Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
Since he was the one who wrote the application, it's clear they are talking about him throughout when they discuss the alleged bias of the person who wrote it, but I will include this for completeness from around 28 minutes of the "Breaking down the Rekieta application for a search warrant" stream where they name him by his initials (QP) specifically so there really is no doubt.

They are making all strawman arguments too. The cop isn't unbiased when they write the warrant. They believe a crime has been committed. They believe Nick committed it.

It's the judge that's the disinterested party.

And Barnes knocking the cop for being in a small town department cuts both ways. Nick is just a small town junkie who would reply in the same slow local drawl that Barnes tried to disparage the Kandiyohi deputy with. If the deputy knows Nick, he can likely talk about his descent into addiction.

I'd really like to see Barnes bring that attitude into the courtroom with a small town judge, small town cops, small town jury and Nick. "Your honor, my super sophisticated client wearing the Hot topic belt, doesn't even know what cocaine is and didn't know what was in his safe and night table. These hick cops have been harassing my client by responding to 911 calls alleging he was being held by gunmen. They responded like his life was in danger rather than waiting until daylight and checking on him casually. All these residents of hick towns like Spicer think drugs are everywhere when they really didn't know it was cocaine until the state lab said it was. All you hicks have no business ever alleging drug crimes. Only inner city people know about drugs."
 
Last edited:
Nah, what he really *wanted* to say was that Null is the leader of a gang of online paedophiles who like sucking little boy's dicks.

Yes, but it’s not why some people think. Nick knows damn well there’s no pedo presence on this website. He isn’t saying this shit because he has a righteous conviction.

He’s a narcissist, and a cruel one besides. Some of you weren’t raised around those types and it shows (good). They say the most intentionally inflammatory things to wound the person they’re after. He’s trying to push Null’s buttons. He sees a thread of normal people making fun of him and he wants to grossly offend them. “Dear John” was a glimpse of Nick’s abuse in full force.

A tale of an abusive narc I knew: he was abusive to his wife, and she had horrible trauma; she was molested as a child by her own brother. He’d say shit like, “you know, maybe this marriage just can’t work; I’m afraid I’ll never be as good as a lover as your brother,” and do this weird lip-slurp at her and laugh. Unsurprisingly, she ended up in the bin for a long time. He’s dead now, I think. World’s a better place for it.

Someone was wondering up thread if there’s something screwy with Nick’s family. Maybe. There may be a history of SOME sort of narcissistic abuse. From which tree the rotten fruit sprung is anyone’s guess; neither Bob or Celeste seem particularly invested in whatever’s going on.
 
Has Rekieta ever seriously criticized or complained about Candyass County in any significant capacity before now? I have zero memory of this.
No. He's bitched about cops and sometimes courts or other lawyers, but he's never gone after the county or cities nearby. Barnes made that shit up from whole cloth. The concept of Nick actually doing work to investigate something is laughable. All he does is complain, and the most he's complained about were the Scandinavian incel prudes at his (former) church.
 
No. He's bitched about cops and sometimes courts or other lawyers, but he's never gone after the county or cities nearby. Barnes made that shit up from whole cloth. The concept of Nick actually doing work to investigate something is laughable. All he does is complain, and the most he's complained about were the Scandinavian incel prudes at his (former) church.
And when you take all that and put it up against his record as an attorney, what he's probably mostly salty about is the fact he simply sucks ass as an attorney. He just doesn't recognize his problem as such. His Ls are always the fault of other people. Barnes is handing him a cope that appeals to his ego.

Barnes: "It's because of the corruption, Nick! You would be a winner if not for that!"
Nick: "Yeah? I mean... YEAH! THAT DAMN CORRUPTION!"

And we're off to the races.
 
When he gets pressed his go to is"You couldn't possibly know."
And when he pulls that faggot shit, the go to is "eat shit faggot, I know, and you know I know. Your dumb faggot tricks don't work on me."
If anything, he's been made more popular with some folk thanks to his new caught-a-felony status.
There's a name for those people. They're called wiggers. They're called retards.
 
Unfortunate for the kids, since this whole thing is just going to embolden Nick to being an even bigger drunk/coke head the second the feds get off his ass. But boy is it going to be funny for us when he inevitably gets busted again
I was thinking about it earlier, considering how he'd be in the future and how his kids will remember this time in their lives.

This won't be "The time Daddy was arrested" or "The time we didn't have any clothes or food"

It'll be "The first time..."
 
Dear Nick:

We all individually hate you for about five minutes a day. The toll is pretty cheap.

You hate us all day, every day. Quite an investment.

Get clean, you ridiculous crack muppet. That’s how to make life suck less; there’s no winning against a decentralized mass of people who think you’re a piece of shit because you’re a piece of shit. The audience isn’t coming back.
 
Unfortunate for the kids, since this whole thing is just going to embolden Nick to being an even bigger drunk/coke head the second the feds get off his ass. But boy is it going to be funny for us when he inevitably gets busted again
The only lessons Nick learned are to hide his coke usage better and to keep the kids away from the church so the clergy can't see how neglected they are and report it to the cops.
 
The only lessons Nick learned is to hide his coke usage better and to keep the kids away from the church so the clergy can't see how neglected they are and report it to the cops.
The only reason he was caught was his weird insistence on "homeschooling" to present himself as some kind of fake trad dad, when in reality, he is a cucking, swinging, cocaine-addicted loser.

All the mandatory reporters who reported him were due to him doing his fake "trad dad" homeschooling BULLSHIT.
 
I'm talking about passive surveillance. A cop can watch you on a public street without a warrant. A cop can watch you on a public livestream without a warrant. Neither is like phone tapping, or otherwise invasive surveillance.
I think this falls into what police can do when investigating a crime. For Nick, they had a criminal complaint when they started looking at footage. That's different than just deciding to make Nick a project and watching hours of video looking for evidence of any crime. Watching the public video while investigating a possible crime makes the search "reasonable" and that is what negates the need for a warrant.

I think there is a legal difference between watching a public street and seeing you commit crime vs. watching you while you are on a public street. In SCOTUS Katz vs US, I believe the government installed a microphone in public telephone booth. They were targeting an individual and ruled the 4th amendment "protected people not places." That case established the "reasonable expectation of privacy" doctrine despite the microphone being in a public phone booth. I think the most recent ruling similar to this was US vs Jones where police put a GPS tracking device on a car. The location data was of the car in only public places on city streets. SCOTUS ruled that "reasonable expectation of privacy" was not applicable. GPS data tossed as evidence as it was a form of trespass.

In short, I think it's a stronger argument that watching public video in response to a criminal complaint is a reasonable search rather than just stating all public videos are allowed.
 
In short, I think it's a stronger argument that watching public video in response to a criminal complaint is a reasonable search rather than just stating all public videos are allowed.
They needed no cause to watch a public video deliberately and publicly broadcast, and even if they had no active investigation, they could have opened one just based on the content of the deranged cokestream.

In this case, they already had probable cause because of multiple witnesses telling mandatory reporters that this degenerate scumbag was obviously behaving in a criminal manner, neglecting his children, driving them around drunk off his ass, and dropping them off at school stinking, filthy, in the same clothes they'd been wearing for days, and starving.
 
My artistic interpretation of the Rekieta's arrest.

View attachment 6293591
My God...what an incredible coffee mug this would make! Is there an internet personality that would be so brave to sell these? Can someone ask Mr Metoker? Or would Barnes try and sue on Nick's behalf because he's such a good friend? LMFAO
 
I also have criticized his conduct after the case. Repeatedly. I do not believe a lawyer should trash-talk a client after the fact even when it does not directly violate ethical rules.

My guess is that it has to be a dispute over money, I think. I bet Barnes was badmouthing him because Snipes stiffed him on the bill.

Because it makes no sense. Who the hell would hire a lawyer who has a record of shittalking their ex-clients? Especially when their ex-client is a high profile media personality. Barnes has to have made the calculation that he'd make more money from letting people know that he'd acted for Snipes than he would have done from word of mouth recommendations to Snipes pals.

I can't think of any circumstances under which I'd hire Barnes to act as my lawyer.
 
My guess is that it has to be a dispute over money, I think. I bet Barnes was badmouthing him because Snipes stiffed him on the bill.

Because it makes no sense. Who the hell would hire a lawyer who has a record of shittalking their ex-clients? Especially when their ex-client is a high profile media personality. Barnes has to have made the calculation that he'd make more money from letting people know that he'd acted for Snipes than he would have done from word of mouth recommendations to Snipes pals.

I can't think of any circumstances under which I'd hire Barnes to act as my lawyer.
If you want to lose your case with dumbass appeals to le Constitooshun you would hire Barnes in a heartbeat
 
Refresh my memory: Is EWU the father-daughter abandoned places thing? The daughter is kinda hot? I think I may have seen a few of their videos a while ago. Are they doing tru-crime now or something? Seems odd they would be interested in Nick from what I remember seeing from them.
I thought EWU had always been a true crime channel, but upon checking their oldest videos lo' and behold they did used to make vids exploring abandoned places. Ig they pivoted to true crime after JCS got popular and even managed to get the guy who voiced JCS' vids as their full time narrator. Their stuff is ok, not the best of TC youtube, but enjoyable enough, and the sheer volume they put out makes it hard to ignore.
 
there’s no winning against a decentralized mass of people who think you’re a piece of shit because you’re a piece of shit. The audience isn’t coming back.
InHisOwnWords_Smug.PNG
Dear Nool,

I’m winning. I’m winning. I’M WINNING

Sincerely,
:fapcup::really: Esq.
 
Back