Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kiwi's Law.When did this turn into the Ethan Ralph thread?
That, or you can block it with uBlock Origin. Just add this filter:It's the YouTube channel watermark in the lower corner that provides a "subscribe' button upon hover. It would actually disappear if you downloaded the video with yt-dlp or whatever.![]()
www.youtube.com##.iv-click-target.branding-img
so does this mean nothing is gonna happen on wednesday now?
C'mon friend, you gotta fight! For your right! To paaarrrrTTTYYYYY!!!Let's all take a moment to appreciate that at no point in White's motion is it ever claimed the coke wasn't there.
Instead, the argument is (as it was long suspected to be in this thread) "the warrant is invalid, so the coke has to be excluded, and the state has no case without it, so we win."
Again, it's the type of argument that can work in a legal setting, but not the public one.
This is why I say, even if the case is dismissed, the damage is done and irreversible. In the eyes of anybody with an IQ greater than room temperature, he's guilty as fuck.
I'm for preserving the Constitutional rights of everyone, but that doesn't mean everybody that suffers a technical violation of those rights, and walks scott-free as a result, is innocent.
And TO BE CLEAR, I don't think that's what happened here. I'm just saying that even if you view this whole situation in the light most favorable to the Barneswalker's argument, Nick still possessed 26 grams of fucking cocaine.
Technically Nick's hearing at the same time was not cancelled. In practice, I have trouble believing it'll happen, or if there is one, it won't be continued immediately.so does this mean nothing is gonna happen on wednesday now?
I have no particular guess on whether it's going to trial- but even if they expect to plea, it makes sense to try this first. Try a long pass on the 3rd down before kicking the field goal. If it somehow works, that's pretty much it for the criminal case. If it doesn't, they're probably no worse off than they were, since it's all pre-trial stuff.I thought they had a plea deal already worked out, and anyone was a moron for thinking this would go to trial?
Why would this matter if he has it all sown up?
Both Nick's and Kayla's hearing has been moved to November 6th.
I think the judge needs to set up a hearing to determine whether the mirror of the stream is edited in a way that taints the search warrant or not. The judge, Nick, and counsel should watch the stream and the mirror together to determine if there are no edits. This is the only way they can get to the truth.Are they SAYING they know that the video from the search warrant application was edited to make Nick look guilty? No. They're merely implying it as strongly as possible without saying that. They're saying it was edited because someone clipped and added a watermark.
Both Nick's and Kayla's hearing has been moved to November 6th.
View attachment 6324184
Awesome win for Ethan Ralph! Probably sitting out there all day in the hot sun waiting to cross the border from Mexico. Trot home pig. Trot home!
Ralph knew this was happening the whole time KiwiFAGGOTS. Got worked again I see.Bad news: We get blue-balled.
Good-news: So does Ralph, but even harder. Assuming him being on his way there isn't just bullshit.
Awesome win for Ethan Ralph! Probably sitting out there all day in the hot sun waiting to cross the border from Mexico. Trot home pig. Trot home!
I misread the MCRO file, there is no new date yetBad news: We get blue-balled.
Good-news: So does Ralph, but even harder. Assuming him being on his way there isn't just bullshit.
The courts have been backing off of the more theatrical requirements of reciting Miranda rights in recent years. The accused does have to be informed at some point. But the courts have also found that 99.9% of Americans are letter perfect on the bog standard Miranda warning speech and can recite it in their sleep. They've been so programmed by generations of cop shows.Its not really the 5th. Its all about Miranda rights. The police have to give the person a verbal miranda warning that they have a right to remain silent and a right to an attorney. After they give the miranda warning there are specific things the police cannot do. But the police can generally still talk to the person and there are many ways a person can make a mistake and void their rights in the situation.
Without the cam footage, there is no way to know what happened or if the statements are admissable.