Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.8%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.7%

  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.5%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 164 34.4%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 117 24.5%
  • Total voters
    477
Debbie Macomber said:
when Russ does want to bring the case again, surprise! As previously mentioned, the statute of limitations has passed so he can't bring the case again!
Click to expand...
Funny you expect the courts to give a fuck about something like the statute of limitations now, after all the bullshit we've already seen happen.

Russ will come back 10 years later and cry that he just needs to explain how he was unjustly bamboozled by the oncologically evil Khhhkhiwi Fawwms and their shyster lawyer and his copyright is still being violated (as he will still not have DMCA'd Google to remove the file hosted on Drive) and Null will get sentenced to quantum superdeath.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SCV, Pee Cola, CEO of Gay and 5 others
Russ has literally everything going for him. The court is advocating and granting every thing it can. The fact that this still may be dismissed due to failure to prosecute is a testament to the legal expertise of Greer. It really doesn't matter how bad a job he does, the court will take his side. Yet his refusal to file anything of substance is literally snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Cow hall of fame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Pee Cola, The Un-Clit and 8 others
Null doesn't have those rights because he is in a civil court
Null said:
I mean I have no leg to stand on. I don't even have a right to a speedy trial. I have no rights whatsoever. He has a right to sue, for free, at no personal expense, and the judges are willing to give him anything he asks for, and I have no rights.
Click to expand...
That's because the right to a speedy trial applies in criminal court, not civil court.
 
  • Dumb
  • Late
Reactions: ConSluttant, The Un-Clit, Null and 1 other person
Smicneibn said:
Null doesn't have those rights because he is in a civil court

That's because the right to a speedy trial applies in criminal court, not civil court.
Click to expand...
Are you kidding? That is a long forgotten concept. You will wait as long as they tell you, then you'll wait a little longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat, Marsh Rabbit, UselessRubberKeyboard and 1 other person
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme and Not a bee
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
That’s the fun thing about LLCs, they HAVE to be defended by a lawyer (and iirc even if YOU are a lawyer you can’t defend your LLC).
Click to expand...
Actually you can as a general rule but there are some situations where it might raise conflicts of interest or other ethical issues, i.e. you representing an LLC against a shareholder derivative suit where you personally are accused of wrongdoing might raise such an issue.

This doesn't mean it's necessarily a good idea to do that, for the same reason as you usually shouldn't represent yourself.
Smicneibn said:
In a criminal court you can lose your liberties (prison) or even your life (death penalty). In a civil trial you can only lose a sum of money.
Click to expand...
To avail yourself of the right to a speedy trial you actually have to demand it. The vast majority of criminal cases you see limping along for years without a trial are because it is the defendant dragging his or her heels, like the Mercedes Carrere child molestation case.

Civil cases don't have this but you do have due process rights to a certain extent to have things decided, although except where there are statutes or rules specifying a hard deadline, it's still usually up to the judge. In extreme cases, you can file for a writ to hasten things along, in the nature of an old prerogative writ like procedendo (ordering the lower court to come to a judgment) or mandamus or probably a couple other weirdo writs with weird names.

If you poke a judge to get a faster ruling you might not like it, though, so people usually put up with this kind of nonsense, sometimes for years.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: rubytintedchix, Third World Aristocrat, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 10 others
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: TooManyKittens, Pee Cola, murph and 5 others
BULLY HUNTER_78 said:
Every time I’m reminded this man literally wrote an entire book about how he’s a vexatious litigant, I also remember how literally every other case he’s filed has failed to make it this far.
Click to expand...
To be fair, back then he was suing celebrities and women (and celebrity women), not the doughy owner of a literal internet hate machine.
 
Is there another case out there that has taken such a long time with no real progress being made? Greer v. Moon probably is unironically setting precedent in the sense that this case may be looked at in the future in how not to expedite the judicial process.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: PermaLurker69 and Mankirk
AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed said:
Is there another case out there that has taken such a long time with no real progress being made? Greer v. Moon probably is unironically setting precedent in the sense that this case may be looked at in the future in how not to expedite the judicial process.
Click to expand...
you're on some next level xxxl dragon fart copium if you think that things ever get better or that this case in particular is going to make anything better for anyone. it's called an age of decline for a reason.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: JustTheFaxcts, AStupidMonkey, BULLY HUNTER_78 and 14 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back