Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 19.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 88 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 117 36.1%

  • Total voters
    324
I thought they had a plea deal already worked out, and anyone was a moron for thinking this would go to trial?

Why would this matter if he has it all sown up?
1724085939410.png
1724086008162.png

Do I really need to elaborate?
 
Did they correct the date/time for continuance? Will court deny it because the attorney claimed to be unavailable for the wrong date aka she might be available on the correct date?

Guess this can go either way. I hope Ralph makes it there even if hearing gets delayed, especially if it gets delayed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pagan Min
When did this turn into the Ethan Ralph thread?
Kiwi's Law.
It's the YouTube channel watermark in the lower corner that provides a "subscribe' button upon hover. It would actually disappear if you downloaded the video with yt-dlp or whatever. :story:
That, or you can block it with uBlock Origin. Just add this filter:
Code:
www.youtube.com##.iv-click-target.branding-img
 
Let's all take a moment to appreciate that at no point in White's motion is it ever claimed the coke wasn't there.

Instead, the argument is (as it was long suspected to be in this thread) "the warrant is invalid, so the coke has to be excluded, and the state has no case without it, so we win."

:story:

Again, it's the type of argument that can work in a legal setting, but not the public one.

This is why I say, even if the case is dismissed, the damage is done and irreversible. In the eyes of anybody with an IQ greater than room temperature, he's guilty as fuck.

I'm for preserving the Constitutional rights of everyone, but that doesn't mean everybody that suffers a technical violation of those rights, and walks scott-free as a result, is innocent.

And TO BE CLEAR, I don't think that's what happened here. I'm just saying that even if you view this whole situation in the light most favorable to the Barneswalker's argument, Nick still possessed 26 grams of fucking cocaine.
 
Let's all take a moment to appreciate that at no point in White's motion is it ever claimed the coke wasn't there.

Instead, the argument is (as it was long suspected to be in this thread) "the warrant is invalid, so the coke has to be excluded, and the state has no case without it, so we win."

:story:

Again, it's the type of argument that can work in a legal setting, but not the public one.

This is why I say, even if the case is dismissed, the damage is done and irreversible. In the eyes of anybody with an IQ greater than room temperature, he's guilty as fuck.

I'm for preserving the Constitutional rights of everyone, but that doesn't mean everybody that suffers a technical violation of those rights, and walks scott-free as a result, is innocent.

And TO BE CLEAR, I don't think that's what happened here. I'm just saying that even if you view this whole situation in the light most favorable to the Barneswalker's argument, Nick still possessed 26 grams of fucking cocaine.
C'mon friend, you gotta fight! For your right! To paaarrrrTTTYYYYY!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Manning
Screenshot from 2024-08-19 12-54-09.png
Muh guns
Screenshot from 2024-08-19 12-56-02.png
Police are known to leave all the firearms in the house they find massive amounts of drugs
Screenshot from 2024-08-19 12-55-32.png
They didn't include guns in the child neglect and drug warrant therefore they are bad.
Screenshot from 2024-08-19 12-56-38.png
Give gun back and throw out warrant.
 
I thought they had a plea deal already worked out, and anyone was a moron for thinking this would go to trial?

Why would this matter if he has it all sown up?
I have no particular guess on whether it's going to trial- but even if they expect to plea, it makes sense to try this first. Try a long pass on the 3rd down before kicking the field goal. If it somehow works, that's pretty much it for the criminal case. If it doesn't, they're probably no worse off than they were, since it's all pre-trial stuff.
 

Attachments

  • 1724087143163.png
    1724087143163.png
    18.6 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Are they SAYING they know that the video from the search warrant application was edited to make Nick look guilty? No. They're merely implying it as strongly as possible without saying that. They're saying it was edited because someone clipped and added a watermark.
I think the judge needs to set up a hearing to determine whether the mirror of the stream is edited in a way that taints the search warrant or not. The judge, Nick, and counsel should watch the stream and the mirror together to determine if there are no edits. This is the only way they can get to the truth.
 
Last edited:
Awesome win for Ethan Ralph! Probably sitting out there all day in the hot sun waiting to cross the border from Mexico. Trot home pig. Trot home!
Bad news: We get blue-balled.

Good-news: So does Ralph, but even harder. Assuming him being on his way there isn't just bullshit.
Ralph knew this was happening the whole time KiwiFAGGOTS. Got worked again I see.
 
Awesome win for Ethan Ralph! Probably sitting out there all day in the hot sun waiting to cross the border from Mexico. Trot home pig. Trot home!

Bad news: We get blue-balled.

Good-news: So does Ralph, but even harder. Assuming him being on his way there isn't just bullshit.
I misread the MCRO file, there is no new date yet
 
Its not really the 5th. Its all about Miranda rights. The police have to give the person a verbal miranda warning that they have a right to remain silent and a right to an attorney. After they give the miranda warning there are specific things the police cannot do. But the police can generally still talk to the person and there are many ways a person can make a mistake and void their rights in the situation.

Without the cam footage, there is no way to know what happened or if the statements are admissable.
The courts have been backing off of the more theatrical requirements of reciting Miranda rights in recent years. The accused does have to be informed at some point. But the courts have also found that 99.9% of Americans are letter perfect on the bog standard Miranda warning speech and can recite it in their sleep. They've been so programmed by generations of cop shows.

Think of it this way. If the suspect is claiming a gotcha moment because the cop did not read off the little preparred mantra before cuffing and stuffing him, then the suspect is demonstrating that he is clearly well aware of his rights under Miranda. So the point is moot.

These days to make a succesful claim about the suspect not understanding their Miranda rights the suspect almost needs to be someone like Chris Chan or Dan Larson. Ie complete retards incapable of understanding what's going on.

Kayla is not retarded. She is simply stupid.
 
Back