US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:

The Most Dangerous Question Of 2024 - What If Kamala Harris Isn't An Idiot?​


On the eve of the Democratic National Convention, after a coup against their former standard-bearer Joe Biden, we face a very disturbing question.

What if Kamala Harris isn’t the idiot the media has made her out to be?

Harris was clearly chosen for this role. She’s been groomed for it for nearly two decades. She isn’t the best of a list of bad choices. The Democrats drove the good choices from the party and blocked others becoming a part of it.

There were no Democratic primaries, folks.

She was placed as Biden’s Vice-President to have the inside track on this gig when they decided Joe finally had to be dragged from the stage.

The coup was penciled in on the Gantt Chart at Evil Corp. Central for the weekend of July 13th.

In 2020, Harris voters roundly rejected her for President, getting zero delegates before being roasted by Tulsi Gabbard.

She dropped out despite being the darling of the media and the donor class. Going into those primaries, she was the establishment’s pick.

Once she failed they moved to Plan B: rig the game for Biden.

They said, “We’ll install a mushroom so corrupt we can make him do whatever we want Joe just wants his money and his ice cream.”

So you force Harris onto Joe. Or the other way around… never mind she’s too old for him.

Meanwhile Harris waited. She let Joe take the heat. She said little, did less and then is installed, tabula rasa, into a campaign just days after a failed assassination attempt on Donald Trump to steal even that thunder.

We were never allowed to discuss her culpability, along with the cabinet, as to how Biden could have been running the country for the past three years without them invoking the 25th amendment out of pity for the man if nothing else.

Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot Democrats don’t have emotions other than hate and envy.

She was installed as the candidate to front-run an insurgency at this week’s convention by Hillary Clinton and her merry band of Neocons. Don’t expect them to take this sitting down, there are likely to be some sparks this week in Chicago, even if they don’t turn into a bonfire.

So, that leads me to ask my question, not because I think Harris is some latent IQ160 or anything. I asked my question because this is a woman who faced zero real voters and is one vote-rigging operation away from the presidency.

So, maybe she’s a genius when measuring her political intelligence.

What if we’ve all been led down the primrose path of stooping to Trump’s level coming up with cute memes about her vast collection of knee pads or her inappropriate laughter at tragedy?

What if that is exactly the means to lull us all into thinking there’s no way anyone will vote for this woman?

And if this was any normal (a nebulous term these days at best) election, I would agree with you. But, for 90% of the fifty elections the US is going to hold for its president, who you vote for doesn’t matter.

This is, as always, a five state race.

All that matters is printing/counting the right number of votes in those five states and the rest is just a Benny Hill skit.

Harris chose uber-commie and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate to what, exactly? Shore up the only state that voted for Walter Mondale in 1984? Really?

No, it was to do a few things:
  • Signal that they didn’t need Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro to win there.
  • Continue Obama’s antipathy towards Israel. They don’t need “The Jews” anymore.
  • Put the Quarter-Black HR Nanny in charge of the cucked White Guy.
After that, all you have to do is use AI and special effects to make fake crowds supporting fake polls and faker ads to sell everyone on the idea that this woman is what Americans want to rule them over Trump…

The sad part is that too many people still think this is all just part of the game. But it isn’t. It’s nothing more than the same playbook run in 2020 to create just enough plausible deniability that Harris can win this election before they steal it and dare us to do one damn thing about it.

Or did you miss how upset the French and British are at their recent outcomes?

So, Kamala cackles her way through scripted interviews. She and Walz dance around bringing “joy!” to the world. But when you actually get her talking about policy, about what she believes in, the cackling stops, the fangs come out, it’s just communism all the way down.

I was asked by Sputnik News to comment on her announced economic plan. In short, it’s the same warmed-over ‘Eat the Rich,’ politics of envy the Democrats have used for decades to set the table for a class war where the soon-to-be permanent underclass is used to finish off destroying the middle class so that they both can live in squalor and be thankful for whatever thin gruel is left over.

Those that don’t like it can go die in a meat grinder overseas somewhere else. Hey, at least it’s ‘3 hots and a cot’ right? Or is her ascension to the throne the moment when everyone gets just uncomfortable enough for the wolf to come out in a few million of us?

No, I don’t think Harris is at all stupid. And I think we’d all do well to put away the memes and get serious about making sure that we make this a November 5th to her not to remember.

The honeymoon period is wearing off. Everyone in the media now wants what Kamala is going to do for the country but she's so blisteringly retarded that they are going to try and run the Helen Keller basement campaign they did with Biden in 2020. The media already was pissed at Biden's access and silence, theres a new candidate and they want their pound of flesh.

So far the only thing she has going for her is 'Im a middle aged women and not Biden'. Thats it. Her economic polices are mind-numbingly stupid. They could have started fresh and done radical ideas to get support, hell they have their pick of experts but instead they gave solutions a clueless 7th grader would answer on how to fix the country's economy.
 
There absolutely is. Baruch Spinoza was famously excommunicated by the Sephardic Jewish community in Amsterdam.
That doesn’t make you not a Jew anymore. It just means you’re being shunned by the community. Spinoza was still considered a Jew after being censured by both his own community and the people around him. I agree it’s strange to identify with a religion you don’t practice, but that’s just how it is.

It’s an ethnic-religious group so yes, they are still Jews.

That doesn’t make you not a Jew anymore. It just means you’re being shunned by the community. Spinoza was still considered a Jew after being censured by both his own community and the people around him. I agree it’s strange to identify with a religion you don’t practice l, but that’s just how it is.
One way to think about is in terms of other ethno-cultural groups. Take marionites in Lebanon for example, they are still listed as marionites even if they aren’t Christian. This is because it’s a fusion of an ethnicity and a religion.this is a very common phenomenona in the Middle East. Not as common in western history tho we do have some analogues in the west like hutterites, old stock Mormons, Amish, etc. you have peoples of those groups who identity as such even tho they don’t Practice. It’s because it’s their cultural background
 
Last edited:
I don't give a shit.
If you eat Non-kosher shit you ain't a Jew.
Just like if you approve of abortion you ain't a Catholic.
Just like if you don't diddle kids you aren't a Muslim.
Then in that case 90%+ of self identified Jews aren’t Jews. The small minority of modern orthodox, and ultra orthodox are the only real Jews. I think your confusing Judaism with Christianity and Islam which you can opt in our out of, you cannot opt out of an ethnicity tho, it’s just what your born with. No offense but it comes off as if you never met a Jewish person to come away with such a take
 
Last edited:
That doesn’t make you not a Jew anymore. It just means you’re being shunned by the community. Spinoza was still considered a Jew after being censured by both his own community and the people around him. I agree it’s strange to identify with a religion you don’t practice, but that’s just how it is.
My point was that Jews do, in fact, excommunicate people. Which is provable.
 
My point was that Jews do, in fact, excommunicate people. Which is provable.
Yes I wasn’t disagreeing with that, I am just pointing out his community still saw him as a jew afterwords, as did the gentiles around him. Huge Spinoza fan btw. All I am saying is most Jews aren’t practicing but still consider themselves Jews, which I agree is retarded and strange but like I said, that’s just how it is. The idea that not practicing makes you not a Jew is only found in specific Hasidic groups. Like it’s not a mainstream idea within Judaism at all. It’s also worth noting the same Hasidic dynasties that say this all say all Jews who don’t practice the exact way they do aren’t Jewish
 
Yes I wasn’t disagreeing with that, I am just pointing out his community still saw him as a jew afterwords, as did the gentiles around him. Huge Spinoza fan btw
I'm gonna UMM ACKSHULLY you here.

Spinoza's excommunication was "never rescinded." Quote: "The ban against the twenty-three-year-old Spinoza, however, was never rescinded. There is no evidence that Spinoza sought any kind of pardon, and good reason to believe that he had no desire to return to the community anyway."

I am also a massive Spinoza fan and have everything he ever wrote which survived. Spinoza is still considered herem by the Sephardic Jews and Spinoza never, ever attempted to reconcile with the Jewish community. If anything, Spinoza was a "Jew for Jesus" based on his writings.
 
I'm gonna UMM ACKSHULLY you here.

Spinoza's excommunication was "never rescinded." Quote: "The ban against the twenty-three-year-old Spinoza, however, was never rescinded. There is no evidence that Spinoza sought any kind of pardon, and good reason to believe that he had no desire to return to the community anyway."

I am also a massive Spinoza fan and have everything he ever wrote which survived. Spinoza is still considered herem by the Sephardic Jews and Spinoza never, ever attempted to reconcile with the Jewish community. If anything, Spinoza was a "Jew for Jesus" based on his writings.
Being censured doesn’t make you not a Jew, it’s not a 1 to 1 of an excommunication. Being censured doesn’t turn you into a gentile. It’s really not the same as being catholic. I am not saying Spinoza was a practicing Jew. If you personally don’t consider none practicing Jews as Jews that’s fine, I am just saying that wasn’t really the case historically or right now, by the Jewish community or a lot of gentiles
 
Being censured doesn’t make you not a Jew, it’s not a 1 to 1 of an excommunication. Being censured doesn’t turn you into a gentile. It’s really not the same as being catholic. I am not saying Spinoza was a practicing Jew. If you personally don’t consider none practicing Jews as Jews that’s fine, I am just saying that wasn’t really the case historically or right now, by the Jewish community or a lot of gentiles
Fair enough, I suppose.
 
You deciding someone isn't truly Jewish doesn't stop them from conspiring with others of their kind to undermine your society.
99% of the time, people who "act Jewish" are Marxists and this explains their behaviour in a much more accurate and simpler way, while also being much more tolerable to normies.

That's my opinion, anyway. Many will disagree with it and that's fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back