Culture Disney wants NYU doctor allergy death suit tossed because of widower’s Disney+ subscription - Disney argued that the Disney+ subscriber agreement Piccolo signed years earlier on his PlayStation called for any dispute to be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

1723580333447.png

Disney is trying to get a wrongful death lawsuit filed by a New York University doctor’s grieving husband tossed — because he signed up for the Disney+ streaming service years earlier, court papers said.

Kanokporn Tangsuan’s bereaved husband Jeffrey Piccolo is currently suing the theme park juggernaut claiming that she suffered a fatal allergic reaction shortly after eating at a Disney Springs restaurant in Florida last October.

But Disney is now claiming the $50,000 suit should be moved out of the courts because Piccolo agreed to arbitrate all disputes with the company when he first signed up for a one-month trial of the Disney+ streaming service back in 2019, court documents charge.

Piccolo’s attorneys, on their part, have slammed Disney’s latest motion as “preposterous” and “outrageously unreasonable.”

In the May 31 motion filed in Orange County, Fla. circuit court, Disney argued that the Disney+ subscriber agreement Piccolo signed years earlier on his PlayStation called for any dispute — with the exception of small claims — to be “resolved by individual binding arbitration.”

The company added that Piccolo agreed to similar language when he then used the “My Disney Experience” app to buy tickets to visit the Epcot theme park in September last year — a month before the ill-fated trip.

Disney has argued that both agreements required Piccolo to consent to the arbitration language before purchasing, the court filings claim.

Piccolo’s lawyers have since fired back, insisting in an Aug. 2 motion that Disney’s argument is “fatally flawed.”

“The notion that terms agreed to by a consumer when creating a Disney+ free trial account would forever bar that consumer’s right to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this court should not enforce such an agreement,” the lawyers wrote.

They also argue that Piccolo filed the wrongful death suit as the “personal representative of the estate of Kanokporn Tangsuan” and not on behalf of himself.

Tangsuan, 42, died of a severe allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis just hours after dining at the Raglan Road Irish Pub and Restaurant with her husband back on Oct. 5, the original complaint said.

The physician, who had worked Manhattan’s NYU Langone hospital, had repeatedly stressed to wait staff that she had nut and dairy allergies when she ordered scallops, onion rings, broccoli and corn fritters, according to the filing.

Soon after leaving the restaurant, Tangsuan started experiencing difficulty breathing and collapsed, court papers charge.

Even though an epi-pen was immediately administered to her, she died at a local hospital, the lawsuit said.

Piccolo is seeking more than $50,000 in damages under Florida’s wrongful death act, in addition to mental pain and suffering, loss of income and funeral expenses.

The Post reached out to both Disney and Piccolo’s attorneys for comment.

https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-ne...h-suit-tossed-because-of-disney-subscription/ (Archive)
 
This is definitely a move from a lawyer who thinks they're more clever than they actually are.

For starters, because this is in the Orange County, Fla. circuit court instead of the Federal Circuit Court, Disney doesn't have the benefit of the Federal Arbitration Act, which means that they have to rely on whatever laws Florida has in regards to Arbitration Clauses and basic Contract law.

And the Contract does not help Disney in that regard, because the Arbitration Clause itself is not that broad.

You and Disney DTC agree to arbitrate, as provided below, all disputes between you (including any related disputes involving The Walt Disney Company or its affiliates), that are not resolved informally, except disputes relating to the ownership or enforcement of intellectual property rights. “Dispute” includes any dispute, action, or other controversy, whether based on past, present, or future events, between you and us concerning the Disney Services or this Agreement, whether in contract, tort, warranty, statute, regulation, or other legal or equitable basis.

Disney DTC LLC and/or its affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively, “Disney DTC”) are pleased to provide to you their sites, software, applications, content, products and services (“Disney Services”), which may be branded Disney, ABC, ESPN, Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm, FX or another brand owned or licensed by Disney DTC.

The Disney Services are defined by the ToU, and based on the list and the company providing it (Disney DTC), the services are limited to the products and services that are offered by Disney's Direct to Consumer streaming products. Furthermore, Disputes are defined to include events concerning the defined Disney Services or the agreement itself, and there isn't any language stating that Dispute is not limited only to disputes, actions or other controversies concerning Disney Services. As such, it is likely that the injury here would not be a foreseeable result from the use of Disney DTC's services, and would be beyond the scope. There's also a complete lack of nexus between dining at the restaurant and a Disney+ free trial.

Pulling this out was a retarded move, and all it does is make people say "Fuck Disney." Whoever filed this was fucking retarded.
 
A reasonable juror after hearing the rat's lawyer make this argument: "What was Deadpool 3's box office take again? I think it should all go to this guy."

Yep. Literally what happened in the infamous McDonalds hot coffe spill lawsuit.

Granny asked for a few grand to pay for her surgery costs for the burns. A genius lawyer first denied it was that bad and later said a bunch of proceedure to reconstruct the granny's coochie were "purely cosmetic" because she was old and it wasn't like she was gonna have kids.

Jury just sorta decided to throw everything and the kitchen table at McDonalds after that. McD then spent millions spreading a fake news version to slander the granny making the accident sound a lot less bad and hiding their own blunders in turning the jury against them. If the suit had happened in 2002 instead of 1992 no one would have ever thougt it was frivolous like McD PR made it sound.
 
Batter for savory foods can be made with any liquid. Beer/seltzer water is better and what most restaurants use because the bubbles make the batter crispier and lighter.
These were corn fritters that she ate, all of the recipes I'd seen for corn fritters seem to involve milk. I know scallops are also sometimes soaked in milk if they've started getting a little 'fishy' so this or these could be the 'source' of at least the dairy contamination.
The problem was that the staff repeatedly said they could do it entirely allergen-free, which wasn't the case. It's the same reason why restaurants will offer a gluten-free crust then add numerous disclaimers that that it's prepared in a restaurant with gluten, no one is there to handle medical issues, and if you have celiac disease or something similar don't eat it.

It's important to note that the space was not operated by Disney's foodservice, but rather a leased space operated by Great Irish Pubs Florida, Inc. (only location) and owned by two Irishmen. I wonder why Disney is engaged in this bullshit and not pointing fingers at the real culprit.
Does anyone know if they list on the menus all the possible allergens the dishes could come in contact with in the kitchen? 'Prepared in a facility that uses or comes in contact with peanuts and dairy' would make it plain as day that you potentially eat at your own risk there, even if they do try to give you allergen-free food. The waiter or chef might have had a Reese's cup on break, or there might be a residue of peanut butter pie or peanut sauce on the pickup counter, so even then there are risks.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vecr
It's less the bubbles for beer and more the alcohol, it boils off at a lower temperature
If you ever want really crispy fried chicken make the batter by replacing half the water with vodka
It'll have so much more crunch and snap
Leave it to the dude with the black man as his icon to make good fried chicken :optimistic:

Ugh, I'll bet Google tries to use this same defense in the near future. :|
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Vecr
Plus, Walt hated the small hats. Now his company is the living embodiment of small hat business philosophy.

Walt didn’t hate Jews. He had several working for him, including the Sherman Brothers who wrote many famous Disney songs, including "It's a Small World" and several others for films, cartoons, rides, attractions, and anything else you can think of. I guess you also believe Walt is cryogenically frozen underneath the Castle at Disneyland and not very clearly buried next to his wife at a grave that anyone can visit.
 
I just don't see how a workable justice system could let something like this stand
welcome to America
Atleast her being an NYU doctor makes this somewhat headline-worthy, it'll be insanely fun to watch the brewing civil war between Corporate Jews and Legal Jews
 
Walt didn’t hate Jews. He had several working for him, including the Sherman Brothers who wrote many famous Disney songs, including "It's a Small World" and several others for films, cartoons, rides, attractions, and anything else you can think of. I guess you also believe Walt is cryogenically frozen underneath the Castle at Disneyland and not very clearly buried next to his wife at a grave that anyone can visit.
Yes, Walt was a man of honor by all accounts and I admire him. What current "disney" is and represents is sure proof that people cant come back as ghosts, because if they could Walt would have haunted everyone involved until they jumped out of a window over what they did to his creation.

All of this to avoid the tiny sum of $50,000, these are some evil demons and hopefully as others have said this results in an eventual millions of dollars award.
 
if you unsubscribe then you're no longer bound by eula right?
Incorrect. Listening to Sean go over this lawsuit (link), he takes a look at the EULA. It says it still applies even if you unsubscribe, and it applies forever:
didne.png

Oops, sorry, you signed up for a free 14 day trial version, you're on the hook forever retard. Shouldn't have let your kid watch Frozen.
 
Incorrect. Listening to Sean go over this lawsuit (link), he takes a look at the EULA. It says it still applies even if you unsubscribe, and it applies forever:
View attachment 6308845

Oops, sorry, you signed up for a free 14 day trial version, you're on the hook forever retard. Shouldn't have let your kid watch Frozen.
ah fuck, now im a slave.
 
Does anyone know if they list on the menus all the possible allergens the dishes could come in contact with in the kitchen? 'Prepared in a facility that uses or comes in contact with peanuts and dairy' would make it plain as day that you potentially eat at your own risk there, even if they do try to give you allergen-free food. The waiter or chef might have had a Reese's cup on break, or there might be a residue of peanut butter pie or peanut sauce on the pickup counter, so even then there are risks.

It seems like it would depend on the restaurant. Dairy, wheat, and egg are givens for most restaurants; stuff like shellfish is less likely (I mean, unless it's a seafood restaurant).

But if you actually look at the menu (archive), there's dairy in half the products. Buttermilk marinated fried chicken, a potato cake with cheese sauce, bread pudding, a chicken sandwich with grated parmesan, and so forth.

Can't find anything about nuts, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter
Disney is now claiming the $50,000 suit should be moved out of the courts
I really don't get that part. Does Disney even pay for this out of pocket? What about legal insurance or whatever? Even if they did pay out of pocket, that's pocket change for this corporation.
What a bizarre situation. No way the negative press doesn't cost them more than 50k.
 
I don't understand how this chick survived to adulthood. But I guess she was a doctor, not a chef so what do I know?

This Disney+ shit is twisted and evil though.
 
Back