Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.8%

  • Total voters
    353
1. Rekieta is a liar.
The State filed a statement that it is 'unlikely' that minors will be testifying in this case. This is a killshot to his muh keedz argument. He's just using them as a human shield to avoid any accountability.
I can't believe that the zoosadistic, sociopathic lying liar who lies would lie about his kids being there. I just don't believe it, won't anybody think of the children???

Well, he will because he will bring them in. Even after all of the dirty dang trolls show up to watch the trial, because it hasn't been about the kids since he put on the Balldo and stuffed a bottle in his asshole. Don't worry though, he'll cook up some bullshit excuse as to why the kids HAD to be there despite the Karen Farms' operatives being on site that all of the weirdoes and wine aunts in the lowcalws qult will lap up immediately.
 
Btw, on MATI Aug 16 Null has confirmed a lawyer is going to attend and take notes or try and film with permis soon. So no farmers even need to go and are free to stim at home.

The more people who attend and provide evidence of the proceedings, the more evidence there is to support how the proceedings ACTUALLY went down. That way when Nick wants to lie and muckrake about his behavior in court, he’ll have 5-6 accounts truthfully refuting his bullshit and they’ll all be on the same page. It’s a lot easier to dispute his lies than if there were just 1 account.
 
How hard is it to understand "DO NOT FUCKING RECORD!"

I'd remind you Tommy Robinson nearly fucked over a trial and let a bunch of grooming pakis walk by doing that, irrespective of the slamming he got himself.
If it were that easy to get a case thrown out, why doesn't everyone do it? Just hire a Ralph-tier moron to go bust out the camera and go a hawlerin' and let him add another misdemeanor/felony to his record while you walk free. Though I'm sure Nick thinks he can get his case dismissed if a Jason Close hides a camera under his official Kiwifarms fedora.
 
Last edited:
If it were that easy to get a case thrown out, why doesn't everyone do it? Just hire a Ralph-tier moron to go bust out the camera and go a hawerlin' and let him add another misdemeanor/felony to his record while you walk free. Though I'm sure Nick thinks he can get his case dismissed if a Jason Close hides a camera under his official Kiwifarms fedora.
It isn't, thankfully. Well, technically the judge can do whatever he wants, but this would be retarded. The reason Robinson nearly fucked the trial is that bong courts think he's literally Hitler and they also tend to look for any excuse to let sand nigger rapists go free because muh doivuhsity.
 
It's not about getting the case thrown out. Nick wants stupid people to fuck with the court so they'll get angry and make it a private hearing with no cameras and stuff.
Please use accurate terminology.

The "hearing" is already without cameras or audio recording.

The TRIAL has not been set, might never happen, but the judge implied by using the wording of "premature" for the request that it would be considered there.
Pre trial hearings are, by court rule and Minnesota Supreme Court Order of 2024, not to be video or audio recorded.
 
If the intrepid Volunteer Kiwi Press Corps would like a recommendation for a place to debrief and host the after-party, here's my recommendation.
1000023039.jpg
 
Please use accurate terminology.

The "hearing" is already without cameras or audio recording.

The TRIAL has not been set, might never happen, but the judge implied by using the wording of "premature" for the request that it would be considered there.
Pre trial hearings are, by court rule and Minnesota Supreme Court Order of 2024, not to be video or audio recorded.
Whatever, bro. I'm not a lawyer and don't know/care about the right words. The people reading the thread understand the context well enough to know what I mean.
 
It isn't, thankfully. Well, technically the judge can do whatever he wants, but this would be retarded. The reason Robinson nearly fucked the trial is that bong courts think he's literally Hitler and they also tend to look for any excuse to let sand nigger rapists go free because muh doivuhsity.
The bong courts also cheated and deliberately waited until his real lawyer was out of the country so they could forcibly appoint him a fake lawyer whose job was to frame him. (A lawyer who did this in the U.S. would be disbarred and possibly criminally prosecuted.)
 
I understand I'm retarded, but can Kayla even take a plea deal in a way that prevents Nick from also either needing to plea or go to trial?

Like if Kayla goes 'your honor I'm guilty that's my crack' surely the judge will then turn to Nick and go 'if you were aware your wife had crack you are also guilty still?'

It's not like only one of them possessed it or endangered kids, if Nick was aware coke was IN HIS BEDROOM SAFE then he's still guilty of possessing cocaine.

And if Kayla was neglecting the kids but Nick didn't do shit to fix it, HE still neglected the fucking kids.

Am I missing something where there's a way to throw Kayla under the bus and get Nick off besides 'well the court won't want to put both parents on probation at the same time?'
 
Does anyone know where I can find the full version of that Rekieta song that Null played here?

I've put it up on YouTube. Lyrics in the description.


Will see about getting it on spotify and other places. People enjoyed it more than I expected so currently trying to make it accessible as possible. Attached it here as well for ease of access for you.

I will state that anyone is welcome to use it in any of their own content.

 
I understand I'm retarded, but can Kayla even take a plea deal in a way that prevents Nick from also either needing to plea or go to trial?

Like if Kayla goes 'your honor I'm guilty that's my crack' surely the judge will then turn to Nick and go 'if you were aware your wife had crack you are also guilty still?'

It's not like only one of them possessed it or endangered kids, if Nick was aware coke was IN HIS BEDROOM SAFE then he's still guilty of possessing cocaine.
They both possessed it. If Kayla is guilty so is Nick.

They both had a duty not to endanger children. If neither of them did that, they're both guilty.

It's pretty cut and dry.
Am I missing something where there's a way to throw Kayla under the bus and get Nick off besides 'well the court won't want to put both parents on probation at the same time?'
If this is Nick's plan it's a pipe dream. And the pipe is a crack pipe.
 
Not to seem like I'm encouraging crime, but if some awful person did manage to record the trial and it ended up here, what are the consequences? Especially if it's something like a hidden body cam that only captures the audio, so you couldn't identify the recorder.
Most likely:
1. Null's future interactions with the court in this case being impeded.
2. Said awful person being doxed, shamed, mocked and ratted out to the legal system.
 
I understand I'm retarded, but can Kayla even take a plea deal in a way that prevents Nick from also either needing to plea or go to trial?

Like if Kayla goes 'your honor I'm guilty that's my crack' surely the judge will then turn to Nick and go 'if you were aware your wife had crack you are also guilty still?'

It's not like only one of them possessed it or endangered kids, if Nick was aware coke was IN HIS BEDROOM SAFE then he's still guilty of possessing cocaine.

And if Kayla was neglecting the kids but Nick didn't do shit to fix it, HE still neglected the fucking kids.

Am I missing something where there's a way to throw Kayla under the bus and get Nick off besides 'well the court won't want to put both parents on probation at the same time?'
Kayla is not represented by a lawyer.

If the judge isn't retarded it should be immediately apparent what Nick is trying here and order her to be represented by a public defender to advise her.

The cases should be separated if Nick tries the "Kayla takes the fall" plan.
 
Back