Ava Chris Tyson / Christopher Stephen Tyson / “Christine Tyson” / “Chris The Meme God” - MrBeast’s litigious troon sidekick & divorcé. Lolicon-loving narcissistic queer

[behindyourightnow]

Troons are a smaller part of the population. This kind of "thing that never happens" actually happens all the time. Very often for what is supposed to be a small subset of people.

Need to keep tapping that sign:

 

[Wikipedia]

Im late and have nothing to contribute. I am one of the few people who actually likes Mr. Beast's chocolate, unlike most other bars it does not have the bitter Americanoid taste most do (maybe not now, could of changed). It was the only thing I liked about him. Besides that fuck this fag, all I ask for is that Chandler leave Mr. Beast and live a holy life with his family.

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

Need to keep tapping that sign:

View attachment 6293027

"If you are X then you must also be Y and Z" is retarded. Let the cows moo for themselves, and let that mooing be how we recognize them.

 

[Salgado]

The whole "He is changing peoples lives" argument kinda falls apart when he built 100 houses in some central american shithole and people started selling them instantly

View attachment 6294069

That's not real. People took screenshots from the video and made Facebook Marketplace posts as a joke.

 

[Sir Baz the Intolerant]

Turner explains that before Delaware, there was another manager named Dan who had a five year old son. He claims Kris, Jimmy, and others frequently made sexual jokes about the manager's child.

I may be jumping the gun on this a little, but if what this Turner buck is saying is true about Jimmy, then I'm definitely leaning in on him being a pedo. Whether it's Mr Girl, Vito, or Shadman, sexually aggressive jokes about kids are a major tell tale on someone being a kiddy fiddler, it's just not what normal men do. And then when you consider just how far Jimmy's gone to defend the likes of Chris and Delaware too, I'm pretty convinced now that there's some very illegal shit on that man's hard drive, and I think Chris probably knows about it as well.

 

[Till Krannies]

Muta chiming in on the Delaware situation

https://youtu.be/tVUfTrrGbxM?si=nuAI0vekhhQAceTk

 

[Portal Mahogany Creamer]

> Sexual fetishes tend to cluster

QRD on this? I googled it, but I only found "Cluster A, B, and C" in paraphilias, like the personality types.

 

[behindyourightnow]

"If you are X then you must also be Y and Z" is retarded. Let the cows moo for themselves, and let that mooing be how we recognize them.

If you are an autogynephile, you are statistically more likely than the average male to be a pedophile. That does not mean that you must be a pedophile. Pedophiles are probably still a minority among transwomen, but a higher proportion of transwomen are pedophiles when compared to the rest of the male population.

To put it in analogy: if I meet an average man on the street in your hometown, there is a higher than average chance that he has slept with your mom, compared to the chance that he has slept with any other woman in town that he isn't married to. That doesn't mean I assume that a man in your town (condition X) must have slept with your mom (conclusion Y) and that your dad watched (conclusion Z), just that the likelihood of Y and Z is elevated.

 

[gagabobo1997]

QRD on this? I googled it, but I only found "Cluster A, B, and C" in paraphilias, like the personality types.

He's saying that people one weird fetish tend to have other weird fetishes. anecdotally it seems true, not sure of any literature to support it, I'm sure it's been studied before though.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

QRD on this? I googled it, but I only found "Cluster A, B, and C" in paraphilias, like the personality types.

It comes up a lot in the tranny sideshows thread, usually in the context of reddit posts that basically all go like this:

I thought I was normal and straight, then I started watching X type of porn, which cracked my egg. Now I think I'm into diapers/being a cum slut for men/bdsm/vore/etc.

The comments usually go like this:

So true/happened to me/welcome to another fetish/you're valid/asspats and erp.

I know anecdotes are not data. However, I think Ray Blanchard has done studies on paraphilias and has observed that once a man develops one fetish the odds of him developing more fetishes goes way up.

 

[Portal Mahogany Creamer]

He's saying that people one weird fetish tend to have other weird fetishes. anecdotally it seems true, not sure of any literature to support it, I'm sure it's been studied before though.

I was thinking it would make sense if paraphilias were grouped by those same personality disorder types. Pedophilia and AGP both seem pretty cluster A to me, an armchair psychologist.

 

[Duke Nukem]

Seriously what's with YouTubers and turning out to be gross weirdos? I shudder at the thought of the skeletons in Skibidi Toilet Man's closet.

 

[Gog & Magog]

If we'd won that fucking war there'll be NONE of this shit. Fucking none.

The great military history scholar Mr David Irving once aptly said:

And if those veterans that stormed the beaches of Normandy could had had a glimpse of the future they wouldn't have advanced a single feet up those shores.

The only thing we got to do is to protect the children.

The Germans would have either enslaved or murdered every "untermenschen" child they came across, ones like you even. What a grand alternative.

QRD on this? I googled it, but I only found "Cluster A, B, and C" in paraphilias, like the personality types.

Paraphilia is the clinical name for sexual fetish disorders observed in patients. Do note not all fetishes are automatically labeled paraphilias, only those described by patients, or health authorities, to be very harmful or distressing. Even with academia in big troon's pocket, there are still plenty enough studies, and online observations, for us to conclude these things are more than mere casual associations.

 

[Glowie]

He's saying that people one weird fetish tend to have other weird fetishes. anecdotally it seems true, not sure of any literature to support it, I'm sure it's been studied before though.

Just look at f-list it's filled with mentally unstable genderbenders. That's just one example

 

[FusRoDamus]

QRD on this? I googled it, but I only found "Cluster A, B, and C" in paraphilias, like the personality types.

He's saying that people one weird fetish tend to have other weird fetishes. anecdotally it seems true, not sure of any literature to support it, I'm sure it's been studied before though.

Not an expert, but from what I've read the research is split, largely due to confounding factors in performing the research. The problem is, much of the established research is performed on subjects who are unreliable narrators (e.g., convicts) and tend to indicate that paraphiliacs typically have just one fetish. When research is done on subjects who are assured of anonymity, the paraphilia clusters show up.

This gives an interesting view on the phenomenon: Multiple Paraphilic Diagnoses among Sex Offenders

This is also the result that's often supported by anecdotal data.

Spoiler: Warning: mild power-leveling

I used to be a moderator for a fetish community forum, and it was pretty well understood that fetishes tended to come in groups. It was such a cliche that it was a recurring joke:

Q: What do you call a guy with just one fetish?
A: A liar.

There's a bit of dark subtext to the humor. This was in a community that explicitly existed for the open discussion of fetishes and was quite accepting of some pretty weird stuff. So a guy who was lying about just having one fetish was invariably hiding some nasty shit, e.g., pedophilia.

 

[behindyourightnow]

QRD on this? I googled it, but I only found "Cluster A, B, and C" in paraphilias, like the personality types.

There's a bit, although a lot of the papers are older.

Spoiler: More

I doubt you can get any funding to research the subject these days as institutions would label it "transphobic," and even if you could somehow miraculously publish it, you would be immediately targeted by TRAs. Andrea James and other autogynephiles were already going after J. Michael Bailey back in the early 2000s for writing about autogynephilia. There was a years-long campaign to ruin him professionally, and they did things like post pictures of his young children online with sexualized captions. No one sane would dare to research anything related to autogynephilia these days.

I was thinking it would make sense if paraphilias were grouped by those same personality disorder types. Pedophilia and AGP both seem pretty cluster A to me, an armchair psychologist.

I don't think they are grouped that way, but now you mention it, personality disorder prevalence in one study of transgender people seeking SRS was 81%. The prevalence of narcissistic personality disorder was 57.1% and "masochistic-sadistic" personality disorder was 34.3%. Source. I wouldn't call that study particularly reliable, but this one is. It's a huge study that used electronic health records, got published in a "transgender health" journal, and saw results like this:



Transgender people are over thirty times more likely to suffer from cluster B personality disorders than the control population (3.4% vs 0.11%).

 

[Cursed PBD]

Muta chiming in on the Delaware situation

https://youtu.be/tVUfTrrGbxM?si=nuAI0vekhhQAceTk

Muta, like all YouTubers is an annoying unnatural faggot, a professional leech that spreads negativity everywhere he goes.
These commentators and truth warpers are worse than Mr. Beast who was already a subhuman waste of life.
I don't think any of this will amount to much. In this day and age no one falls off for good, it's very short sighted to believe otherwise, but these people put together pozzed uncreative videos for a reason.

 

[Soyjak Enjoyer]

QRD on this?

It's mostly anecdotal. In my opinion there are 3 types of people sexually
1. normal
2. has a fetish or two
3. nymphomaniacs who are into nearly everything (these people now often self-identify as "gooners")

Group 1 is big, group 2 is moderately sized, group 3 is small. However, despite group 2 being larger than 3 they are dispersed among several different communities, while the average person in group 3 is in several of those communities, and consequently if you pick an average person in one of those communities they are still very likely to be from group 3. Oh and also the people from group 3 are also much less abashed about their proclivities skewing it even more. This is why for example I can filter by a weird tag like "incest" on a website like AO3 and only need to scroll down to the 3rd result to find some abomination full of much worse tags like this

 

[Glowie]

Pedobear largely is a late 2000s-early 2010s meme though, falling off well before the time period that surrounded the 2016 election which is the focal point of "mid 2010s-edginess" where people were people were saying slurs and pushing the envelope in the mainstream before the mass censorship we see today, but no one but pedophiles really "joked" about jerking it to lolis

It stops being a joke when you get a Shadman's poster on your wall, someone has to explain what level of irony when you buy art from a convicted pedo artist.
Every Shadman fan is a lolicon obsessed deviant and a pedophile.

 

[gagabobo1997]

1. normal
2. has a fetish or two

i'd argue that these are equivalent as having a few specific things that turn you on isn't exactly abnormal, I imagine almost everyone has something that gets them going that they wouldn't want to talk about in public, even if its usually something mundane like sexy schoolgirl outfits. I guess it depends on what you consider a fetish though. Some might say liking lingerie is a fetish (and i'd be likely to agree based off of common definitions of the word) but some might also say that it's not and is just a normal thing.

However, AGP isn't a 'normal' fetish. It's people with these extreme fringe fetishes that seem to be much more likely to be complete degens with a billion different kinks.