The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

How does this asshole you quote there make the connection that if you're born in England to two Indian parents you are by default English.

But if you were born in India to two English parents you were clearly English.

One way street on that eh!
I found out a few years ago one of my great-great grandmothers was a proper, born in Madras, daughter of the Raj.

Of course she then married the son of a potatonigger who drank through his father's shipping fortune, and so we became scum.
 
Ash Sarkar trying to justify mass immigration by bringing up the British Raj:
View attachment 6290928
A while ago someone pointed out that the UK now undergoes more immigration in a year than the Raj did during the entire British rule. I wish I could find the source I'm thinking of now but it was extremely eye-opening.

The only form of oppression that is profoundly harmful is demographic replacement. Because you can't come back from it. You're ruled by a foreign power, but they're not sending millions of settlers? You can kick them out. They are and there's nothing you can do about it? You're basically fucked and your problem is now forever.

Even someone like Pol Pot, who butchered his own people by the millions and set his country back decades, had the decency to not inflict the permanent wound of encouraging the settlement of millions of non-Cambodians into the country. When looking at things on a long-term timeframe, Tony Blair inflicted more damage onto Britain than Pol Pot did on Cambodia.
They really can't decide between the "Diversity is our strength, these people benefit your country" argument, or the "these people moving over is your punishment for colonialism" argument, can they?

How does this asshole you quote there make the connection that if you're born in England to two Indian parents you are by default English.

But if you were born in India to two English parents you were clearly English.

One way street on that eh!
The people that argue this don't even believe it themselves, it only applies to non-Westerners moving to the West, not Westerners moving away. They just use it as an argument to try and brow-beat you into accepting their insanity and allowing outsiders to flood into your country.
If an English couple moved to China and gave birth to a child, no-one on the left would ever seriously consider that child Chinese, even if they spoke perfect Mandarin and never experienced anything outside of China. Hell, most of them adamantly refuse to consider Afrikaaners as real Africans despite many of them living in South Africa for centuries, and they'll always be "colonizers" who'll never truly be African - but N'dongo Ubetwe can hop off a dinghy while speaking nothing but Swahili, get handed some citizenship documents with the aid of an NGO, and he's instantly just as European as the natives to these people.
 
CAM ON INGERLAND

WHAT MORE DO YOU HAVE TO LOSE

IMG_4412.jpeg
 
Equating national identity with not with race, ancestry or ethnicity but with citizenship and allegiance is always fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsul
Cromwell allowed the Jews back into England.

This actually was a very good idea at the time.

Bearing in mind the rest of mostly very Catholic and Lutheran Europe was having an autistic shit fit about blasphemy and unbelievers in ever corner, Cromwell opened Ireland and the UK to very wealthy and highly skilled Jewish and Protestant dissident craftsmen who went on to build very successful industries in many different fields in both nations.

He was a fundamentalist, but this odd little gap in his beliefs actually was a huge gain for the UK at that time and brought several industries the British empire previously didn't have.

I've no idea if it was intentional, but it paid off eitherway.
 
Last edited:
They're absolutely holding off certain convictions to stop people from comparing them. Ricky Jones should be tried, immediately; on television. Just like the others.
He should and all they are doing is doubling down on the hypocrisy. Not speeding up his trial like everyone else means a month of comparisons, him not being fired as many of these rioters will have been, Labour not expelling him etc. will all get brought up.

The sweet heart deal he will no doubt get in sentencing will make it even better. Like I say UK farmers, don't scream about it or make it a race/immigration thing. Just mention the case and point out that sharing information about it is something Kier wants to jail people for.

Amnesty worker applauding it is the cherry on top since it then leads to "notice how all these separate, "organic" protests have the same signs like some organisations are producing them and organising the counter protests? Wonder how many groups like Amnesty are involved in this."
 
I found out a few years ago one of my great-great grandmothers was a proper, born in Madras, daughter of the Raj.

Of course she then married the son of a potatonigger who drank through his father's shipping fortune, and so we became scum.
lol owned.
Equating national identity with not with race, ancestry or ethnicity but with citizenship and allegiance is always fun.
1723247101876.png
 

Anyone wondering what the British riots are about will be confused when they read articles and see photos of a shirtless guy stealing a tray of Gregg's sausage rolls, and a woman with a handful of Crocs shoes.

And there's wheelie-bin chav who threw herself at the feet of police

 
I found out a few years ago one of my great-great grandmothers was a proper, born in Madras, daughter of the Raj.

Of course she then married the son of a potatonigger who drank through his father's shipping fortune, and so we became scum.
In the minor PL'ing I've done here, I mentioned I'm an oldfag back from the Something Awful days, and I'm definitley known as the far right redneck at work. But not only do I have age-related seniority, I have a ancient Jewish relative.

So if I get shit before retirement for "Not having the right opinions" I can just play the Jew card. Watch em squirm as you reverse Uno the DEI cunts.


Play the hand you're dealt, my friends. And fuck the globalist establishment.
 
I remember, because I'm a legit old lady, when King Charles III, as Prince of Wales, was so cozy with Muslims that many people thought, unironically, that he was a secret Muslim himself. (Not to mention that the Princess of Wales' boyfriend, who was killed with her, was Muslim, and there were rumors she would convert if they married.) There were also rumors that she'd convert to Catholicism after being so buddy-buddy with Mother Teresa, so take it all with a grain of salt.

At the time of the coronation, I heard on the news that Charles wanted to change the designation "Defender of the Faith" to "Defender of Faiths" but was told that was a no-go. Since that title was given to Henry VIII by Pope Leo X for a "Defense of the Seven Sacraments", (supposedly written by the king, but more probably written largely or wholly by (Saint) Sir Thomas More), the Kings and Queens of England shouldn't use it at all, but I'm a curmudgeon(ess).
 
Back