African-American Appreciation Thread - Highlighting contributions from our most productive citizens

That lack of animal domestication is what really opened my eyes when I was a kid. They never even tried! Africa has dogs, falcons, horses (zebra), camels (giraffes), elephants, I'll toss cheetahs in there as their own unique candidate. We talk about how Native Americans hunted the native horses instead of domesticating them, but those guys still had fucking dogs. Africa has all those animals, or close enough, but they never once did anything but eat them. It's just insane.
The problem with african fauna is that they are the meanest bastards to ever set foot on the earth when it comes to dealing with humans. They have adapted to defending from tribal human tactics of both herding, domestication, and hunting for millenia, otherwise they would have gone extinct long ago. That's the same reason as to why you can tame an asiatic elephant pretty easily, but the african ones are simply a lost cause when it comes to getting them to obey you out of their own volition, the fuckers know what we are up to.

The surprise factor is what led to wooly mammoths and the rest of non-african megafauna to extinction, if they had time to adapt their behavior to the presence of humans, they would have survived
 
The problem with african fauna is that they are the meanest bastards to ever set foot on the earth when it comes to dealing with humans. They have adapted to defending from tribal human tactics of both herding, domestication, and hunting for millenia, otherwise they would have gone extinct long ago. That's the same reason as to why you can tame an asiatic elephant pretty easily, but the african ones are simply a lost cause when it comes to getting them to obey you out of their own volition, the fuckers know what we are up to.

The surprise factor is what led to wooly mammoths and the rest of non-african megafauna to extinction, if they had time to adapt their behavior to the presence of humans, they would have survived
See, I don't buy this.

Everything starts mean and wild. Today's horses and cows were mean, independent, self sufficient creatures just like the African animals are today. The difference is, the people fucking tried. Now, thousands of years later, we have these docile animals that haven't had to be mean or independent because humans spent time and effort making them that way.

If Africans have existed for as long as every other race, then they had the same thousands of years timeframe as the rest of humanity. And they did jack shit.

The animals there are unchanged and primitive. It's as close to a modern recreation of the Stone Age as you can possibly get. And the people are no different.
 
See, I don't buy this.

Everything starts mean and wild. Today's horses and cows were mean, independent, self sufficient creatures just like the African animals are today. The difference is, the people fucking tried. Now, thousands of years later, we have these docile animals that haven't had to be mean or independent because humans spent time and effort making them that way.

If Africans have existed for as long as every other race, then they had the same thousands of years timeframe as the rest of humanity. And they did jack shit.

The animals there are unchanged and primitive. It's as close to a modern recreation of the Stone Age as you can possibly get. And the people are no different.
They weren't as mean as african fauna. If they were, then humanity wouldn't have expanded as quickly as they did. Horses also have much more of a herd mentality than zebras, if you manage to tame the leader of a herd of horses (even wild horses, such as the mustangs that can be found in the great plains), the rest of the group will obey you. With zebras this is different, as they have much more independence. Zebras are the earliest species of equines to diverge from the modern horse, aside from the onager (which is also undomesticated). Their more primitive social structure just makes it fruitless to try to domesticate them
 
They weren't as mean as african fauna. If they were, then humanity wouldn't have expanded as quickly as they did. Horses also have much more of a herd mentality than zebras, if you manage to tame the leader of a herd of horses (even wild horses, such as the mustangs that can be found in the great plains), the rest of the group will obey you. With zebras this is different, as they have much more independence. Zebras are the earliest species of equines to diverge from the modern horse, aside from the onager (which is also undomesticated). Their more primitive social structure just makes it fruitless to try to domesticate them
Yea but your basically just saying they are untameable because niggers couldn't tame them

I don't see how comparing to modern animals even really tracks because wild cows don't exist anymore and wild horses are probably forever changed just like pigs and cows are
 
They weren't as mean as african fauna. If they were, then humanity wouldn't have expanded as quickly as they did. Horses also have much more of a herd mentality than zebras, if you manage to tame the leader of a herd of horses (even wild horses, such as the mustangs that can be found in the great plains), the rest of the group will obey you. With zebras this is different, as they have much more independence. Zebras are the earliest species of equines to diverge from the modern horse, aside from the onager (which is also undomesticated). Their more primitive social structure just makes it fruitless to try to domesticate them
I know they're called wild horses, but they're not wild animals. Mustangs are descendants of Spanish horses and other English breeds. They can be tamed and trained like regular horses because they're domesticated animals that have gone feral. A couple hundred years on their own hasn't erased the thousands of years that went into creating them.

In your last post, you made a good point about how African animals adapted to fend off humans. It's like a reverse domestication. Like, after constant war with the humans on their continent, they've gotten much bolder and meaner. Most animals in the rest of the world try to avoid humans, but Africa has gone the other way. That's pretty cool to think about.
 
New statistics show 66 children under the age of 14 have contracted sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Western Australia over the past three years.
Sexual initiation of kids is traditional. As is beating your wives. Polygamy is common. A anthropological dig uncovered female skulls that had injuries consistent with a lifetime of of beating with blunt instruments.
Haven eaten the megafauna Abos were dying inbreds. The Tasmanian aborigines forgot how to fish or make boats.



Abo culture is unintentionally hilarious in how primitive and retarded it is. Here are some excerpts from a book from 1898 explaining some of those injuries:

GUwT5hAaIAASI6m.png
GUw45e2a4AAVIou.png

Randomly light-heartedly clubbing each other in the head every once in a while be dey kulcha n shiet.
 
Yea but your basically just saying they are untameable because niggers couldn't tame them

I don't see how comparing to modern animals even really tracks because wild cows don't exist anymore and wild horses are probably forever changed just like pigs and cows are
Wild horses and wild pigs are not that different from their ancestors, otherwise they wouldn't be able to revert back to a savage stage so successfully. And onagers are not an african animal, they are in fact from the same region that the (old world) horses are from, central asia. The fact that the same people could domesticate one but not the other is proof that the blame is not (entirely) on the africans
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: geckogoy

According to this book, without the black population, crime rates in the US would be approaching those of Canada/European countries. I highly recommend it! The author recommends policies that target bad social environments.

I also believe lower crime rates would make it easier to get away from stupid policies such as high mandatory minimums, mass incarceration and capital punishment.

More security also means lower costs in general (i.e because if lower shrinkage at detail locations).

You know the stat about how illegal immigrants in the USA commit less crime than native born Americans? It’s true. But the caveat is that it’s only true because of how massively outsized crime is from niggers. Remove niggers and the data shows illegals commit more crime, remove spices and illegals commit twice the amount of violent crime as native non-Hispanic whites and nearly 2-3 the amount of crime for other types of offenses, such as DUI/DWI.

When viewing FBI crime stats (or any USA gov’t data that tracks demographics, really), it’s important to remember that Hispanic is an ethnicity, not a race, so you often need to remove Hispanic metrics from the White metrics to find the rates for non-Hispanic whites. When you remove Hispanics from white crime, you further drop crime rates significantly. (Black Hispanics are statistically insignificant in the USA, as they account for less than 0.5% of the population) Hispanics tend to commit violent crime at a volume similar to that of non-Hispanic whites, but their population representation is 1/3 that of whites, basically meaning that they commit violent crime at a rate of x3 that of non-Hispanic whites. Get rid of spics and niggers and you’ve eliminated roughly 80% of all violent crime.

People have no real context for how insanely high violent crime rate is for niggers. It’s so fucking high that 20% to 25% of American black men will be incarcerated at some point in their life. Go back to the 90’s and it was over 30%. Not merely arrested. Literally sentenced to serve time in prison or jail. Jungle fever libs spin this as a matter of racism-based injustice, in an attempt to garner sympathy, rather than as a facet of reality that should be horrifying in its implications.
 
See, I don't buy this.

Everything starts mean and wild. Today's horses and cows were mean, independent, self sufficient creatures just like the African animals are today. The difference is, the people fucking tried.
Honestly, the real difference is that Europeans understand the concept of property.

There's a copy-pasta that I don't have handy, but it's about how individuals in Africa can't actually own anything because other people take it; they can't start a business and make a profit because 100 different people, claiming to be family or even just fellow tribesmen, demand a share (that they didn't earn). It turns out that their languages don't even have words for concepts like property or obligation.

They literally just don't understand it!

And you see this even in modern blacks, even in the US. You can't own much, because anything not physically in your possession gets taken - you've seen videos of them stealing bikes as if it's compulsive, as if they literally cannot help themselves. Ownership is not possible in that sort of culture.

Screen Shot 2024-08-14 at 7.47.50 AM.png


How does this relate to domestication? Well, aside from dogs (who are a special case of domestication) every domestication event stems from ownership - from ranching. You have to build a fenced corral and drive animals into it, or cages to capture them. Then you have to feed and care for the animals in order to breed them.

And you have to do that for hundreds of generations! You have to own the animals and their offspring for a long, long time. Ownership - the concept of ownership - is a prerequisite to domestication.

But they cannot understand ownership. Sure, they covet, they desire, they understand possession (having something in hand) but not the abstract concept of ownership.

(and just to be clear, when I say "they" I mean "the group" irrespective of individual capabilities - I'm well aware that some individual blacks do understand these concepts, and that some individual whites don't understand, but that's irrelevant to my point)
 
This is all very well put
In fact there are many concepts that are required for domestication that Africans show an inability to conceptualize

Pattern recognition (the lack of which explains their inability to notice the chirp chirp) is required to observe the subtle changes in an animal that would be preferable to breed for
Patience, theoretical thinking and future planning are needed to consider what could possibly happen in the future if you were to breed to select traits, and then choosing to undergo such a task

TLDR "What would've happened if you domesticated these animals?" "But I didn't domesticate them"
 
There's a copy-pasta that I don't have handy, but it's about how individuals in Africa can't actually own anything because other people take it; they can't start a business and make a profit because 100 different people, claiming to be family or even just fellow tribesmen, demand a share (that they didn't earn). It turns out that their languages don't even have words for concepts like property or obligation.

This one?
Anon-africa.jpg


Pattern recognition (the lack of which explains their inability to notice the chirp chirp) is required to observe the subtle changes in an animal that would be preferable to breed for
Patience, theoretical thinking and future planning are needed to consider what could possibly happen in the future if you were to breed to select traits, and then choosing to undergo such a task
In Africa (see copypasta above) there's no need for forward thinking. Everything you could need is there, and the climate is almost always perfect. There is no need to plan for the future.

Meanwhile, in Europe, you have winter taking at least four or five months out of the year to try and kill you, so you need to figure out how to stay warm and gather food for the winter. You need to grow enough to last not only the winter, but until the next harvest at least. You also need to account for rats, blight, and theft. You need to raise walls and armies, because Bjorn and his buddies have decided taking your shit is easier than growing it for themselves.

Japan had something similar happen. They'd spent their time fighting off Chang and his mongrel buddies, and confined any European traders to the southernmost island, and things worked out well for a while; they didn't need to change. When Admiral Perry came along, many Japanese realized, "Oh shit, if America can do this in less than a century, what'll happen forty or fifty years down the line?" This would kick off the Meiji restoration, which is how Japan became the powerhouse it was in World War 2.

Even India almost but not quite had something like that happen. Tipu Sultan, the legendary Tiger of Mysore, saw the British encroachment and realized he would be fucked if he didn't adapt to British technology and modernize India. He would succeed intially, and after four wars the British would kill him and take over. Others would try to follow in his footsteps, but they'd never reach the success he did.

As for Africa? Nothing like that ever happened. When the colonial powers invaded in the mid-1800s, the most advanced technology they found were a few rusty bicycles and a couple of ancient muskets. Without the Europeans exchanging technology for slaves, the Africans had regressed back to their original tribal state. They never bothered to learn how to maintain what they were given; if anything broke, they could just wait for the Europeans to come and replace it. They had no written language, only oral traditions that we know about because some Christian or Muslim wrote it down. Why would they need to record anything? They want for nothing in the jungle; there's no need to record how many bananas we have and if it'll be enough to last until the next rainy season.

In America, we have something similar. They don't need to worry about working for food; the government will provide it. They don't need to think about the consequences of their actions, they'll get off scott-free. They don't need to worry about anything. Whites turn a blind eye, either willingly or at the threat of a lynch mob, so niggers are free to be niggers. It is only when the threat of consequences are removed that Whites are able to handle niggers (see also: Rooftop Koreans).

Here's another copypasta about the endless present that the nigger lives in:
nigger time.png
 
New statistics show 66 children under the age of 14 have contracted sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Western Australia over the past three years.
Sexual initiation of kids is traditional. As is beating your wives. Polygamy is common. A anthropological dig uncovered female skulls that had injuries consistent with a lifetime of of beating with blunt instruments.
Haven eaten the megafauna Abos were dying inbreds. The Tasmanian aborigines forgot how to fish or make boats.



This gives me don't be rama rama vibes

yaas syphilis.jpg


I hope she realizes that Black people kill people like her when they find out.
 
I think I might want to retract my statement, this builder guy is terrible and maybe its a black thing. Without getting into boring details, I'm doing renovations with a household furniture place and they send their own guys to do the job, sent me this African dude.
Did you not have a contract with this guy or his company? I hope you've been taking pictures of everything
And not that it's any comfort but the construction industry has gotten pretty bad after the whole covid thing. Illegal workers or not, a lot of them are short staffed or hiring poor workers just to try to get things done. Or they themselves have gotten very corrupt/lazy and dragging their feet because they can.

It's funny, seeing people saying that Africa was impossible to settle because the beasts couldn't be domesticated, there was too much disease, that the natural resources were too difficult to get to.
In your last post, you made a good point about how African animals adapted to fend off humans. It's like a reverse domestication. Like, after constant war with the humans on their continent, they've gotten much bolder and meaner. Most animals in the rest of the world try to avoid humans, but Africa has gone the other way. That's pretty cool to think about.
The truth is always somewhere in the middle, I think there are legitimate geographical limitations on cultures. Evolution isn't 'survival of the strongest', it's survival of the good enough, and if nothing really has to change then it won't. It's just very difficult to validate from our general perspective.
Animals also do evolve to see humans as a natural predator (sperm whales are said to still have memories about the whaling era and elephants regularly take revenge on pajeet villages), just as some saw humans as potential allies (dogs, cats, honeybirds) so it's not crazy to think African animals, already used to bullshit like hippos and crocodiles evolved to be too difficult to work with. Take this in contrast to loveable retards like penguins who will try to hang out with researchers because they haven't learned to fear being shaken like a bag of nuggets by human hands.
But even I can't help but wonder if the Africans tried and failed or if it just never occurred. Mongolians tamed the minor demons known as golden eagles and someone saw wild camels and thought dealing with that was a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Of course niggers don't like classical music. How dey s'pose ta twerk to dat sheeit? Dey ain't got no beets!

As an aside, this gentleman achieves the same result with opera:
>people experiencing homelessness

that aside a lot of studies were done to show that people with lower intellect listen more commonly to rap and hip hop music, whereas people with higher intellect listen more to opera and classical
what i wanna know is- is this a statistical phenomena, as in "niggers dumb AND they like rap, so they end up tipping the studies" or is it cause and effect aka "niggers like rap BECAUSE they dumb"

interestingly rock and metal are also considered high intellect music despite being more modern and viewed as less intellectual
and it's associated with european countries like sweden and iceland....... hmm....

This gives me don't be rama rama vibes

View attachment 6307799
you literally have to advertise lifesaving disease repelling precautionary behaviors as "hip" and "trendy" like you've advertising to kids cause they won't do it if it ain't on dat fleek yass queen
 
Last edited:

Now you spoiled the video which is why I said "she"

you literally have to advertise lifesaving disease repelling precautionary behaviors as "hip" and "trendy" like you've advertising to kids cause they won't do it if it ain't on dat fleek yass queen

That seems counter productive to me because if I was a low IQ "hip" and "trendy" kid and I saw that, I would just intentionally do the oppositve and fuck/get fucked and collect sexual diseases.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Rick The Stick
Back