Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Dante Alighieri]

I saw this making the rounds on X, and found the difference in interpretations between men and women very interesting:
View attachment 6290925

Men (not counting male feminists) generally interpreted this as something along the lines of "You aren't that hot but you're safe enough". Women interpreted it as being husband material plus being sexually attractive. What is your take, kiwis? Personally, I believe you can't word something like this properly and should just shut up instead, admittedly an impossible task for most women.

I'm leaning towards the general male interpretation. "So you don't want me physically but you want my protection and property?"

 

[Buttigieg2020]

I saw this making the rounds on X, and found the difference in interpretations between men and women very interesting:
View attachment 6290925

Men (not counting male feminists) generally interpreted this as something along the lines of "You aren't that hot but you're safe enough". Women interpreted it as being husband material plus being sexually attractive. What is your take, kiwis? Personally, I believe you can't word something like this properly and should just shut up instead, admittedly an impossible task for most women.

I have evidence of the different interpretations:





Women view marriage as the reward of a relationship while men view sex/physicality as the reward.

To her, she’s giving him a reward, but I wouldn’t see it that way. It’s a weird thing to say at all.

 

[Great General Ri Shin]

Men (not counting male feminists) generally interpreted this as something along the lines of "You aren't that hot but you're safe enough". Women interpreted it as being husband material plus being sexually attractive. What is your take, kiwis?

Femkiwis will call it ragebait. At best it is an extremely backhanded compliment. I thought women were supposed to be more social or something? “I wouldn’t have sex with you casually (you're not good enough??) but I will ‘settle’ for you.” Is the most obvious interpretation of what she said but I guess it’s possible to mean something positive from that? Like she would want to be with him long term I guess? I don’t see what would inspire her to phrase that so poorly when a simple “I’m glad I landed you.” Or something similar would’ve been literally perfect lol.
Pretty retarded woman if she actually said that. I can’t imagine saying something like that to your wife or fiancée. “Well y’know, you aren’t what I would’ve called beautiful when I was younger but despite all that you’re very a homely woman… what are you doing with that knife?” Because it’s such a stupid thing to say, and it’s on Reddit; home of the “my girlfriend has 6 bulls, AITA.” I’m inclined towards this being creative fiction.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

I saw this making the rounds on X, and found the difference in interpretations between men and women very interesting:
View attachment 6290925

Men (not counting male feminists) generally interpreted this as something along the lines of "You aren't that hot but you're safe enough". Women interpreted it as being husband material plus being sexually attractive. What is your take, kiwis? Personally, I believe you can't word something like this properly and should just shut up instead, admittedly an impossible task for most women.

To translate, she told him he wasn't her Alpha Fucks, but he's her Beta Bucks. Being charitable, maybe that's not what she meant, but your meanings and intentions are meaningless since no one can read your mind. In part this is a Manglish/Womanese translation thing, women are no better at Manglish, since both sexes use language differently. The other part is that thing I talk about with Women being the Gatekeepers of Sex and Men being the Gatekeepers of Relationships/Commitment. Because women want the relationship/commitment, they think that's what men want primarily too and don't understand why the men are mad, since they have no theory of mind for men. Men, however, want sex/fertility, and this guys girlfriend just told him that she doesn't find him attractive enough to give that to him without incentives. Which means the guy now knows he's not her Alpha Fucks. Comfortable and attractive enough to marry, but not attractive enough to want to fuck just to fuck.

"You're not attractive enough to really turn my crank, but you can buy me a house," is not going to go over well with anyone but Reddit cucks.

Edit: The Hoe_math take, in which he pisses a foid off.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

What is your take, kiwis?

the man's correct. she's saying he's the type she wouldn't sleep with at a frat party but is ready to marry when she's done sleeping around. she vocalized that he's the beta bux.

 

[Ibanez RG 350EX]

the man's correct. she's saying he's the type she wouldn't sleep with at a frat party but is ready to marry when she's done sleeping around. she vocalized that he's the beta bux.

I don't understand how it could be anything besides this. It wouldn't make sense to even bring up the distinction if that's not what you were implying.

It's akin to a man bringing up that he originally thought of his wife as just a slam pig, but gradually accepted being with her long-term. And expecting her to take it as a compliment.

 

[GunCar Gary]

the equal and opposite "compliment" would be a man telling his girlfriend she has nothing interesting to say, but man is she good looking

i can see how she's confused at facing consequences for saying something like that. feminism has told women that being expected to have a viewpoint other than "how does this benefit me, personally?" is the ultimate misogyny

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

I don't understand how it could be anything besides this. It wouldn't make sense to even bring up the distinction if that's not what you were implying.

It's akin to a man bringing up that he originally thought of his wife as just a slam pig, but gradually accepted being with her long-term. And expecting her to take it as a compliment.

and as a follow up she definitely said it because she thought he was a beta bux who would just take it. Women like that enjoy humiliating their partners like that. She's upset he had a modicum of self respect and is coping in post.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

Men (not counting male feminists) generally interpreted this as something along the lines of "You aren't that hot but you're safe enough". Women interpreted it as being husband material plus being sexually attractive. What is your take, kiwis? Personally, I believe you can't word something like this properly and should just shut up instead, admittedly an impossible task for most women.

I think being that oversensitive that the husband is the one sulking and the wife is the one freaking out about having said the wrong thing one time is awfully effeminate, traditionally the roles are reversed.
He didn't even gently challenge his wife as to what that's supposed to mean, he just immediately went and locked himself in the bathroom to sob (figuratively). Really not making a good case for why she should see you as rugged and desirable.

It was a dumb thing for her to have said, that's like telling your wife "You know in college I wouldn't have picked you out at a bar, but I'm glad I married you", no matter what it seems backhanded, but jesus some dudes these days really need to make a point of holding on to their balls.

Getting this bent out of shape over the topic of women and sleeping with other people is womanly and deranged (which is redundant); you aren't supposed to like it, but get a grip.

 

[Negus]

The Hoe_math take, in which he pisses a foid off.

I saw that take. The guy has good takes in general. He knows what he is talking about. Even while keeping in mind he has a financial incentive I don't recall finding any flaws in his reasoning. Big fan of his videos and have been considering buying his guide since it is like 12 bucks.
It was funny seeing some guys defend that Yap lady because apparently being racist is all it takes to suddenly be always right. What they seem to forget is that even a "based" woman is a woman.

 

[JamusActimus]

That reddit post is pretty much, you fulfill me emotionally but not physically.

If she was satisfied she would add: I would not think you're fwb/one night stand/ hook up material BUT wow you know how to turn me on /I cum so hard with you / I dig when you do X.

 

[The Ugly One]

I read that as "I'm done sleeping around and ready to settle down."

Casual sex really has been paying unending social dividends. I bet both of them die childless.

 

[Ibanez RG 350EX]

He didn't even gently challenge his wife as to what that's supposed to mean, he just immediately went and locked himself in the bathroom to sob (figuratively). Really not making a good case for why she should see you as rugged and desirable.

Attempting to "prove your desirability" to a woman who already clearly doesn't respect you is submissive, approval-seeking behavior. You automatically lose by virtue of even considering it.

The only way you resolve that situation with your dignity intact is by immediately packing your shit and ditching her ass.

 

[STARS158]

Getting this bent out of shape over the topic of women and sleeping with other people is womanly

I'd say in this case if she's stated she's settled and doesn't find you desirable, then she will go and get something desirable behind your back. It's only a matter of time.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

I saw that take. The guy has good takes in general. He knows what he is talking about. Even while keeping in mind he has a financial incentive I don't recall finding any flaws in his reasoning. Big fan of his videos and have been considering buying his guide since it is like 12 bucks.
It was funny seeing some guys defend that Yap lady because apparently being racist is all it takes to suddenly be always right. What they seem to forget is that even a "based" woman is a woman.

He's been surprisingly good, I'd almost equate him to a young Millennial or older Zoomer The Last Psychiatrist. Alone getting doxxed to his employers a decade ago is one of the great tragedies of the Internet, and hoe_math is better at distilling the underlying psychology than the old hats like Grandpa Rollo. Less PUA baggage, even if Rollo never was one. The best of the old Manosphere always pointed out that getting better with women as really just a side effect of actually improving yourself and that there was a significant overlap between the two things.
Better hoe_math than that deeply closeted faggot Tate.

There's a handful of Good Ones around the online Xitter "right," like verymoisturized, but they are very rare.

 

[The Hardest R]

She knew what she said was at a minimum insensitive because she couched it with “we were drunk” which in womanese means “I shouldn’t be held accountable for saying this.” I think she just didn’t expect him to react negatively. Good on the guy for correctly identifying the alpha fucks/beta bucks dynamic that a lot of guys miss. Hope he dumps her ass because she’ll cheat on him if she wasn’t already.

 

[Pina Colada]

Solberg was considered to be on the right too.

Women being war brides and rewards for being conquered has been a thing from day one. That’s why the rapefugees in Europe help themselves to the local girls: Europe is a conquered land and it’s just hindbrain intuition. Governments refusing to take meaningful action on this only encourages the activity which is absolutely the point.

It’s also why women have no concept of patriotism or any kind of forward thinking and instead focus on muh tingles and what makes them feel good. Women used to generally just subscribe to what their husband’s viewpoints are, which angered and confounded the left but they finally found a solution with social media. The need to get updoots online is a stronger instinct than just believing what their husband thinks. This was intentional.

To be fair, the anti-patriotism comes from the usual feminist "with us or against us" groupthink that they weaponize to take advantage of appealing to women's emotions (i.e. "think of the poor, emanciated, refugees). It's a tale as old as time that's self-explanatory.

 

[The Hardest R]

I’m inclined towards this being creative fiction.

If it’s fiction, they’ve done their homework. There’s various little tells that it’s a very womanly way of thinking about things. The casual solipsism, thinking getting drunk means any negative consequences should automatically be handwaved away, etc.

To be fair, the anti-patriotism comes from the usual feminist "with us or against us" groupthink that they weaponize to take advantage of appealing to women's emotions (i.e. "think of the poor, emanciated, refugees). It's a tale as old as time that's self-explanatory.

Women have never been patriotic unless their boyfriend or husband subscribes to that viewpoint. Going to parties on the Fourth of July does not count as being patriotic.

 

[The Ugly One]

Women can be patriotic, but it doesn't come from the same psychological/emotional place it does for men because women aren't built to defend society from threats.

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

If it’s fiction, they’ve done their homework. There’s various little tells that it’s a very womanly way of thinking about things. The casual solipsism, thinking getting drunk means any negative consequences should automatically be handwaved away, etc.

Which amuses me, getting drunk doesn't make you do things you don't want to do, it just lowers your inhabitation threshold. In this case, it made her just a little too honest. The guy's pretty sharp too, walking away and going semi radio silent from the sounds of it.