Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 87 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.3%

  • Total voters
    320
Ok, which one of you faggots did this?!

IMG_7912.jpeg
 
Ok, which one of you faggots did this?!

View attachment 6319405
Oh, that's actually happened a lot. Check the edit history. It's funny.

The old edits, around the time of Weeb Wars, have him as "Lord Inquisitor" and "Chief Tard Wrangler."

Then as you move forward in time it starts shitting all over him.
 
After going through all of the "attending court" advice you guys have given over the past 500 pages, I saw someone mention not attending if you're a sex offender/pedophile. I suggest completely ignoring that advice. Just show up, be the most belligerent asshole you can be until security adds new .45 shaped holes into you.

Also, if one of you fucks gets into a fist fight with Ralph in the parking lot, I fully expect at least 3 more of you to record that shit and have it on my desk within an hour. No excuses.
 
As far as spy pens and shit like that goes. It gives cops a major boner to write people chinsie felonies for stuff like recording government proceedings. They literally have example boards of go-by examples so they can arrest people by saying "in my training and experience as a law enforcement officer I am arresting you to see if that is a recording device because it looks like it probably is one."
 
What that case said is that what matters for constructive possession is dominion and control over the drugs rather than dominion & control over just the place where the drugs were discovered. I don't see how that case helps Nick in any way.
I wasn’t implying it would help him in any way whatsoever. Just pointing out the futility of his delusions. Even with the most restrictive parameters regarding his criminal offense he is still guilty. He can’t blame Aaron, April or Kayla for his ounce of cocaine since it was in his safe which the police had to crack (not that kind Nick, settle down). No amount of weasel words will exonerate Coke-Queen Cuck Balldo. Here is the original post regarding Constructive Possession:
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently narrowed the definition of constructive possession. Storing cocaine in his personal safe in his bedroom is indefensible in my opinion, there is no way he can argue it wasn’t his.

State v. Florine Supreme Court of Minnesota Feb 7, 1975

State v. Hunter Court of Appeals of Minnesota. Dec 22, 2014

View attachment 6317796
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
The evidence doesn't get presented at the omnibus hearing. It's just confirmed that it's all been given to the defence.
Well, if Crackets contests the admissibility of a certain test result then we're going to get arguments about it. This is where I'm going to be paying the most attention. Much, much more qualified (and expensive) scientific experts can't knock mass spec results out. It happens through shoddy handling or contamination, not the testing protocol. So I'm looking forward to the amusement from watching Crackets annoy a judge through his pretensious idiocy.
 
While court attendance and attire are being debated, I was hoping this could be highlighted. Namely, Null has a dark theory about Nick's intentions, "it's one of the most despicable things that a man can ever possibly fucking do."
It's in the second clip here. Null later tells Kayla to get the fuck out.

That's rather ominous. I see others are there but I think it's worth punctuating.
If she has brain ? Yes she should get her own Attorney ASAP but Crackets has her locked down and most likely feeding her bullshit that she doesn't get a lawyer or get one his lawyer friends instead in MN.
Considering Kayla is supposedly pro se, and received a plea deal, I wouldn't be shocked if Nick's grand plan is to have Kayla take the fall, and say "It was all me, Nick had no idea, he was in the car while I was using the cocaine" so Nicky and April Amhole can stay out of trouble, and continue their coke fuelled sexcapades.
Throwing Kayla under the buss and then trying to put her in prison/ looney bin to get rid of her and prevent her from divorce raping him and probably putting up his parents to it.
Since we know Kayla is likely taking a plea deal, I bet Null’s legal theory is Rekieta will try to throw his used-up, body-ruined wife under the buss and claim the coke was all hers. He won’t care what happens because he’s already upgraded to April.
Sure there is.

If Kayla agrees to plead guilty and testify it was her cocaine out of a misplaced sense of loyalty.

Or if Nick threatens to leave Kayla for April unless Kayla says it was hers.
Kayla has no rep so he can pin it all on her, get full custody and an no-fault divorce, get full physical custody so Kayla isn't entitled to any money, then put up a feel-good prosecutorial misconduct fight while Kayla is on probation in the cuck shed while he, the kids, and April live in the big house. Mom will spend the daylight hours on the main property under Nick's supervision and will be told she did the right thing for her family and mothers have to sacrifice blah blah blah. Nick will get a misdemeanor child endangerment while Kayla gets the felony.
To flesh out what may be Null's prediction:

Kayla is expected to enter a guilty plea. She is currently without legal representation, Nick and April have probably indicated to her that they too will plead guilty. Kayla will proceed with her plea, but there is a strong possibility that Nick and April may later retract their commitment to do the same. Even if they do follow through with their pleas, Nick is likely prepared to present evidence concerning Kayla's prescription and illegal drug use, which the State may already be aware of. Her plea will likely include a confession of her sole ownership of the cocaine.

Nick will have prepared documented substantial evidence of Kayla’s drug-related behavior, legal and illegal. In Minnesota, which is a one-party consent state, he could have recordings of their conversations or those with her family and possibly his own children regarding her mental state and drug use. Even worse, this evidence could potentially lead to the possibility of involuntary commitment.

Then, given Kayla's status as a convicted felon with documented drug issues, Nick will argue that he is the more suitable parent and seek custody of their children. He was the parent driving the kids to activities. In such a scenario, Kayla could lose custody, and Nick, April, and the children may relocate, potentially to a different state such as Florida or Texas. (Despite being on probation, relocation is feasible by filing a motion with the court.)

I apologize for the wall of words, however, I believe this may be Null's prediction and worth highlighting.
 
I have recruited a friend. We will be there, taking notes. Ezpect updates late Wednesday/early Thursday. Neither of us are supremely quick writers, but we will do our best. A third may join us. If the third comes he will be on ralphamale transcription duty.
Please DM Null, he's trying to organize all of the kiwis that are going so they can all work together.
 
If Nick snakes her like this, there is no corner of the internet he could flee to without being doggedly alogged.
Maybe, but his remaining audience is also retarded, so they'd probably buy the theory it's all her fault hook, line, and sinker. Anything to justify believing their e-daddy is not a bad man.

I dunno why the state would buy any of it though. Dude was visibly on coke on that May 20th stream. It would seem like that would a bitch move on their part as much as Nick's.
 
If Nick snakes her like this, there is no corner of the internet he could flee to without being doggedly alogged.
Nicky doesn't need the Internet to survive, he's perfectly able to live out his miserable life with mommy and daddy paying for everything. They're already trying to cover his ass legally, they'll definitely allow him to be a waste of space for the rest of their lives
 
This theory would also line up with what Aaron said of April - that she absolutely wanted to take Kayla’s place.

If Kayla has any sense she’ll have already worked something out with the prosecutor, but she may have sealed her fate if she took that deal.
“One of us had to take the charge, but I had NO IDEA my lawyer would do this! I only signed the committal papers to put you in rehab so it would look better to the court and they wouldn’t put you in jail for years… But don’t worry Kayla! In a week or two April and I will come and pick you right up at rehab! Just a week honey!”

Nick when Kayla is put under his guardianship, probably.
 
Back