Has Aella ever bothered to explain why she would make a great wife and mother? Since she likes to be a sperg about her dating profiles, I'm curious as to how she would desscribe herself as wifey material.
Even if she could find a guy that could look past her whore lifestyle, what decent man would look at a woman who can't cook, clean, or take care of herself and think "Yeah, that's the one for me! That's the one I want taking care of the house and raising my family!"?
Absolutely but I think her standards are also ridiculously high so the question is how much is she willing to settle and how quickly
Because of the nugget of truth in it, I've noticed a lot of people, especially online lunatics, have fully adopted the extreme feminist view that men want nothing but a pussy to fuck. But they twist it into "and that's a good thing."
Everything else about a woman isn't just ignored but it's supposed to be ignored, it's problematic to have preferences of any kind after all. Even admitting an attraction towards a certain type is frowned upon, why couldn't you just fuck whatever comes along like a "normal person"?
These people have a manichaean black-and-white worldview where existing preferences need to be eliminated and "rationally" reconstructed from a blank state. It's not just a "libertarian rationalist" thing, this is all over leftist spaces as well. The idea of a "natural" preference for an attractive partner who covers for your weaknesses is itself offensive, you should want a partner for themselves absent of any preference of what you want. Even though this is completely incoherent and not constructed "rationally" from anything in the first place, it's simply an inverting of traditional preferences that have good reason for existing.
It's also setting yourself up for failure and disappointment because you will never be able to meet the "rational" standard. You're combatting millions of years of evolution and at least thousands of years of social/cultural conditioning. You're framing yourself as better than all of human history. When you demand perfection you will fail and decide it must be impossible because it is but since everything is all-or-nothing the response can't be nuance. Racial/ethnic preferences are a good example, especially because they've changed dramatically in recent memory, you're not "wrong" or "evil" for having them because they're natural. Yes, I suppose it'd be great if you found all ethnicities attractive (though this would be unusual like having no food preferences) but condemning yourself for your sins won't solve it. We mock "one of the good ones" but that's an important step to acceptance, you can't compare that to the ideal, you need to compare it to rejecting them entirely. Once you accept there can be good ones you at least must consider that maybe they're a majority of the population and you're wrong about them. I somewhat changed tenses here but it applies just as much to who you find attractive as a potential mate. "I never thought I'd love someone like" is something so common to say nobody even notices it.
And if all else fails you can just knock her over the head and take her back to your cave, that's still good law for possession.