US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
The Dems are stuck between a rock and a hard place. After the catastrophic debate with Biden, the Dems really need a good debate performance and it looks bad if they weasel out of one. On the other hand, though, Kamala is a dumb, unlikable harpy, and that side of her will come out at full force in a potential debate with Trump, no question.
IMO Kamala's biggest issue is she feels like she is owed the nomination and the election. The cackling is forgivable, but the arrogance is not. If she stopped acting so fucking entitled, it would go a long way.
 
That's interesting, because the most effective attack they have found is non-specific and easy to flip around if allowed rebuttal. Makes a certain amount of sense, it's not specific or vitriolic enough to attract scrutiny, so nobody really feels queasy repeating it.
I mean, if you don't like a politician, then you don't like him. I'm gonna disagree with them and say why, but I also understand that no politician gives a shit if you live or die, so I'm not gonna end our friendship over it.

In this age of loneliness, people who have your back IRL are worth more than gold.
 
Last edited:
Do you really need an AI detector to tell that crowd is at least partly fake? I'm not saying that because they're supposed to be for Kamala, it's just obvious looking at it.
As a practicing Stable Diffusion enjoyer I cannot believe they're pulling this shit. Maybe not the campaign itself, but anyone in general. I haven't seen the original picture in full, but I'm sure I could pick out the errors by eye.
 
As a practicing Stable Diffusion enjoyer I cannot believe they're pulling this shit. Maybe not the campaign itself, but anyone in general. I haven't seen the original picture in full, but I'm sure I could pick out the errors by eye.
I distinctly remember them fretting about AI posing a "misinformation" threat to Our Democracy™️.

When they're denying it or shitting bricks about it, they're tipping their hand.
 
Warning: Autistic 90' Simpsons references ahead.

I can see Kamala doing 1 of 2 things:

1) She pulls a Barney "lets fly the rocketship into the whitehouse and kill the president" Gumble and when she tastes her first bottle of wine (non-alcoholic champagne), shouts "It begins", grabs a jetpack and exclaims "Trump-a-la-dump-a-doo" and flies into the distance.
[REF: Deep space Homer. Season 5, Episode 15]

or

2) Pulls a Mo "Your sodie is so cold it makes your teeth hurt, huh? WELL TOO FREAKING BAD!" Szyslak and has a complete meltdown on the campaign trail and screams at all of the kids that Walz is luring into his gingerbread house.
[REF: Bart sells his soul. Season 7, Episode 4]
Soulful, but extremely autistic.
 
As a practicing Stable Diffusion enjoyer I cannot believe they're pulling this shit. Maybe not the campaign itself, but anyone in general. I haven't seen the original picture in full, but I'm sure I could pick out the errors by eye.
The people this is targeting also believe Kamala raised $300 million on her first day and is leading Trump by 8pts.
 
Nigger, that’s every state. Even red states have blue cities. That doesn’t explain why Minnesota has been pozzed longer than basically every state in the country aside from Vermont and Hawaii I guess?
Because liberal democracies are actually pretty good and can function well if you're 95% high trust white, but the moment you add brown to the mix it quickly breaks down. One "sexual awakening" and import of browns later and the virtuous ideals of liberty are contorted into protections for criminals, abusers, retards, and parasites. Minnesota has been the way its been for a long time because it was full of scandinavians and so there was little to no consequence.
 
IMO Kamala's biggest issue is she feels like she is owed the nomination and the election. The cackling is forgivable, but the arrogance is not. If she stopped acting so fucking entitled, it would go a long way.
That was one of the attributes that made Hillary Clinton so off-putting. I’m sure it’ll be a winning strategy for CumAllah, though!
 
Well, the optics of her telling protesters at her own rally to "shut up or let Trump win" are not great, and that's putting it mildly. She might have seriously torpedo'd her chances at winning Michigan with that "girl boss" and "brat" shit. lol. All Trump needs to do is to hold a rally in Michigan, and address any protesters by saying "I hear you. My future administration plans to make this war end. I made the first ceasefire happen, I can do it again."

I don't know if it's his style to treat protestors that way, but those protestors are so pozzed that if one of them suggested going to a Trump rally the others would ostracize that person on the spot for even suggesting having anything to do with Cheeto Hitler. They imagine that the MAGA crowd is ten times as hateful and violent as they actually are and because they're massive pussies, they wouldn't dare go to a Trump rally.

Besides, Trump already says that at his rallies anyway. He always claims he'll end the war in Ukraine and Israel by negotiating peace deals.

As a practicing Stable Diffusion enjoyer I cannot believe they're pulling this shit. Maybe not the campaign itself, but anyone in general. I haven't seen the original picture in full, but I'm sure I could pick out the errors by eye.

There are a few spots where it's suspect. Usually the easiest way to tell is to look at the signs, because AI fucks those up in weird ways. There's one that has letters upside down and even if you flipped it (I can believe Harris supporters being stupid enough to have a sign upside down) it would just be nonsense.
 
Why are they called the Democrats? Did they ever actually want a democracy at some period in time?
Yes. The Democrats were founded by Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren as a populist successor to the Democratic-Republican party (Jefferson’s party, who opposed Hamilton’s federalists).
Back then, it really was the party that was “democratic” compared to the Whig party.
 

Campaign Did Not Draft Kai Cenat ...Source Reacts to His Secret Service Rant​

1723144093367.png
Streaming superstar Kai Cenat is pissed he's getting calls from the Secret Service, because Kamala Harris' campaign wants to collaborate with him ... but we're told this is far from the truth.


Kai went live with an angry rant about politics and the Secret Service nosing into his world -- but no one from the Harris for President campaign has been in touch with Kai or his team ... a source with knowledge of the situation tells TMZ.



We're also told Harris campaign leadership hasn't even had any conversation about Kai interviewing Harris.


ICYMI ... Kai's live stream went viral after claiming he's received 5 calls from the Secret Service ... and he says an estranged female friend has been texting him to get with Harris' campaign. But, Kai makes it crystal clear he does not care about getting involved in politics.


As for why the Secret Service would be contacting him ... we're told Kai's team has been in contact with a third-party organization with informal ties to the DNC's convention team. There's talk of him possibly doing something when the convention kicks off in Chicago later this month, but it's unclear what that would look like.

We're also told the talks with Kai were initiated prior to President Biden dropping out of the election -- and, up to this point, no one from Kamala's campaign has been a part of those convos.

This all comes on the heels of Kai and Kamala supporters clamoring for them to link up after Donald Trump was interviewed by another popular streamer, Adin Ross.


We reached out to a rep for Kai ... so far, no word back.
 
I have close IRL friends, which whom I can openly tell racist and sexist jokes with (and are probably more politically incorrect than myself sometimes) falling for the "Vance is le weird" meme. They're sort of apolitical.

It's disheartening when people you thought were based are bluepilled.

I have one, who fell for the "weird" and latched onto something Vance may or may not have said (don't know, don't really care to wade through the politicized nonsense search engines to research it) about people who don't have children not having a vote. Whether it's true or not, I responded to this issue by stating that I don't think the childless are qualified to hold national leadership positions, because they inherently don't have as much of a stake in the future as parents do. A good example of a horrific childless leader is Merkel. Childless people will neg rate this post, but you'll see if you do have them that it truly does change more about your life and outlook than almost anything else, even gross trauma, does. I too was a teenager once and thought like a teenager, and being childless and thinking having kids changes nothing is similar to thinking like a teenager; you don't know what you don't know yet.
 
Campaign Did Not Draft Kai Cenat ...Source Reacts to His Secret Service Rant
This really gets undercut by the Faze dude making similar claims. I’m not going to believe them without proof, especially when they have a strong incentive to lie about this.
And even if it’s not entirely true, I’m so beyond caring about dirty tactics at this point that I will proudly proclaim from every rooftop that almost every major streamer her “fuck off” and that she’s dodging Jersh’s offer to join him on MATI.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander
 
Yes. The Democrats were founded by Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren as a populist successor to the Democratic-Republican party (Jefferson’s party, who opposed Hamilton’s federalists).
Back then, it really was the party that was “democratic” compared to the Whig party.

So back then they wanted the citizens to be able to vote on as many policies as logistically possible? When was the first time they won an election? Why didn't they implement that?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Puff
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back