Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.9%

  • Total voters
    352
If this is actually the same dude, what awful opsec, no wonder he got caught with CP.
 
Totally not seething.
I think that filing will backfire on him and his lawyer in spectacular fashion and the way Nick is ranting on Xitter shows how unhinged he is right now.

Totally not reading this thread too.

View attachment 6311344View attachment 6311358View attachment 6311360
I have 6800+ posts. I’m nowhere near a major contributor to these forums but I’ve been way more of an important member witnessing lore drop than this pedo faggot ever was.

Fun fact: I only arrived here because of The Dick Show, I’m basically in the same generation of Kiwiposters as Balldo.

Edit: And yes Nick is part of the Kiwifarms community whether he likes it or not. You don’t have Null on for hours and hours of interviews and DM him messages without being part of KF.
 
Last edited:
What I don't understand is that this focus on the Qriist user seems like a PR red herring, no?
Because I can't see how this is a good argument against the video recording of the criminal procedure.
If for some God forsaken reason Nick wanted to put his children to testify in front of the court, this part of the trial wouldn't be recorded.
I think he is trying to achieve to things at the same time.

1) Discredit KF as the PedoFarms to own Null
2) Use this person as reason for a high emotion appeal to the court


I don't think they will get anywhere and I really hope the guy files an "in pauperis" defamation suits against Nick and his lawyer for the contents of that filing.
Just to fuck with Nick.
 
I mean it's not a good look to have a pedophile active on the forums.
Statistics suggest there are hundreds active on this forum, there's nothing we can do about it. Nulls sage advice is for people to keep their personal identity decoupled from this site entirely.
 
What I don't understand is that this focus on the Qriist user seems like a PR red herring, no?
Because I can't see how this is a good argument against the video recording of the criminal procedure.
If for some God forsaken reason Nick wanted to put his children to testify in front of the court, this part of the trial wouldn't be recorded.

Overall the motion seemed overdone and reasonably pointless. The omnibus hearing and all pre-jury seating parts of the process were not likely to be streamed anyway. Neither was any potential testimony by his children. The motion just seemed like a typical lolcow "own the farms by shooting off my own foot" moment.

He and his attorney should be working full-time on his defense or whatever he intends to do in court. But rather than do that, Nick has his attorney spending large amounts of time on nonsense while he struts around around Twitter. Not a good plan.
 
I mean it's not a good look to have a pedophile active on the forums.
I think it is also entirely irrelevant what he was convicted for previously.
If he had been doing illegal things here, then yes. But he did not lose his first amendment right to free speech and since it is a public forum he could in theory return with an anonymous account anyway. So what is the point?

Every group of people has criminals as part of it, it is unavoidable and could only be prevented by complete screening and background check on every user.
I bet that would go over well with the Constitutionalists in Nick's sphere when full identification is required to go on the internet.
 
Nick is so desperate for a single perceived win right now that he is manically posting on xitter after achieving the most minor of non-losses.
is that standard procedure for Lawyers? Is the judge watching him make these compelling arguments, or does he actually think that public opinion matters in the court of law (does it!?)? If he's innocent he should just keep his mouth shut and coast through this whole thing no sweat, right?
 
Either Nick's Barneswalking lawyer lied in his filing or he's just totally incompetent.

He states that a certain RekietaLaw Locals member was "upon information and belief, the first individual who sought information" from the County, but the email he cites is dated Tuesday, May 28, whereas there are many emails in the dump from before that, going back as early as Thursday, May 24 (the date of the arrest).
 
Public figures meaning politicians or celebrities, not cokehead streamers. And crimes of moral turpitude meaning something along the lines of the Ohio State University sex abuse scandal or kidnapping a child and torturing them to death. Not being a cokehead hoarder.

Obviously much of those guidelines are based entirely on opinion, but I believe a false rape accusation can easily ruin somebodies entire life and therefore the option for a private trial should be available to the majority of parties who ask.
Brvh, any crime you get convicted of that isn't speeding or jaywalking is considered a crime of moral turpitude.
 
Be careful when reading this one, there's so much hypocrisy here it might be lethal if you aren't adequately prepared.
View attachment 6311423
(tweet) (archive)
Completely fallen to Dick Masterson's level.
Hello nick, know you're reading. Vito is a pedophile and you slurp on his balls. And on diddler dax totem pole you're lower than Vito. Ooooof
 
Statistics suggest there are hundreds active on this forum, there's nothing we can do about it. Nulls sage advice is for people to keep their personal identity decoupled from this site entirely.
That fair but once the reveal is made, there should be zero tolerance and hopefully ban the account. Gotta purge those types or else it makes the fourm look bad. Not suggesting a nanny state but it's not a good look having him around.
 
Hi Nick.

I just want to tell you that no matter what happens with the myriad cases you've got yourself involved in, everyone knows you're a gay faggot that sucks dick for cock and that sweet Kayla is a coke whore who's fucked half of Jamaica

Now you might shrug this off as just kiwifag seething but remember bud, I don't have to take to Twitter to desperately try to own the gaylogs that are trolling me. I don't seethe in impotent rage at some stupid website. Here's to your day in court, hope it's a good one!

Yours truly, some retard.

P.S. Bet you still can't get your limp dick to work.
 
Back