Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 76 18.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.8%

  • Total voters
    417
Yeah, until you get to the part where Barnes (according to himself) bailed on Snipes because he didn't want to be associated with the sentence handed down for the misdemeanor convictions. @Musashi's Son pointed that out from this Hollywood Reporter article.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ho...ws/fired-wesley-snipes-lawyers-big-62843/amp/
I also have criticized his conduct after the case. Repeatedly. I do not believe a lawyer should trash-talk a client after the fact even when it does not directly violate ethical rules.

I'm just saying he actually did do a good job at the trial phase.
 
Rekieta is fine with challenging and talking about the drug thing and the bodycam footage etc. but has anybody confronted him on livestream about letting Aaron have sex multiple times with his WIFE ? That's the one thing I have not heard him talk about yet, I would like to hear if there is some CRAZY story how that actually did not happen at all
 
I might have some questions about warrant and process if the house was more spotless than operating room and there was no drugs at all including alcohol in the house... But the totality and findings... Even if it was slightly wrong it is mandatory step to fight it to some level, but arguing that you could win is insanity...
Ya think?

It's an uphill battle to argue there existed no probable cause when the cops find the very items that they were looking to find as described in the warrant.

What? Did they just make a super fucking lucky guess there was dope at Casa de Balldo?

Rekieta is fine with challenging and talking about the drug thing and the bodycam footage etc. but has anybody confronted him on livestream about letting Aaron have sex multiple times with his WIFE ?
He's just gonna lie and claim the only people they sleep with are each other.

It's pointless.
 
Barnes is full of shit. I don't think he's stupid so much as I think he's willfully dishonest.
Much like Nick, I think he has adopted the persona and attitude he uses as a lawyer into how he navigates social situations.
He is treating Nick like a client. Sometimes lawyers need to be wilfully ignorant to do their job, especially if their client isn't willing to admit fault despite it being clear cut.

The fact he instantly retreated to constitutional arguments, rather than anything of actual substance, shows signs of desperation.
 
It's an uphill battle to argue there existed no probable cause when the cops find the very items that they were looking to find as described in the warrant.
It's actually irrelevant to a facial challenge to the sufficiency of the warrant that they found what they were looking for.

The warrant has to present probable cause on its face, which is to say based solely on the textual content of the warrant itself. If the warrant just says "we consulted a psychic who said cocaine was in the house" and then they go in and find cocaine, the warrant is facially invalid. The evidence resulting from it gets excluded.
 
He's just gonna lie and claim the only people they sleep with are each other.
I mean he's openly talking about April now, just hasn't gone as far as to formally announce he's a polycoomer.
I say give it a month or and it'll be "the girls"
 
Just screencap shit.
Not sure how strict the rules are for this, but perhaps might be good to also have the lawyer screencap too so the lawyer can attest to the authenticity.
Nick will likely try to counter any screenshots with "How do we know the screenshots are accurate and true? There is no one here to attest to it." But again, not sure how strict the rules are for this. It is not like you are trying to convict Nick, just showing that there is a narrative out there that the execution of the search and arrest, and the officers conduct, had been put into question.
But I also assume you got this under control and been told what is sufficient to present in an request like this.
 
It's actually irrelevant to a facial challenge to the sufficiency of the warrant that they found what they were looking for.

The warrant has to present probable cause on its face, which is to say based solely on the textual content of the warrant itself. If the warrant just says "we consulted a psychic who said cocaine was in the house" and then they go in and find cocaine, the warrant is facially invalid. The evidence resulting from it gets excluded.
Right, but they didn't consult a psychic. They had solid witness and observational evidence to establish probable cause.

I appreciate your legal expertise, but precious little of what you said above seems germane in the instant case. This is so because Nick is a fucking idiot who gave them plenty of probable cause. I think what they had would have satisfied any judge to sign off.

I don't think this warrant, and the resultant seized evidence, is getting tossed.

Null has a direct shower line with Nick, I think it would be funny if Null asked about the Aaron thing and see if Nick wants to answer. If he tries to deny it, there will be a shitstorm from Aaron and casino boys and others
Nobody should touch the cow, and Null should lead by example. He should straight up ignore Rekieta's dumb ass. He even said he's not gonna talk to Rekieta directly anymore (smart).

Somebody will probably do it eventually. Just wait.

Besides Andy and Ashton have said they have received shower calls from Nick too. They can do it themselves if they need the content that badly.

I can't wait for the RICO charges.
Much like Lupus, it's never RICO.
 
Last edited:
Barnes is full of shit. I don't think he's stupid so much as I think he's willfully dishonest.

Barnes is one of those people who believes that the constitution means whatever he chooses to see in it when he reads it. You see that approach among many libertarians. They reject everything including literal original intent and all court precedent back to day one in favor of their own personal ideas.

He isn't stupid. He is just promoting a theory of law that is equal to total anarchy.
 
Nick's fixation on "We" in the shower texts & his on-stream commentary imply he's thinking about / threatening painting the forum & its empresario as involved in a conspiracy of harassment, stalking, or whatever else he can think of to throw at the wall. This thread is (now) making fun of him, but maybe he'd try to glom unrelated incidents onto the forum.
 
Just screencap shit.
Wouldn't it be better to have video footage scrolling through the Instagram posts?
Catching up on MATI from yesterday.

and the "You have a(n) _____ Avatar" shit is such a fucking faggot way of dealing with something someone says.
Wasn't Nick the one that asked Kyle Rittenhouse, a yound lad, about hentai, futanary and those sort of things? If anything, he is openly degenerate to those around him even if they are way younger than him.
Are there any other major points related to the day the search was executed? Was Aliesha Sweep the HHS rep present that day or was it someone else?
I'll check Barnes content in a bit, he's an avid conspiracy theorist for his king Balldo. I am sure he must have slipped more than a few times.
 
My artistic interpretation of the Rekieta's arrest.

nick-rekieta-arrest-art-interp.png
 
Wasn't Nick the one that asked Kyle Rittenhouse, a yound lad, about hentai, futanary and those sort of things? If anything, he is openly degenerate to those around him even if they are way younger than him.
The Balls vs No Balls thing was a long time joke in his chat going back to Weeb Wars.

It just goes to show that the Anime "Degenerates" will make jokes about shit but don't really care for Drug Induced Polycules because they are the ones that left after Nick started to chase Wine Aunt pussy on Locals.
 
Before encountering this gay skeleton, I thought constitutionalist "sovereign citizen" types were misunderstood libertarians. Now I understand why people mock them to no end and laugh at their antics.
"Im not driving drunk with my children in the car, I am operating my land boat in order to travel to their activities officer. Am I being detained??????"
 
Right, but they didn't consult a psychic. They had solid witness and observational evidence to establish probable cause.
That was actually my point, though. Barnes and his minions have pointed to nothing about the facial validity of the warrant.

My point was simply that the fact they actually did find cocaine (something I love to point out again and again) is irrelevant to a FACIAL challenge to the sufficiency of probable cause for the warrant, which they had PLENTY OF.

There are several steps the state needs to prosecute possession. Probable cause for the search is merely one of them.
"Im not driving drunk with my children in the car, I am operating my land boat in order to travel to their activities officer. Am I being detained??????"
I am not driving at all! I am TRAVELING, as I am allowed to do under the Magna Carta! AND the Uniform Commercial Code. Checkmate atheists!
 
Back