Culture Disney wants NYU doctor allergy death suit tossed because of widower’s Disney+ subscription - Disney argued that the Disney+ subscriber agreement Piccolo signed years earlier on his PlayStation called for any dispute to be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

1723580333447.png

Disney is trying to get a wrongful death lawsuit filed by a New York University doctor’s grieving husband tossed — because he signed up for the Disney+ streaming service years earlier, court papers said.

Kanokporn Tangsuan’s bereaved husband Jeffrey Piccolo is currently suing the theme park juggernaut claiming that she suffered a fatal allergic reaction shortly after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant in Florida last October.

But Disney is now claiming the $50,000 suit should be moved out of the courts because Piccolo agreed to arbitrate all disputes with the company when he first signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service back in 2019, court documents charge.

Piccolo’s attorneys, on their part, have slammed Disney’s latest motion as “preposterous” and “outrageously unreasonable.”

In the May 31 motion filed in Orange County, Fla. circuit court, Disney argued that the Disney+ subscriber agreement Piccolo signed years earlier on his PlayStation called for any dispute — with the exception of small claims — to be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

The company added that Piccolo agreed to similar language when he then used the “My Disney Experience” app to buy tickets to visit the Epcot theme park in September last year — a month before the ill-fated trip.

Disney has argued that both agreements required Piccolo to consent to the arbitration language before purchasing, the court filings claim.

Piccolo’s lawyers have since fired back, insisting in an Aug. 2 motion that Disney’s argument is “fatally flawed.”

“The notion that terms agreed to by a consumer when creating a Disney+ free trial account would forever bar that consumer’s right to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this court should not enforce such an agreement,” the lawyers wrote.

They also argue that Piccolo filed the wrongful death suit as the “personal representative of the estate of Kanokporn Tangsuan” and not on behalf of himself.

Tangsuan, 42, died of a severe allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis just hours after dining at the Raglan Road Irish Pub and Restaurant with her husband back on Oct. 5, the original complaint said.

The physician, who had worked Manhattan’s NYU Langone hospital, had repeatedly stressed to wait staff that she had nut and dairy allergies when she ordered scallops, onion rings, broccoli and corn fritters, according to the filing.

Soon after leaving the restaurant, Tangsuan started experiencing difficulty breathing and collapsed, court papers charge.

Even though an epi-pen was immediately administered to her, she died at a local hospital, the lawsuit said.

Piccolo is seeking more than $50,000 in damages under Florida’s wrongful death act, in addition to mental pain and suffering, loss of income and funeral expenses.

The Post reached out to both Disney and Piccolo’s attorneys for comment.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-ne...h-suit-tossed-because-of-disney-subscription/ (Archive)
 
Not gonna lie, it's pretty impressive that Disney decided to try this track. I hope this kills these god awful eulas.
Yeah, this seems like a really risky position. If this is the Hail Mary they are tossing out, they are probably guilty as sin for this woman's death. Either that, or they've used this EULA excuse so many times in the past and it is only catching flak now. I just don't see how a workable justice system could let something like this stand, hitting "accept" on a EULA for an unrelated product allows them to force arbitration for any legal action against them in perpetuity? That's ridiculously broad.
 
Doctor who has deadly allergy to food orders food from a kitchen filled with food she is deathly allergic to and dies.

Who could have possibly seen this coming.
It's probably a good thing she died before she killed any of her patients with her lack of understanding how allergies work.
 
I recall Disney's allergy policy is "we'll try, we can suggest the food places that are least likely to hit you badly accidentally, but if you're REALLY that damn allergic it's on your ass if you don't bring your own shit"
 
It's FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS that's not even a full Quasi! I'm surprised disney wanted to buy the bad press around this instead of just, you know, letting their insurance eat the $50k.
It's almost like the Mouse is running out of money, and willing to try anything, including the scummiest legal theories available, to get out of lawsuits?

And to test if they'll work? The first thing they'll try it on is a piddly little suit that isn't gonna run them a million bucks....

Lose? You're out $50K

Win? You never have to pay out for anyone ever again, as long as they left clicked on an ad at some point in the past.......
 
Haven't the courts already effectively ruled that EULAs don't mean shit and are unenforceable? The day of the mouse trap cannot come soon enough for these scumbags.

Kinda but at the same time courts have also upheld these malevolent arbitration clauses.

I think it’s kinda fucked that a corporation can de-facto rob you of a constitutional right because of a jumble of legalese bullshit they and the courts know nobody ever reads.
 
I'm seeing nothing on the menu with nuts, and dairy allergies aren't usually of the anaphylactic type. Unless they use peanut oil in the fryers... And the server should know that. I would hate to be the cook that killed someone accidentally because a server didn't communicate. Anyway, the restaurant now has a very prominently displayed CYA statement on their website.
 
Last edited:
I'm seeing nothing on the menu with nuts, and dairy allergies aren't usually of the anaphylactic type. Unless they use peanut oil in the fryers... And the server should know that. I would hate to be the cook that killed someone accidentally because a server didn't communicate. Anyway, the restaurant now has a very prominently displayed CYA statement on their website.
Most people with peanut allergy are fine with peanut oil.
 
I'm seeing nothing on the menu with nuts, and dairy allergies aren't usually of the anaphylactic type. Unless they use peanut oil in the fryers... And the server should know that. I would hate to be the cook that killed someone accidentally because a server didn't communicate. Anyway, the restaurant now has a very prominently displayed CYA statement on their website.
depending on the location there's a lot of spots at Disney World that are the kitchen to more than one front
 
Back