Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Low IQ Doctor]

Kayla has been awake (except when zonked out with star-trek so probably only like 10%) this whole time, she's just dumb. Everything we have seen and heard shows her on board with the poly-family compound. There's never really been any solid reason to doubt her agency.

 

[ChromaQuack]

Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

Surely you're wrong, that one random Johnny come lately retard a few pages back said we're all fucking imbecilic oligophrenic kiwifaggots dentheads for thinking that the DA and Nicky's attorneys had not already reached a plea deal.

Are you trying to tell me the feature tourist with a take colder than the corpses of every raccoon in Spicer, MN was mistaken?!

Can you describe the message you sent and any attachments you added to the "superchat"?

Your honor, motion to enter "obese_farting_poopy_dragon37.png" into evidence.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

The reality is if it was only the cocaine molecule found in the test, and not any metabolites, the lab would have identified this as an anomaly - Minnesota Monitoring doesn't provide publicly how they interpret different findings, but I highly doubt the scientists and lab techs would look at such a result and fail to consider sample contamination as the most likely cause of the result.

And why would they not say 'That is CRAZY! Let's run the test again!'?

Missing, 'contamination' as a possible cause is denying one of the most basic sources of scientific measurement error.

Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

View attachment 6323667
Wut?

Altered how? The stream on his YouTube and Rumble channels is a full and accurate copy of the stream. It's even still up on his Bitchute, I believe.

Then they go on to say that he privated the video on both platforms. Which is true, but they easily could have gotten a copy before then. He didn't private it until many hours later. I assumed they might have been watching live and gotten a copy immediately.

They're really gonna claim that stream didn't happen like everybody SAW it happened, aren't they?

Okay.

EDIT: Saw, not said (although both are true)

This is the video that the detective watched according to the motion

Spoiler: Motion text

View attachment 6323728

I think he means the channel link by "watermark". I don't think that is correct. Also, it's not modified as far as I can see

Posted in the legal thread, but summarising here:

- Nick relies on Pomplum not knowing EVERYTHING about Aaron before believing him.

- Nick says that the video of the stream was not original, so that makes it 'altered' somehow. It might actually just be YT logo overlays, and he describes nothing else--despite the video being mirrored to Odyssey. (Nick, please argue that mirroring is technically flawed and adds cocoane-like white artefacts)

- There is gun-sperging about stripesld towels that is long and uninteresting.

- He argues that April's statements after asking for a lawyer should not be held against him, but can be held against her in her case. Sounds like she just didn't shut up and take the 5th.

It says "the video that was taken off" his channel which would seem to include a reupload. Screenshot taken from below post


View attachment 6323772

Again, they can review the original, and examine that one too, I don't see what the point of this is
Everybody saw the white on his nose after the second bathroom break. I was watching the stream live and saw it as soon as it was pointed out

No, he "privated" it and therefore it's not deleted. Enjoy prison
View attachment 6323763
View attachment 6323766

The officer doesn't say that he watched it on Nick's channel
View attachment 6323794

I always interpreted "taken off" as "downloaded from," but I guess that language could also support some other channel has "taken off" the video and the detective watched it there.

This says the cop viewed the video on the 22nd that were taken off of Youtube and Rumble, at an earlier time. Nick didn't private the videos until 10:30 the next day since he was wasted and passed out, so they were public for about 10 hours on the 21st. The cop could have easily archived the videos in that time, then made time on the 22nd to watch his archived version. Nick is trying to lie and make it seem like the stream was never public and there's no way the cops could have gotten it on without a warrant to Google.

This might be an American thing, but I interpreted 'off of' to mean 'taken directly from' and meaning they copied it directly from his channel. It could mean that the clip 'originated from the channel, but came to us by ways and various means'. It is unclear when you parse it down.

I think the funniest outcome would be the judge post-hoc justifying with 'Well, we found drugs, and you cannot show me exactly how it has been altered'.

 

[AltisticRight]

When did this turn into the Ethan Ralph thread?

As soon as he put on the balldo, neglected his keedz and mixed booze with cocaine.

Extracted images from the motion to dismiss.

 

[solarflare]

I came back just to say Nick is a faggot for trying to get a continuance like this. It has been almost three months since the arrest. A last minute motion to delay filed this morning, and against the wrong fucking hearing, would be more hilarious if people weren't trying to attend.


August 21, 10:30 AM. Not broadcast. Nick Kayla's lawyer requested a last minute continuance so no promises. Welcome to the party newfag.

Excellent, thanks for clarifying.

- Newfag

 

[Truly Rural]

If he lets Ralph into his home, don’t be surprised

When Ralph hollers about cumming in Nick's bathroom. The same bathroom Nick is texting Null from.

 

[Lidl Drip]

The only reason I can think of to file the certificate of representation on the Sunday on the same day that Nick files the motion to dismiss is to try to delay the hearing by using it as an excuse for a continuance. That's certainly what it looks like, anyway

That would be pretty funny, especially if it's granted because Ralph is already on the way and Nick definitely could have told him not to fly out if this was his plan.

 

[daffodils]

Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

He's repeating his MO from the Monty case: (1) Find a lawyer willing to pursue a farfetched legal strategy; (2) Convince yourself that winning is inevitable; (3) act smug until the court date.

I hope this again followed by: (4) Have a massive meltdown when the court says "lol no".

 

[Looseleaf Paper]

That would be pretty funny, especially if it's granted because Ralph is already on the way and Nick definitely could have told him not to fly out if this was his plan.

Ralph wasn't going to go any way. Besides if it does get moved, he will just pretend he knew the whole time and it was work.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

That would be pretty funny, especially if it's granted because Ralph is already on the way and Nick definitely could have told him not to fly out if this was his plan.

Note that both Nick's motion to dismiss and all of Kayla's filings in relation to getting a lawyer including the request for a continuance were filed yesterday [August 18].

It's possible that Nick saw Ralph's Xanniebury Tales starting from the Yucatan jungle and going across Mexico while on pilgrimage to Willmar, MN and unleashed a previously unthinkable plan: Kayla getting independent legal counsel.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

I hope this again followed by: (4) Have a massive meltdown when the court says "lol no".

Coke Stream 2: Balldo Boogaloo.

 

[Strix454]

- He argues that April's statements after asking for a lawyer should not be held against him, but can be held against her in her case. Sounds like she just didn't shut up and take the 5th.

Its not really the 5th. Its all about Miranda rights. The police have to give the person a verbal miranda warning that they have a right to remain silent and a right to an attorney. After they give the miranda warning there are specific things the police cannot do. But the police can generally still talk to the person and there are many ways a person can make a mistake and void their rights in the situation.

Without the cam footage, there is no way to know what happened or if the statements are admissable.

 

[George Lucas]

Then why bother going through the trouble of shooting down Josh's request to televise it? If he's going to take a plea deal and be in and out in 15 minutes, who cares if it's televised? Why go through the trouble to assert that it places his keeeds at risk due to a pedophile being there? Why go through any of this bullshit at all? I was firmly in this camp up until recently but this filing does make me question whether he plans on taking a plea deal.

Why would you want video of you saying you did something bad? Take off your Kiwi Farms blinders for a minute and just think like a rational human being. Anyone is going to fight that request. It doesn’t point to any kind of specific outcome.

Everyone wants this to be some kind of epic happening but the reality is that it’s all been a very normal and straightforward case that hasn’t been particularly interesting in anyway and it won’t be interesting or funny. Sorry boys, Nick’s not getting lolcow of the year again.

 

[ChromaQuack]

Note that both Nick's motion to dismiss and all of Kayla's filings in relation to getting a lawyer including the request for a continuance were filed yesterday (August 1.

It's possible that Nick saw Ralph's Xanniebury Tales starting from the Yucatan jungle and going across Mexico while on pilgrimage to Willmar, MN and unleashed a previously unthinkable plan: Kayla getting independent legal counsel.

How far back into kayla's lolyer's skull do you think her eyes went when she inevitably heard that the whole reason to file for continuance was just to own the kiwi prudes? I'm going with 2 spins and a half.

Everyone wants this to be some kind of epic happening but the reality is that it’s all been a very normal and straightforward case that hasn’t been particularly interesting in anyway and it won’t be interesting or funny. Sorry boys, Nick’s not getting lolcow of the year again.

Here comes the LA faggot with the shit takes, cope and sneed retard.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

Nick’s whole dismissal argument hinges on boomers not understanding how the internet works? Bold.

honestly? That's the best chance they've got.

It's also very Nick-like in the way it's presented. Are they SAYING they know that the video from the search warrant application was edited to make Nick look guilty? No. They're merely implying it as strongly as possible without saying that. They're saying it was edited because someone clipped and added a watermark. And, on that basis, trying to present it as some kind of irreconcilably prejudicial tainting of the whole case. The gun distraction, on the other hand, reeks of Barnes.

There's little reason not to take a swipe at the search warrant justification at this juncture. It's low risk, high reward. If this is the best they've got, though, I wonder what the next play will be when/if it fails.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

They're calling it edited because someone clipped and added a watermark

It's important to note that it was YouTube that added a watermark, not Cog - the watermark in question is part of the YouTube user interface

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Why would you want video of you saying you did something bad? Take off your Kiwi Farms blinders for a minute and just think like a rational human being. Anyone is going to fight that request. It doesn’t point to any kind of specific outcome.

Everyone wants this to be some kind of epic happening but the reality is that it’s all been a very normal and straightforward case that hasn’t been particularly interesting in anyway and it won’t be interesting or funny. Sorry boys, Nick’s not getting lolcow of the year again.

I thought Nicky was taking a plea deal that was already worked out? Why's he fighting to get evidence overturned smart guy?

 

[solarflare]

Filing a Motion to Suppress happens in virtually every criminal case because there is nothing to lose. a plea deal isn't contemplated before all these vanilla motions are filed and ruled on. It makes sense that he filed yesterday and I agree with all the others.. the hearing will take place, the state will say they need a little more time to respond to the motions, and it will be continued. It will probably last less than 3 minutes on Wednesday.

The state also likely doesn't have the lab report back yet that officially tests the drugs confiscated and officially reports what they were and on the actual weight of everything excluding the packaging. Again, no plea would be contemplated before these results are received because it can easily come back with the blow being under 25g which completely changes everything. This will drag on for months.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Why would you want video of you saying you did something bad? Take off your Kiwi Farms blinders for a minute and just think like a rational human being. Anyone is going to fight that request. It doesn’t point to any kind of specific outcome.

Everyone wants this to be some kind of epic happening but the reality is that it’s all been a very normal and straightforward case that hasn’t been particularly interesting in anyway and it won’t be interesting or funny. Sorry boys, Nick’s not getting lolcow of the year again.

I thought they had a plea deal already worked out, and anyone was a moron for thinking this would go to trial?

Why would this matter if he has it all sown up?

 

[AncientPhosphur]

Not saying anything but I came across this fun little paragraph on Twitter today. Isn’t it so funny and weird?

Found the article