- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
It's so he can stroke his ego, nothing more or less.For what fucking purpose would you begin tweeting to the world that you believe the county stuck you with intentional malpractice to fuck you and anyone else they hate specifically over? That feels like a pretty explicit claim to make that's hard to walk back as just insinuating.
The claim doesn't even make sense on the face of it since CHIPS openly stated their intended goal was to reunite the family, and that is what has happened, and it's the most common outcome in all of these cases.
Why would the state only offer incompetent lawyers out, when that would be antithetical to both their stated aims, and the aims that can be surmised by their actions?
Nick here is openly declaring that this is a potential conspiracy, since he is claiming the state intentionally only appoints poor council so it can fuck over parents.
Then he seemingly brings up the fact these attorneys face ethics complaints... Maybe I am missing the point here, didn't Nick do an entire segment mocking the complaints which he received. Plus, woah wow, junkies complained about their lawyers? Sounds like they're terrible lawyers... Not the junkies being junkies at all, no way.