Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 127 37.4%

  • Total voters
    340
For fuck sake. Just wear clean clothes without fucking holes in them.

Jeans and a polo, or a nice shirt, is more than proper for spectating in court
But I already borrowed this getup from @Nicholas II of Russia , are you telling me what's good for the imperial court isn't good for the kandinosi court?
1723864182985.png
 
I wonder if Ethan Ralph will lose another Purse if he goes to harass people in Minnesota
Ethan Ralph wouldn't even be let into Minnesota, besides he's really scared of Metokur who is 99% already confirmed to be attending the hearing under a disguise.
Ethan Ralph won't dare show his face in person there cause he's a coward.
 
Ethan Ralph wouldn't even be let into Minnesota, besides he's really scared of Metokur who is 99% already confirmed to be attending the hearing under a disguise.
Ethan Ralph won't dare show his face in person there cause he's a coward.
If metokur is there hook me up cus I'd really like to say hi
 
Nick is still *technically* correct. The State said that THEY will not be calling on the children to testify. So obviously this means that Nick and Kayla will be calling on their kids to testify in their defense.
Genius maneuver. Give the kids a couple of red bulls and have them rail a couple of lines just before they testify and nobody will be able to out-talk or make sense of a sugared up and coked up preteen or child. It is the perfect Chewbacca defence.
 
Valued kiwi-documenters that will attend and take notes.
You are doing gods work.

Remember though that you only get one shot. Once the hearing is over, that's it. You can't go back and "I wish I would have made a note of that".
Write everything you can, no matter how trivial the details. Did Nick get upset? Did he flinch? did he respond in a sarcastic tone. Wat was his posture? Weird hand movements, stutter. What was the tone? happy, angry, nervous, irritated ?
Did he hesitate?
Write everything no matter how trivial. You only get one shot at this.
Did he interrupt his own lawyer? the judge? ...

If your pen rests for 3 seconds you have failed. The pen must be in motion from the second the hearing starts until it ends.
Document everything you can.

Let you never ask yourself later "was there something I should have written down that I didn't"
 
No doubt the guardian ad litum will be questioned, but I would have to believe the GAL or the children’s attorney would intervene if they didn’t want to take the stand. Nick would probably say he isn’t pressuring the kids, but being the narcissist he is, I’m sure he’s been coaching the whole family. No one wants to disappoint their dad unless they already hate him.
 
If your pen rests for 3 seconds you have failed. The pen must be in motion from the second the hearing starts until it ends.
Document everything you can.
And this is also a good reason to show up early. Practice by taking notes on the first hearing. That way you won't stand out. Do not sit right next to the defendant. If the seating area available has another party, sit near to them, not enough to be creepy. DO NOT LEAVE THE MOMENT NICK'S HEARING ENDS. That's more or less confirming to this cokehead why you're there. The one thing cokeheads are good at is paranoia.
Remember though that you only get one shot. Once the hearing is over, that's it. You can't go back and "I wish I would have made a note of that".
There will also be dead periods to the point you can go back and rewrite your recollection of things you forgot. Spend those minutes well.

Nick is reading this thread, so he'll probably immediately suspect anyone taking notes is it's about him. He can't catch everyone though. And if you're on the sex offender registry please just don't show up at all.
 
I am taking notes on previous trials as practice, WHAT am I actually going to fuck up so I don't do that a year from now
Remember to look and listen. Is the witness hesitantly answering? Who glances at who and so forth. Remember, a transcript is public, so if you can latch your note to a particular question you don't have to get every word. Accuracy, not precision.
 
What if this is what makes Balldo relent? A chance to facedox an up to date picture of Jim to own the Farms? Sure it'd come at the cost of airing all his dirty laundry and visual evidence of your strung out ourwife and temporary cum catcher "nanny" submitted for posterity to the internet visual archive of shit bags but hey! At this point any wins a win after the avalanche of L's you've given us to cement your position as Lolcow of the Decade the past few months.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
How many bozos you think might assume "court attire" means showing up dressed like a dandy fop with a fedora?
Probably a lot actually considering some of the posts that have showed up like just wear jeans and a polo like Chris-Chan would.
But I already borrowed this getup from @Nicholas II of Russia , are you telling me what's good for the imperial court isn't good for the kandinosi court?
View attachment 6315920
Top hats only!

(And fezzes.)

Here is some proper inspiration:

1723865589848.png

He won his case like this. So can you!
 
Remember to look and listen. Is the witness hesitantly answering? Who glances at who and so forth. Remember, a transcript is public, so if you can latch your note to a particular question, you don't have to get every word. Accuracy, not precision.
Court reporters and transcriptionists just literally type every word they hear into the record. They do not include stage directions or their own personal interpretations.

That is part of why appeals courts, who generally only see the transcripts from the trial courts, defer to the factual findings of the trier of fact, whether that is the judge in a bench trial or the jury in a jury trial. The actual fact-finder got to look at the demeanor of the witnesses, how they answered the questions, and what it said about their credibility.
He won his case like this. So can you!
Do not expect success in a suit like that unless you are an undisputed genius like Vinny Gambini.
 
Back