Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 25.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 63 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 145 39.1%

  • Total voters
    371
I hope as many as possible can attend and try to write down as much as possible. Then afterwards collect all notes and compile them into a single document.
If kiwi#3 failed to write down some sentence said, then maybe kiwi#5 captured it. So we can then basically
do "erasure coding" but on humans taking notes, and recreate as much as possible of what was said and happened.

Everyone should also frequently write down the current time in their notes, to make it easier to cross-reference between the notes from the different kiwis in attendance and make recovering the missed sentences easier.

My suggestion:
1, just go there and write down as fast as you can as much as you can. every minute, write down the timestamp in your notes.
Dont worry about if you miss some sentence.

Afterwards
2, everyone just compare notes, use the timestamps to align it all and merge everything into a single document.
 
They don't remotely need the kids as witnesses, especially considering Nick has obviously coached them to lie, about the only thing he's qualified to teach anyone about. They have all the elements of the offense they need. Why would they call them? So they could declare them hostile witnesses and make them cry on the stand after they lied for their non-practicing babydaddy?
But why would Nick be so happy about the prosecution filing?
He Xeeted more than one time that both filings were important. What was so important in the prosecution one? The only relevant thing I can think of is the fact that the children aren't considered to be called by the prosecution...
The language is used because in the case of child neglect, the victim (per legal definition in this specific context) is the State of Minnesota.
At this point, what they are charged with currently is endangerment/neglect (basically, knowingly having your kids present where someone is possessing) which follows trivially from the possession charge since the drugs were found in the family home. Everyone agrees some of his kids were present. No testimony from the kids is likely to be relevant, much less required.

It was a possibility that in advance of the omnibus hearing, Nick and/or Kayla would be slapped with new, additional charges in relation to the 8yo testing positive for coke.

My Rekieta word salad translation to pure English is that Nick took the sentence in question to mean that they are no longer at risk of being charged with dosing their 8 year old with coke, because in that circumstance, the testimony in question would no longer be unlikely.

This is not a fear that would need to be dispelled for most people such that it's a "good day" to read a document that could possibly be parsed that way, and it does not AT ALL mean the test result was wrong, but whatever.

He usually only streams these days when he feels like he's gotten a W, so decent chance of a stream tonight.
 
1. Rekieta is a liar.
The State filed a statement that it is 'unlikely' that minors will be testifying in this case. This is a killshot to his muh keedz argument. He's just using them as a human shield to avoid any accountability.
Potential counterpoint from Lord Balldo:
Screenshot 2024-08-16 200450.png
He just forgot that the state isn't treating his children as victims. Stop being autistic, Jersh. You and your gaggle of pedophiles aren't good judges of people. Lord Balldo never lies or implies
 
Fight nick! Fight the government! How dare they plant an Oz of coke in your master bedroom!
Nah Nick knows he's guilty, you've gotta goad him with promises of boosting his ego, like this...

"Oh boy Josh and the Kiwifarms would be so felted if Nick beat the charges, oh boy I really hope he doesn't fight them, if he won we'd all look like idiots, and he'd seem so cool."
 
Is there not some sort of professional court-note-taker-person that Null/The Farms can directly pay money to go witness the trial and take good notes and not fuck it up? It'd be worth every dollar.

Also, if some psycho shows up in pjs acting retarded, it would be very clear that wasn't Kiwifarms' doing, if Null hired a very legit person to take it seriously and professionally.
 
Fan fiction prediction: Kayla pleads out and Nick throws her under the bus - he initiates a divorce and pins 100% of it on Kayla.

Kayla would have to be super buck broken for this to work though. I'm 50/50 on if this would make her grow a spine.
I am sure this is very close to what Null insinuated on the stream with Potentially Criminal. Nick is a narcissist. It would be fitting for him to do this.
 
I hope as many as possible can attend and try to write down as much as possible. Then afterwards collect all notes and compile them into a single document.
If kiwi#3 failed to write down some sentence said, then maybe kiwi#5 captured it. So we can then basically
do "erasure coding" but on humans taking notes, and recreate as much as possible of what was said and happened.

Everyone should also frequently write down the current time in their notes, to make it easier to cross-reference between the notes from the different kiwis in attendance and make recovering the missed sentences easier.

My suggestion:
1, just go there and write down as fast as you can as much as you can. every minute, write down the timestamp in your notes.
Dont worry about if you miss some sentence.

Afterwards
2, everyone just compare notes, use the timestamps to align it all and merge everything into a single document.
I'm livid that this comes mere weeks after I would have been able to drive a short way and attend in person. Not only would I take notes of what is said but I would have payed close attention to tone and physicality. Some real Doctor Grande tier shit.
 
Is there not some sort of professional court-note-taker-person that Null/The Farms can directly pay money to go witness the trial and take good notes and not fuck it up? It'd be worth every dollar.

Also, if some psycho shows up in pjs acting retarded, it would be very clear that wasn't Kiwifarms' doing, if Null hired a very legit person to take it seriously and professionally.
Yeah, it’s called a court reporter. Funny enough one will already be there. However, transcripts take time.
 
wearing a suit and tie is overkill, you aren't working at the court house. you are attending in the gallery. any business casual/informal outfit will be fine.


attending the gallery of a court, particularly in a rural area in summer, in a suit stands out more than just normal fucking clothes like a pair of khakis and a button down shirt.
Normally, yes, but if you're somewhere your mere presence will cause a spergout it's better not to stand out as an outsider.
Yes. As a matter of fact they can hold you for contempt if you dress like an ss13 clown.
Out west/south western wear can be worn in court. Hence Kurt's retarded cowboy hat.
And it's fairly common, especially in Texas, for even lawyers to wear things like bolo ties and cowboy boots. Old school celebrity lawyer Gerry Spence made it part of his look. In the North some judges can be very prickly about decorum and summarily eject people from their courtroom for not being up to snuff. One judge in Milwaukee involved in some Pat Tomlinson case had a news story about him dressing down a lawyer for wearing an ascot.
The no phones thing is pretty common. Last time I had jury duty I kept forgetting and had to go toss it in my car.
One court I went to fairly often was nice enough to have a locker where they'd check it in and give you a ticket. Even cops would be expected to check in their guns and electronics, though.
 
Last edited:
Back