips INTENDED to oppose it, which is all that really matters.
The court will approve the motion. Then Greer will complain that he didn't understand and his research said it would be automatically denied so he saw no need to oppose it and now he'd like to object.
And then the court will grant him 30 days to object, and then extend that 2 more times.
 
Are you sure? Because I'm pretty sure shitlips INTENDED to oppose it, which is all that really matters.

Mr. Greer didn't oppose motion to intervene/ substitute/ correct name, but he INTENDED to oppose it. At the same time, Defendant is a mean person, who owns a harm website. Thus, Defendant motion is DENIED.

In summary, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

  1. Defendants' motion to intervene/ substitute/ correct name is DENIED.
  2. Joshua Moon is declared a mean person.
  3. Kiwi farms, a website, is declared HARM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
 
If only his strip mall college could retroactively rescind his paralegal degree for these filings. (....) Any reputable school would be embarrassed to have certified his non-existent skills.
That assumes the school is anything more than a diploma mill.

I guess he just chose to not respond to one of Null's motions
Whether RG's lack of response is accidental or deliberate, it's par for the course in that there's no logic in what, how, or when the responses are written. Even if one assumes the worst-case scenario will happen, it will still be interesting to read any rebuttal from Hardin and the subsequent ruling on the latest batch of motions.
:popcorn:
 
If only his strip mall college could retroactively rescind his paralegal degree for these filings. He essentially submitted unfiltered drool, and not even enough of it to cover everything he was supposed to respond to, and not in a timely fashion, either. Any reputable school would be embarrassed to have certified his non-existent skills.
That assumes the school is anything more than a diploma mill.
LDS business college is pretty reputable. The issue is that Russ is exceptional and took 5 years to finish a 2 year program.
 
If only his strip mall college could retroactively rescind his paralegal degree for these filings. He essentially submitted unfiltered drool, and not even enough of it to cover everything he was supposed to respond to, and not in a timely fashion, either. Any reputable school would be embarrassed to have certified his non-existent skills.
He took five years to finish a two year paralegal degree. Part of the reason it took so long is he took semesters off to earn money to spend on hookers. The other part is he was just that bad a student. Russ's former classmates confirmed the school more or less handwaved him through just to be rid of him.

Edit: partly ninja'd by @Gorton Colu
 
View attachment 6280681
Every other time the judge cut him slack by giving him what he supposedly meant to ask for, it was because he's a poor pro se know nothing, but now he's trying to get that same slack for what his actual lawyers argued and I really don't think that's going to happen
"My lawyers meant to appeal that, they jus ran outta paper yuh honah. Cause they dumb as heyll."
"Motion granted."
 
Did you think no rights was a fucking hyperbole?
You don't have the same constitutional safeguards in a civil trial as you do in a criminal trial. To be found guilty in a criminal trial the state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt (about 95% certainty). To be found culpable in a civil trial requires only a preponderance of the evidence (theoretically over 50% certainty). Any attorney would know this.
 
You don't have the same constitutional safeguards in a civil trial as you do in a criminal trial. To be found guilty in a criminal trial the state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt (about 95% certainty). To be found culpable in a civil trial requires only a preponderance of the evidence (theoretically over 50% certainty). Any attorney would know this.
do you actually think he doesn't understand that, or are you just supremely autistic?
 
You don't have the same constitutional safeguards in a civil trial as you do in a criminal trial. To be found guilty in a criminal trial the state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt (about 95% certainty). To be found culpable in a civil trial requires only a preponderance of the evidence (theoretically over 50% certainty). Any attorney would know this.
Yes, did you think that no rights was a hyperbole?
 
You've been stating repeatedly that the system was intentionally stacked against you in favor of Greer. So no, I am not inclined to believe that you were saying this in jest.
My Faggot in Sneed, have we been following the same legal action?

While the Court is supposed to liberally construe the filings of a pro se plantiff, the Court has gone above and beyond this, even granting Russ things he needed for this to work, but did not ask for. We can only infer, based on the fact that this hasnt happened in any other case that I can see, that yes, the Court is at best, stacked against Null, or that every single individual in the judiciary branch there is fucking short bus retarded. I’m not sure that option C, both, isn’t in play.

Edit: Legal Kiwis, as usual, inform me if I am retarded myself.
 
If only his strip mall college could retroactively rescind his paralegal degree for these filings.
All anyone would have to do is send Ensign (formerly LDS Business) College the parts of his books where he openly brags about fucking hookers while attending a religious school. They'd probably rescind it just for that.

He even said he knew he could get kicked out of school for it but did it anyway. BYU fines female students just for wearing bluejeans.
 
Holy shit I read these briefs and they are terrible. Like drooling retard terrible. Like OMG how are these written by a human being bad.

So if the court accepts these at face value I think Null should just give up. He ain't gonna get justice when the system is setting out to fuck him over no matter what. If the judge just looks at these...things and goes "yup OK this will work" I feel there is no chance of justice nor of winning and the worst part is that appealing will only send Josh back to the fucking 10th circuit which we know is fucked and out to get him. Just give Russtard the very minimum you can and just move forward from there..if you even can go forward with a precedent like this set.

Where can you turn for justice when the justice system itself is against you? You might appeal but chances are low the SCotUS takes it up even if the 10th makes these fucking retarded rulings so your screwed there too.

You got my feels Null, I wish there was something you could do but it sure looks like your fucked no matter what you do just because the courts hate you for running the Farm.
 
Back