Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember: I'M the thirsty one.I've seen shock/gore images that haven't made me as nauseous as i was reading this post.
One of my favorite goofy online happenings from the only time I tried to use Discord is I went on a supposed conservative server and they were talking about cop stuff. I simply said something like 'black people get arrested more often because they commit more crime'. Permed right there. Learned my lesson instantly on Discord and I'm sure Reddit is the same if you try that.THE HORROR
And they already don't vote right anyway. Point? Or should the GOP abandon any meaningful strategy to pander to people who were never going to vote for them anyway?Those cat ladies are slotted to 30+ per cent of the milenials and zoomers 15+ per cent of xers
Married women with children overwhelming vote republican. Unlikely Vance's views turn away family oriented women.this doesn't include women who are married or have kids or both but are rubbed the wrong way by it.
Lmao, source on this?B) its the double standards single childless men are even larger group who fucked around and found out in their 40s and not a peep about them .
Can you link? I need more context.If you want to see what i mean go to woman hate who suggested to break up with a woman saying she sees her long term bf as a husband and not hookup material and he isn't 30 yet has time. That attitude made a lot of milenials and x-ers to not be fathers and married before their 40th bday and many more men literally dying alone.
ETA2: This makes sense too, the guy looks cracked out of his head usually. Both of them seem to have severe anger issues.
View attachment 6298529
Worse than that. Biden's staff was mostly Establishment types. Horribly equipped to deal with Clown World but not actually incompetent. They were just handed a giant pile of shit and told to make the Great Wall of China out of it. An impossible task. Harris' team is almost entirely progs. They have an even bigger mountain of shit and none of the competency. Yet utterly ideologically captured to the point that, unlike Biden's team, her's has no idea that their candidate even is shit.
People say some foul shitRemember: I'M the thirsty one.
The reason Infogalatic failed is because it was not made as a neutral alternative but rather a Le Edgy Alt Right alternative. Just read their article on Obama, for example, where it says he was groomed by the deep state with no citation, and it's run by an infamous alt-righter in Vox Day. Of course, it was going to fail.This already exists, it's called Infogalactic, it was the brainchild of lolcow Theodore Beale aka Vox Day aka Teddy Spaghetti and nobody uses it.
Discord is a cancer quitting; it is great for your life.One of my favorite goofy online happenings from the only time I tried to use Discord is I went on a supposed conservative server and they were talking about cop stuff. I simply said something like 'black people get arrested more often because they commit more crime'. Permed right there. Learned my lesson instantly on Discord and I'm sure Reddit is the same if you try that.
Wikipedia -should- not make interpretations of its own. That is one of the two problems with it, its editors absolutely are.Be sure you send a sample to Dear Leader.
Would a primary source of that be statistics of crime rates by race? Then, the secondary sources would be news reports as an example. I would see a conclusion being supported by a primary source. However you'd interpret that is up to the individual. It's not like Wikipedia makes interpretations of its own. See Donald Trump.
The point of an encyclopedia is to provide information. The point of Wikipedia is to provide a surface level understanding of any given topic or subject. Raw data, and by extension leaving things up to interpretation, doesn't allow that. A single factoid is not an understanding. Idealy, wikipedia would be neutral and allow one to come to their own understanding after reading balanced and fair article. Wikipedia fails utterly at that, but its not due to an inherent issue with intent or design.THE HORROR
We can knock out two birds with one stone by allowing conservative sources and also allowing primary sources. If your problem of needing surface-level information is true, you could just have a simplified version of the site, but I doubt it's as big of an issue as you make it.In short, focusing on it not allowing primary sources is firing your gun at the wrong target. Aim instead at the sheer level of bias its actual sources and its users have.
Ill give him this one for once . Half the reason people are skeptical of the Holocaust is because of how blatant shit like Khmer Rouge was, with no attempt or need to hide the body's. That's not even touching how the communist holocausts (which had some interesting early life leaders) were far more horrific and killed more people then the Nazis ever did.
I'm pretty sure most of that was due to disease. There's been some evidence to suggest that there were a couple million Indians on the continent before we came down and inadvertently brought germs they couldn't handle. And no I'm pretty sure the small pox blankets were bullshit.hell yeah we killed a lot more people before the jews we were just more proficient with them (((according to official statistics))))
suck it kikes
Because I ironically and unironically enjoyed it.Why'd you have to remind me that exists.
Conservative sources are already allowed per the rules. See the two issues with Wikipedia as it is now for why they are not 'allowed'. That again is not a flaw with Wikipedia itself but rather a flaw with its good-intentioned but realistically fucked founding.We can knock out two birds with one stone by allowing conservative sources and also allowing primary sources. If your problem of needing surface-level information is true, you could just have a simplified version of the site, but I doubt it's as big of an issue as you make it.
I guess this is meant to be some sort of liberal gotcha, like "HAHA THIS TRANSPHOBIC REPUBLICAN WAS CAUGHT ON CAM IN DRAG!!" but it just made me realize how incredibly fast trannies took over society, the image was taken in 2012, Adam Sandler's Jake and Jill came out at the end of 2011, men in drag were considered a funny joke to the general public, now they're a sacred cow.This is from preddit so take it with a huge grain of salt but this is apparently a pic of Vance at some party dressed as a woman in college
View attachment 6296775
This is the source apparently
View attachment 6296782
An encyclopedia is a tertiary source, which is supposed to combine secondary sources to come up with the summary information that all these sources agree upon, or ‘scholarly consensus’. The problem is that primary sources would normally be fine for simple statements of fact, because simple statements of fact don’t need interpretation, and it’s presumed you will not be a moron and use the best primary source available. Wikipedia is retarded and likes to dispute simple statements of facts from being added either because it’s ‘not notable’ or it’s not found in ‘reliable secondary sources’.Does Wikipedia consider itself a primary source? A primary source should be the main story, with the secondary source providing supplementary context FROM the primary.
That is so true. You can get away with a little bit of 'real' Britannica style sources in papers, but using wiki as a source even from the start was always a big F. I simply never understood why people use lazy sources. You can get an A on a good university paper if you just go to a real library and use an ISBN (most teachers don't even think of checking if those are real, but no need to fake it) and you can quote and parse most of your paper.This is the actual reason why kids are not supposed to cite Wikipedia in school essays. An essay is a response or summarization to one or more primary or secondary sources, so you would not cite a tertiary source for such a thing. It has nothing to do with Wikipedia’s reliability. Citing Brittanica would be equally as retarded. But kids are apparently too retarded to understand the hierarchy of sources so teachers came up with this straw man about reliability.
New pasta just dropped.I can’t believe I’m actually jumping in here…
I’m actually curious to see what her downstairs looks like- I bet it ain’t bad. Neatly trimmed and still moist. Probably a slight degree of slack, despite not being used for birthing, but it still possesses a firm, enjoyable grip. Remember, this is a woman who fucked and sucked her way to where she is now. Considering that…the pussy game has to be somewhat decent. Otherwise, her vapid, dithering, unintelligent self would not have made it up all of those rungs. The powerful men would’ve tossed her roofied ass to the curb with a load stuck to her back, followed by a handful of greasy dollar bills for cab fare.
She probably gives suck jobs on par with, or better than, Mel Gibson’s mail-order Russian bride (and you just know she got on her knees and serviced that glorious, Apocalypto-directing cock like an absolute pro).
That all being said…I don’t think she’d be a great fuck. At least as far as my tastes are concerned. Don‘t get me wrong- I enjoy both MILFs and melanated poontang (lost my virginity to a black BBW prostitute many years ago), but I doubt CumAllah would be a fulfilling experience. You’d need mandatory usage of earplugs to 1.) get/maintain an erection, as well as 2.) not fly into a rage that makes you punch her in the cunt until her labia are black and blue. And who wants to fuck in earplugs? No thanks.
At this point, i understand why schools don't see them as accurate. Especially when i see wiki's bias surface every now and than.Did you idiots even go to school?
When Wikipedia was banned for sources in school you just reference the stuff in the Wikipedia reference section and nobody ever said anything. This worked all the way through grad school! Wikipedia as a primary source has been banned in higher education since like the late 00s.
People were getting their cars firebombed because of Trump stickers so that may have something to do with it. It's why I don't have one on mine, despite really enjoying the idea of causing malignant hypertension in N-95-wearing wine aunts driving red Kia Souls.I wonder if people even do bumper stickers anymore because so many cars were getting keyed the last 2.
According to Kapp, MacKay’s 2015 Nissan Titan was engulfed in flames when firefighters arrived.
The pickup “had ‘Trump’ spray painted on the left side, and coincidentally, had pro-Trump stickers on the bumper,” Kapp said.
The Vancouver Fire Marshal was called to investigate. Additional information about the fire was not immediately available.
MacKay said he believes someone torched his truck due to the pro-President Donald Trump stickers. He spoke to a witness who said there was an expletive spray-painted on the driver’s side before the word “Trump” that had been burned off in the fire.
“If politics and hate for Trump was the driving force behind it, that person needs help,” MacKay said.
MacKay put the two bumper stickers on his truck a few days before the fire. Both read “Trump 2020,” and one read “Make liberals cry again,” while the other read “Keep America Great.”
Seems like a clever way to tag Lefty vehicles, IMO. Then Lefties burn each other like they always do.People were getting their cars firebombed because of Trump stickers so that may have something to do with it. It's why I don't have one on mine, despite really enjoying the idea of causing malignant hypertension in N-95-wearing wine aunts driving red Kia Souls.
View attachment 6298752
Old and busted: the industrial revolutionNew pasta just dropped.
Also, what a terrible day to be literate.