Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Balldo's Gate]

Awesome win for Ethan Ralph! Probably sitting out there all day in the hot sun waiting to cross the border from Mexico. Trot home pig. Trot home!

Bad news: We get blue-balled.

Good-news: So does Ralph, but even harder. Assuming him being on his way there isn't just bullshit.

Posting on this page. @Peace Through Power edited their post after misreading the docket.

Only Kayla's hearing is showing as cancelled at this time, no new date yet

EDIT: To be clear, Nick's hearing is NOT appearing as cancelled

 

[ghastlyretard]

Hopefully Nick can be a bro and host Ralph until the completion of all these court matters. Would be great to have a true and honest journalist there for PR releases.

 

[genericwhitemale]

Ralph knew this was happening the whole time KiwiFAGGOTS. Got worked again I see.

"Kiwi GAYLAWGS think it's an L for me to show up in Minnesota when the hearing gets cancelled. Bish, I wanted to go to the US! At least I'm welcome here, unlike like your site owner, broke dick pedophile Josh Potter. I'm gonna hang out with Nick Rekieta and do a live #Killstream from his house, and then I'm gonna fly out to California and party to Dick Masterson and do a live #Killstream from LA. It's nothing but prime content for days!"

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

EDIT: To be clear, Nick's hearing is NOT appearing as cancelled

Unless I am reading this wrong, it is showing as cancelled:

EDIT: I am a retard.

 

[Captain Manning]

I misread the MCRO file, there is no new date yet

Posting on this page. @Peace Through Power edited their post after misreading the docket.

Only Kayla's hearing is showing as cancelled at this time, no new date yet

EDIT: To be clear, Nick's hearing is NOT appearing as cancelled

Gotcha.

Well, I guess the Battle of Jim's Driveway Kandiyohi County Courthouse is still on for now. Will Ralph actually show? Stay tuned!

God, what a crazy rollercoaster this whole thing has been.

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

What an utterly fucking lame turn of events.

Does Kayla getting a lawyer potentially nullify the theories that she was somehow going to take the fall for Rackets by his design?

 

[Mister Friendly Dude]

Unless I am reading this wrong, it is showing as cancelled:
View attachment 6324224

The Fischer one (08/20) says cancelled, but not the Wentzell (08/21)

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Unless I am reading this wrong, it is showing as cancelled:

Yes, you are reading it wrong

The "cancelled" applies to the original hearing scheduled with the judge they got changed because Nick talked shit about on stream while drunk and high on coke, it was "cancelled" 2.5 months ago
The new/second hearing date does not show "cancelled"

Kayla's page (34-CR-24-342) shows "cancelled" for both

 

[Captain Manning]

Unless I am reading this wrong, it is showing as cancelled:
View attachment 6324224

You are, in fact, reading it wrong. The cancelled hearing was the Omnibus hearing set for the 20th when Judge Fischer had the case. That was cancelled forever ago (after Fischer was removed).

Look at the date under that. On the 21st. That does not say cancelled at this time.

 

[Truly Rural]

Ralph will COOM in Nick's bathroom hollering @ Nick YOU TOLD ME THIS WASN'T AGAINST THE LAW!

 

[dustnight]

Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

View attachment 6323667
Wut?

Altered how? The stream on his YouTube and Rumble channels is a full and accurate copy of the stream. It's even still up on his Bitchute, I believe.

Then they go on to say that he privated the video on both platforms. Which is true, but they easily could have gotten a copy before then. He didn't private it until many hours later. I assumed they might have been watching live and gotten a copy immediately.

They're really gonna claim that stream didn't happen like everybody SAW it happened, aren't they?

Okay.

EDIT: Saw, not said (although both are true)

"What applicant failed to disclose to the Court is that the video he was watching must have been altered from the original"

This is the video that the detective watched according to the motion

Spoiler: Motion text

View attachment 6323728

I think he means the channel link by "watermark". I don't think that is correct. Also, it's not modified as far as I can see

Shame detective must have been unaware of defendants Odysee channel

 

[luigismanslave]

I bought a sketchpad for this, it can't get cancelled. I need to capture the grotesque visage of the gunt

 

[TexOffender]

Mindset did a blurb

 

[Captain Manning]

"What applicant failed to disclose to the Court is that the video he was watching must have been altered from the original"

It's not though.

Also, does anybody else find that absurd claim amusing because it almost reads like a tacit admission that "the original" looks like shit?

Because, that stream looked like shit. Dude was coked out of his gourd. Thousands, if not tens or hundreds of thousands of people saw it.

I bought a sketchpad for this, it can't get cancelled. I need to capture the grotesque visage of the gunt

And you still might. @Peace Through Power misread the docket and has corrected his post.

 

[Cimmerian Kang]

Wait so is telling police you want lawyer and then signing like canary a get away from jail free card? I thought the whole point was that absolutely anything you say after Miranda can and will be used against you however is possible? And it is up to you to actually shut up... Maybe this is from Nick's law school...

I think it's a two different arguments: one is reasonable and one is retarded. The lawyer is trying to bind the two unrelated arguments together so that the good one can drag the bad one across the finish line and the judge will toss the April thing entirely.
Argument A: Being gracious and assuming the bodycam footage is being characterized accurately by Nick's side, entering what is essentially April's uninterrupted and unsworn testimony on bodycam without her also being sworn in and put on the stand for examination is a violation of Nick's 6th amendment right to face his accuser.
Argument B: They are running the Fruit of a Poison Tree playbook on every piece of evidence. This one is getting a little Miranda Violation seasoning on top. The police "tricked" April into talking even though she said she wasn't going to talk and she wanted a lawyer. In order to invoke your right to remain silent you have to actually shut the fuck up and not answer questions. In most cases her running her mouth after invoking her right to remain silent would be totally admissible re: her incriminating herself. Using it to incriminate Nick is harder: it isn't sworn testimony from a credible witness, it's a blabbering from a panicked cokehead that doesn't want to be cuffed and stuffed into the back of a squad car. She could be lying. She could be intoxicated. She could be nuts. The jury doesn't know. There is a remedy to both A and B, that is to get her to testify that what she said on bodycam was true, but Team Crackets is hoping that Argument A's credibility will rub off on Argument B and that the judge's ancient judge brain will get confused and just toss the whole thing for Miranda/Poison Tree.

 

[MosBodacious]

Think of it this way. If the suspect is claiming a gotcha moment because the cop did not read off the little preparred mantra before cuffing and stuffing him, then the suspect is demonstrating that he is clearly well aware of his rights under Miranda. So the point is moot.

This is not a good argument. The individual who truly does not know their rights or that they were violated is only going to potentially learn that after the fact. Assuming bad faith here presumes guilt.

 

[Null]

If you're going, read this:

I am aware of at least a dozen people from the Kiwi Farms who intend to appear in person at the Kandiyohi County Court and witness the Omnibus hearing for Nick Rekieta on August 21st. If this involves you, please read this entire post.

I have no reason to believe anyone is intending to do anything mentioned in this post. What I mention here is what I expect of everyone who has any respect for the forum, its community, or myself.

 

[AltisticRight]

Sunny doesn't deserve to see a grotesque piggy with quadruple titties spanking his titbit tic-tac west Memphis micro, please.

Also, Balldo's argument is basically Tik Tok's "okay boomer". How creative. Funny and WEIRD even. Boomers don't know how the internet lower case i works.

If he's going to claim a clip or downloaded stream (I archived it all in this thread) is altered, can't he also claim that the mere act of uploading it to YouTube alters it? That's such an unfathomably retarded argument.

your honour, the cocaine you see are compression artefacts and the repeating of anime sucks cope and sneed was an audio error.

 

[Lian Xing]

I'm for preserving the Constitutional rights of everyone, but that doesn't mean everybody that suffers a technical violation of those rights, and walks scott-free as a result, is innocent.

That's why it's guilty and not guilty, instead of guilty and innocent.

 

[Captain Manning]

If he's going to claim a clip or downloaded stream (I archived it all in this thread) is alternated, can't he also claim that the mere act of uploading it to YouTube alters it? That's such an unfathomably retarded argument.

Somebody already joked (before you edited your post) about an argument where the white shit on his nose is video artifacting.

Now, that hasn't happened (yet), and it would be an even more dumb argument, but this whole thing ventured into stupid land about a thousand or more pages ago. So it wouldn't exactly shock me if it does happen. Very little would shock me at this point.