Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 84 27.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 107 34.9%

  • Total voters
    307
The best part, in all honesty, is the only thing Nick had to do to prevent broadcasting of his omnibus was submit a single page letter stating Minnisota statute. Literally, that's all. Instead he probably he spent at least 5 thousand dollars in billable hours getting his Barneswalking lawyer digging up anything he possible could and drafting up a 15 page motion to deny.
I think, for him, he feels it was worth it because it allowed him to fling shit at the Farms in a legal filing. Then have a stream with Dick Masterson crowing about how brilliant he is.

You are correct that he only needed like one paragraph, citing the reason the judge actually adopted in the denial, but he wanted to try and twist the knife with the insinuation he made.
 
Last edited:
If Kayla agrees to plead guilty and testify it was her cocaine out of a misplaced sense of loyalty.
My recollection is that, along with the cokestream, Nick's speeding tickets are included in discovery. This means he's circumstantially on the record entering the coke into his house, via Rustang, and into his nose, via snort tube. In this light I don't see the "our wife's coke" strategy working at all, particularly after how angry trying it will make the prosecutor and the the judge.
 
You speak as if Nick didn’t write that Greer-tier motion response himself. So silly.
I highly doubt his lawyer would risk his license to practice law by endorsing a letter he did not pen.
I think, for him, he feels it was worth it because it allowed him to fling shit at the Farms in a legal filing. Then have a stream with Dick Masterson crowing about how brilliant he is.

You are correct that he only needed like one paragraph, citing the reason the judge actually adopted in the denial, but he wanted to try and twist the knife with the insinuation he made.
What's funny is that Nick actually thought a Dick Masterson stream was a win. The only people who want to stream with him are either more degenerate than he is and/or they simply want to grift off the series of poor life choices he's made over the past two years.
 
You speak as if Nick didn’t write that Greer-tier motion response himself. So silly.
I suppose it's possible, but Sean had a good point he raised on his stream that if it's over the signature of his actual lawyer, that's extremely risky for the lawyer. Enough so that most lawyers wouldn't permit it. Collaborate on your pleadings with your client? Sure. Have them write the entire thing? No.
 
A lot of Nick's ego is riding on winning these cases specifically to prove the farms wrong, however for all of this we've been largely nothing but spectators. It was his own feelings of inadequacy and unfulfilment that drove him to alcoholism, hard drugs and swinging. It was his sense of invincibility that lead him to commit defamation against Montograph. It was his own church congregation and sister-in-law that that tipped off the cops and it was all of those things that lead up to his pillstream and subsequent arrest. Yet it really seems like his biggest concern in winning all of this asides from walking away a free man with no limits on his hedonism, is proving us wrong, but the problem even if he did it wouldn't fix anything for him.

Even if all of the charges were dropped, the hair test was proven to be erroneous and he was allowed to go free and all of this caused Montograph to drop dead of a stroke, it wouldn't make him any less of a alcoholic coke-fiend cuckold, and wouldn't prevent him from continuing to destroy what's left of his life which will attract people here to gawk at his downfall.
 
I watched a recap of nicks cope stream explaining the hair tests.

The cope is amazing! They're saying that the test used is higher if they test black people Vs white so the test is unreliable.

nick_blackface2.jpg

Nick your daughter is white even if you are a fucking nigger coke head degenerate
 
Last edited:
My recollection is that, along with the cokestream, Nick's speeding tickets are included in discovery.
If the cokestream is admitted into evidence, and Nick takes this to trial, it's gonna be tough to win under even the most favorable circumstances with his patented "drunk + narcolepsy" defense.
 
You speak as if Nick didn’t write that Greer-tier motion response himself. So silly.
The dead give-a-way was the page on the lawyer number. He's clearly listed in Minn database. Nick called out a scribeners error as if there wasn't attorney in Minnesota with that name and implied a fraud was being committed on the court.

The court could and should have sanctioned him monetarily for that frivolity. Diligence required him to search the name, not just the number, if he's calling out that kind of malfeasance.
 
I highly doubt his lawyer would risk his license to practice law by endorsing a letter he did not pen.
I suppose it's possible, but Sean had a good point he raised on his stream that if it's over the signature of his actual lawyer, that's extremely risky for the lawyer. Enough so that most lawyers wouldn't permit it. Collaborate on your pleadings with your client? Sure. Have them write the entire thing? No.
This would be correct under the assumption that Francis White III is a smart and reasonable person. Unfortunately, he is a Barneswalker.
 
You speak as if Nick didn’t write that Greer-tier motion response himself. So silly.
Nick's Barneswalking lawyer appears to be a bigger Twitter addict than Nick is, I have no doubt he was fully involved in writing and contributing the pithy remarks in the basically pointless filing.
 
So 90's and early 00's AIM text speak experts are what is required?
...I don't know what that is*...just some note-taking stuff relevant in part at least to common law-related phrases. Are you being mean? :biggrin:

* aim as in AOL? I don't know/never used it :cringe:
Oh my God, I’ve read so much advice on how I should dress that I thought I was on the Beauty Parlor board.
Fashion advice is the great uniter.

I highly doubt his lawyer would risk his license to practice law by endorsing a letter he did not pen.
If you think every lawyer personally writes every word of something they file....

In a firm (for example), partners have associates draft things, then review, revise, approve, whatever. And a lawyer with a lawyer for a client may do the same thing. Saves a client money (usually), but of course the filing attorney is accountable for the contents/filing.
 
Back