Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 156 40.4%

  • Total voters
    386
For what fucking purpose would you begin tweeting to the world that you believe the county stuck you with intentional malpractice to fuck you and anyone else they hate specifically over? That feels like a pretty explicit claim to make that's hard to walk back as just insinuating.
It's so he can stroke his ego, nothing more or less.

The claim doesn't even make sense on the face of it since CHIPS openly stated their intended goal was to reunite the family, and that is what has happened, and it's the most common outcome in all of these cases.

Why would the state only offer incompetent lawyers out, when that would be antithetical to both their stated aims, and the aims that can be surmised by their actions?

Nick here is openly declaring that this is a potential conspiracy, since he is claiming the state intentionally only appoints poor council so it can fuck over parents.

Then he seemingly brings up the fact these attorneys face ethics complaints... Maybe I am missing the point here, didn't Nick do an entire segment mocking the complaints which he received. Plus, woah wow, junkies complained about their lawyers? Sounds like they're terrible lawyers... Not the junkies being junkies at all, no way.
 
One of the most obnoxious things he does comes from how he delivers every jokes like he's expecting the laugh. It's not just the pacing, but the tone as well. Good comedians make telling a joke basically effortless, using the same tone and cadence of telling a story or holding a conversation.

Nick always tries to joke-rape his audience by delivering every "joke" with the tone of laughing at his own joke before he even gets it out. It comes across as very smug, like he knows he has a zinger, and the audience exists to give him the feedback he wants. He insists on the joke's humor, rather than letting the joke land naturally.

The Denny's Joke is probably the best example of this. Just look at how hard he tries to force that joke down Kurt's throat in an attempt to force him to laugh.
He delivers jokes like there's an inaudible, invisible laugh track only he can hear.

All he's missing is him saying "bazinga" after the punch line.
 
Except… When was the last time “Rekieta Law” actually had a case or operated as a law firm?
This year! He represented your girl April on her speeding ticket! Remember?
Also this year.
1723502483564.png
 
He delivers jokes like there's an inaudible, invisible laugh track only he can hear.
Somehow the audience never laughs. They sit there in stone-faced silence, wondering when a punch line is ever going to appear.

And Nick, pathetic loser that he is, blames the audience for not laughing at his zero-humor "jokes."

Because in his tiny little mind, it's the fault of the audience that they aren't laughing when he isn't being funny because he is too fucking stupid to deliver a joke that actually makes an audience laugh.
 
I see that this thread is almost at 6k pages. Wouldn't it be WEIRD and FUNNY if we here at the farms got a 6k gift before the locals cucks got their 5k gift from Nick? Perhaps a little piece of celebratory art or something. Preferably featuring cute Kiwis and the slobbermutt. I don't know I just think it'd be funny. I'm not telling you to do anything, or whatever, I just wanted you to know. That it'd be funny.
Wouldn't the REAL 6k gift be all the friends we made along the way? ;)
 
Nick here is openly declaring that this is a potential conspiracy, since he is claiming the state intentionally only appoints poor council so it can fuck over parents.
Correct.

But let's be real here. Even if he wasn't playing up this evil government conspiracy shit, he'd probably still throw some sort of tantrum because he didn't get what he wanted now now NOW. He's a man baby, and he's going through something he's not fully in control of. A point which he's conceded through his "I am under the thumb of government" caterwauling.

Some people handle things like this with an air of grace. Nick does not.
 
So now Nick has offered up a new conspiracy involving the county deliberately offering incompetent and/or corrupt legal representation to parents presumably to steal children. After listening to Barnes describe how Nick arrest was political retaliation and an attempt to silence him, I sure think it would be a good idea if as much information as possible about this case were released to the public. Its a serious matter of public interest.

Nick's claims that the entire county government, county judges and local attorneys are conspiring together against parents deserve the fullest possible investigation
 
Imagine being a THIEF. Like Nick. A thieving liar who promised to deliver something and arrogantly refuses and scoffs at the very idea anyone expects a worm like him to live up to his word.
Have you considered that because they don't LOVE him anymore they don't DESERVE the 5k gift?
IMG_1633.png


Add that to the affidavit! I'm starting to feel a sneaking suspicion that Kandiyohi County is conspiring against Balldo enjoyers, and the only remedy is bodycam footage.
I believe there's a Kandiyohi County conspiracy against the true and honest parents.

I want rekieta humbled, his smugness is annoying. When the judge is putting him into pound rekieta in the ass penitentiary?
At this point what could humble him? He may make tactical moves (such as taking a plea deal to bury the bodycams) but I don't believe he is able to be humbled.

So now Nick has offered up a new conspiracy involving the county deliberately offering incompetent and/or corrupt legal representation to parents presumably to steal children. After listening to Barnes describe how Nick arrest was political retaliation and an attempt to silence him, I sure think it would be a good idea if as much information as possible about this case were released to the public. Its a serious matter of public interest.

Nick's claims that the entire county government, county judges and local attorneys are conspiring together against parents deserve the fullest possible investigation
At this point each and every trial in Kandiyohi County is as credible as show trials under Stalin.
 
This year! He represented your girl April on her speeding ticket! Remember?

I mean, he DIDN'T DO A FUCKING THING, no-showed, and she was automatically convicted, but he IS listed on the official docket as being her defense attorney on that case.

Just for the sake of completeness, it should be remembered that Nick no-showed the hearing which was over ZOOM CALL and refused to even make the tiny effort to reschedule it. He didn't even have to leave the house or get dressed to take care of it.
 
So now Nick has offered up a new conspiracy involving the county deliberately offering incompetent and/or corrupt legal representation to parents presumably to steal children. After listening to Barnes describe how Nick arrest was political retaliation and an attempt to silence him, I sure think it would be a good idea if as much information as possible about this case were released to the public. Its a serious matter of public interest.

Nick testifying to so many government malfeasances...
I now believe the rumor that some corrupt cop may have planted the cocaine has some credence.
Kandiyohi County officials should publish the bodycam footage to help elucidate these rumors.
 
Last edited:
Just for the sake of completeness, it should be remembered that Nick no-showed the hearing which was over ZOOM CALL and refused to even make the tiny effort to reschedule it. He didn't even have to leave the house or get dressed to take care of it.

It's hard to keep your appointments when you've got an ounce of coke in the house. That crack isn't going to smoke itself.

I'll just have one last pipe and then I'll do it, I promise...
 
Null needs Barnes's bullshit to make his case it is in the public interest to release the Rekieta bodycam.
It should be more. Here's my list YMMV

1. The state took children away from a resident in good standing that is admitted to the MN bar with no criminal history. Part of the basis for that removal was the condition of the home. The PUBLIC has the right to see what conditions triggered that removal beyond the word "cluttered."
2. Rekieta disputes that his home was in a condition that warranted removal.
3. Rekieta has alleged the person that took custody of the children for KCHHS lied to the court.
4. Directly and through proxies, Rekieta has alleged malfeasance by the police, prosecutor, the courts (GAL) and KCHHS.
5. Confidence in child protective services is always a public concern and releasing the body cam footage will help determine if that confidence is misplaced.

At the very least, ask the court to order a redacted version (juvenile faces and identities removed) of the body cam footage to ensure the public that the condition of the home was such to justify removal. The public needs to know what constitutes justification for child removal to remain confident in KCHHS. Statements by Rekieta make the bodycam release even more imperative as he alleges it was not justified. Transparency requires the release of the video so the public can assess whether Rekieta's claims have merit and whether confidence in KCHHS is misplaced.

Parties to the case should be ordered to respond to the motion with whether they consent or object to releasing the video and what would cure their objection.
 
Nick loses in both cases. Sean is correct.
I figured, but I wanted to highlight in particular the absurdity and hypocrisy of Nick trying to make hay over where Sean is licensed and practices. Since when has that ever been a problem for Lawtube?

Nick isn't licensed in Virginia (Depp v. Heard) or Wisconsin (State v. Rittenhouse). That didn't stop him from making bank off commentating on either case.

Sean does it in Nick's case and Nick suddenly thinks Sean should kill himself make a million dolkars eat a sandwich. Nick would have a better appearing argument if he pointed out specifically how he thinks Sean is wrong on MN law but, of course, we know why he won't.

Just for the sake of completeness, it should be remembered that Nick no-showed the hearing which was over ZOOM CALL and refused to even make the tiny effort to reschedule it. He didn't even have to leave the house or get dressed to take care of it.
Yes, but even a Zoom would be very problematic for him if he were fucked up at that time.

My headcanon is he was passed out in a pool of his own piss or vomit when that hearing occurred. It may or may not be true, but it's certainly funny, so I'm just gonna keep thinking it.
 
Back