Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 25.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 63 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 145 39.1%

  • Total voters
    371
Totally not seething.
I think that filing will backfire on him and his lawyer in spectacular fashion and the way Nick is ranting on Xitter shows how unhinged he is right now.

Totally not reading this thread too.

View attachment 6311344View attachment 6311358View attachment 6311360
It’s an anonymous web forum. It’s not like it requires a government ID and a background check.

This is just guilt by association and smears to try to make people paranoid so they lock it down.
 
I do not get the point, Tommy Tooter jerked off a dog and was allowed to have an account, is there some moral obligation to ban pedophiles?
Oh, Tommy did more than that...

He's a special case though because he had a thread, an entire subforum at some point, and was a POI. He was kept around for people to kick the shit out of it.

Tommy was a rare example of the milk coming to the Farms, and not the Farms having to go look for the milk.

Qriist having an account with an unchangeable badge of shame is one thing, but the fact that so many users interacted and gave positive reactions to the pedophile instead of flaming him out of every thread he ever posted in is the most concerning thing here.
Judging by the number of people asking who Jason Close is, I don't think a lot of people knew.
 
I'm sorry but exactly how many Kiwi Farms users were aware of Qriist's real identity and chose not to say anything this entire time?

Are we supposed to try and dox every single user just to make sure they aren't a pedophile before we give their post a positive reaction or reply to them? There is literally over 100K users.
 
Qriist having an account with an unchangeable badge of shame is one thing, but the fact that so many users interacted and gave positive reactions to the pedophile instead of flaming him out of every thread he ever posted in is the most concerning thing here.
This is straight up retarded, am I supposed to check with each post who the person behaved and it is and to then do a rating solely based on that?
 
So let me get this straight...

Nick openly and repeatedly lusted after an underage character in a movie...

Nick eventually gave a pass to Cuties...

Nick made a diaper fetish joke about an abused minor...

Nick is friends with Vito, a self-admitted pedophile...

Nick made constant "just a joke, bro" accusations about people at his church raping children...

Nick hangs out and is best friends with known a known groomer, Drexal

Nick looks up to creepy pedo-adjacent (if I'm being generous) people like Dick Masterson.

And Nick just happens to know and have the KiwiFarms info of a pedo who just did him a solid at throwing mud into the water, who also just so happens to hang out in his Locals.


Nick, if we're going to play the guilt-by-association game for KF and it's users... uh... what's that make you then?
 
Nick pretending not to read his thread is the funniest shit ever!

We know you read it nick.
IMG_1633.png"I don't. read. this thread. in fact. IMG_1648.png I haven't. 5741586-6005951d5faae19e97bcfef49f56e023.pngread. my. thread. in years.IMG_1647.png after it. stop. being useful.9AF11443-F11A-4E4C-BEAB-32579752AF38.png what's so. Rackets grin.png hard. to. understand.1717407163645.pngabout that???"
 
Yeah. I understand that Twitter & other social media apps have protections because the membership volume is too large to efficiency combat cp or pdfs. But as a site that still gets shit on for the eariler defending shotacon, we just gotta do better in weeding pedos out.
We name and shame not to win the optics war, but because it's the right thing to do. Stop being such a cuck.
 
I have a question, am I fucking blind or did Jason Close never request any body cam footage?
All I find in the document I have (which is the big gathered pdf file of public record requests) is him asking for the search warrant on the 28th.

He only mentions the bodycam footage on this forum as a possible option for Nick Rakieta to prove violation of constitutional rights and fight the search of his house or the warrant.

Did he actually request the bodycam footage or recordings of anything anywhere? If so, please let me know which document to look in.
 
He is constantly streaming in public himself about all the details of his case and making criminal accusations against people involved. Yet his attorney is concerned about tainting the jury pool if any of the court proceedings are made available.
He's desperate. This is desperation. I guess the smug fuck didn't get his plea deal.
And this filing is fucking Greer tier, you can tell any brains for the law or eloquence Nick used to have has been permanently ruined by drink and drugs.
His brain is fried. This is sloppy as hell even from a pro se retard like Greer or the Gobble Monster Acerthorne, from a "real lawyer" its fucking pathetic. He sounds like a histrionic old maid.

Worst thing is Nick has fried his brain so much he probably read this through before filing it and saw nothing wrong with it, but to someone who isn't a desperate child neglecting drunk its fucking weak shit. I always knew he was a hypocrite so it doesn't surprise me but I would have at least expected a "lawyer" to have a better grasp on how to file something than a mush mouthed whore monger who stalked Taylor Swift.
 
If I were someone who was speaking to the courts I would send clips of Nick saying he wants more transparency in court cases plus his comments about the previous judge, the public workers, etc.

If he's fine and dandy with talking shit about people involved in the case in public, as well as discussing the case publicly, he should be fine with it being filmed.
 
We name and shame not to win the optics war, but because it's the right thing to do. Stop being such a cuck.
Imagine thinking "maybe we shouldn't downplay having a pedo in the forum because nick will get a win is retarded" makes you a cuck? Dude touch grass. All I'm saying it makes you guys look worse if you having to scramble reasons to downplay, you can admit the farms fucked up, simple as that.
 
It's notable that this Jason Close guy is a kiwi farms user very visibly tagged as a pedophile since early this year. It'd be the lowest hanging fruit for Nick to reach for and impersonate, especially as the letter is written in a cunty tone very similar to Rackets' own. Crucify the guy by all means, he's a fucking pedo, but him being the guy to take the initiative to do this and directly play into Rackets' hand like this is a little too coincidentally beneficial to Nick.
I'm half convinced thats exactly what he did tbh
 
Back