Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

You're Indian so I understand why your women aren't trusting men's intentions like other men would be.
I don't know where the racial aspect comes from. Yes Indian men love to rape but it's a result of untermensch values and lack of self awareness. There are white people who rape children and black people who rape white women, the per capita of all three are almost the same except there are more Indians because the population is 1.5 billion, I don't see anybody who says niggers love to rape women or crackers love pedophilia even though those are obvious logical conclusions as well. It's just a wrong conclusion from shit information. I feel like I've proved that I'm educated and self aware enough to not rape people or act like a nigger, yes there's the one out of context instance where I got angry at a woman for kicking me when I'm down but by that standard of textual literalism everybody in this thread loves to rape women as well . So please, cut me some slack and stop infighting, I'm not an enemy I'm just an observer with few insights.
 
I don't know where the racial aspect comes from. Yes Indian men love to rape but it's a result of untermensch values and lack of self awareness. There are white people who rape children and black people who rape white women, the per capita of all three are almost the same except there are more Indians because the population is 1.5 billion, I don't see anybody who says niggers love to rape women or crackers love pedophilia even though those are obvious logical conclusions as well. It's just a wrong conclusion from shit information. I feel like I've proved that I'm educated and self aware enough to not rape people or act like a nigger, yes there's the one out of context instance where I got angry at a woman for kicking me when I'm down but by that standard of textual literalism everybody in this thread loves to rape women as well . So please, cut me some slack and stop infighting, I'm not an enemy I'm just an observer with few insights.
Indians are brown, ugly, and smell bad; making fun of them is morally correct.
 
Ehrm guys, there are just as many females geniuses as male geniuses! Because, because, women can also have autism, which is obviously a prerequisite, and just because they don't exhibit any symptoms, or posses any remarkable skills, doesn't mean they're not geniuses/autistics. Guys, its muh soggy knees keeping women down today, secretly theres toooooooooooooooooons of female geniuses, they just don't want to reveal their power level ok, and anyways they can't, cause oppression and such, ok. Ok!?!?!
they usually try to use the bellcurve iq idea to ignore this, but that study was done eons ago in terms of scientific research
we will likely never get an honest study on intelligence between different groups of people ever again thanks to modern equality cancer

but the urge to laugh when you hear women are as smart as men should be all the evidence you really need on what is true
the fact something unwarranted needs to be said in the first place is a sign it's probably false
no different than "i'm not like other girls"
 
but the urge to laugh when you hear women are as smart as men should be all the evidence you really need on what is true
the fact something unwarranted needs to be said in the first place is a sign it's probably false
I'm willing to believe women possess better emotional intelligence than men on average. Which is why they dominate the HR industry, all the wheeling and dealing manipulative pr media bullshit they're queens of. Cognitive abilities maybe not so much on average. Visual and spatial I think there is a study I forgot which one which proves that women are certainly inferior to men in the visual and spatial intelligence category on average.
 
emotional intelligence
don't use their cope terms
there is only one form of measurable intelligence: the ability to learn and understand things in general
this is just social skills labeled as intellect in an effort to make midwits feel better about their failings
Visual and spatial I think there is a study I forgot which one which proves that women are certainly inferior to men in the visual and spatial intelligence category on average.
And this is why you should dismiss it entirely
1665752570148169.jpg
in what universe, can you fuck this up?
everyone in their life has drank from a bottle before and should know exactly how this should look like
 
don't use their cope terms
there is only one form of measurable intelligence: the ability to learn and understand things in general
this is just social skills labeled as intellect in an effort to make midwits feel better about their failings
Social skills do not include methods of manipulation and rhetorical skills. Those are intrinsic traits, what can be summarised as smartness. Intelligence is more a result of processing information and coming to conclusions. Smartness is about knowing how to resolve situations and manipulate people under any circumstance, it's not something which can be extrinsically learned with any amount of effort, I'm proof of that.
in what universe, can you fuck this up?
everyone in their life has drank from a bottle before and should know exactly how this should look like
This is not just visuospatial question but a physics question as well in part. I know it's easy off the cuff but it's not completely unbiased, so not a fair estimate. A better visuospatial question set would be figure orientation questions (rotate the figure x times what's the outcome, if x actions are made to a square what would be the resulting figure, what would be the midpoint of x dots oriented on a 64 dot grid).
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: God of Nothing
What exactly is unbiased about understanding that liquids are always level?
It's a physics based question, it's similar to how water pressure increases with increase in depth from surface. You need to at least have some prior interaction with the stimulus and knowledge about it, in this case water. It may be a part of general knowledge but it's not completely unbiased. Similar to math questions, they're not fair evaluation because they don't evaluate pure information processing, they evaluate information processing through the lens of math. Logic questions come close to measuring pure information processing which is something like general intelligence, visuospatial processing and logical analysis. The water level problem is evaluating general knowledge/common sense, not iq.

Edit: I forgot to mention this, the tower of Hanoi is a good start at understanding general intelligence tests. It evaluates logical processing and problem solving skills, most commonly provided to toddlers and famously featured in rise of the planet of the apes as being the test for chimp intelligence.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: JoseRaulChupacabra
Back