Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I'm wondering if Qayla has bolted from the Balldobunker.

 

[where's baldo]

Somebody already joked about an argument where the white shit on his nose is video artifacting.

Now, that hasn't happened (yet), and it would be an even more dumb argument, but this whole thing ventured into stupid land about a thousand or more pages ago. So it wouldn't exactly shock me if it does happen. Very little would shock me at this point.

weren't people telling him to wipe his nose? maybe the people in his chat were also watching the "altered" reupload.

 

[Malaika]

People like Nick thinking they're clever by using slippery wordgames in their motions in an attempt to confuses judges and manipulate the courts must happen every single day and almost never works except to piss the judge off.

I'm looking forward to wednesday.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

I feel like 'the video could be faked' is a bad argument because a reasonable viewing party would assume the video isn't faked, and thus reasonably presume that drugs were present based on mandatory reports + Nick's public behavior, and thus the warrant is reasonable.

The detective didn't base his decision SOLELY off the video, it was a part of his research into determining the mandatory reporters were correct.

If anyone could argue video taken was altered/untruthful then you would never be able to base any decision off video. The detective reasonably inferred the drug use based on Nick's behavior.

 

[Finger Pistols]

Mr. AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed, how many times did you "superchat" the defendant on the night of 5/21/24?

Just once.

And how many times did he respond?

Your honor, I call Mr AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed to testify.
Mr AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed, you superchated Mr Rekieta live during the stream didn't you?
>Yes.
So, you can testify that the contents of this livestream were in fact not edited nor altered since you were watching the livestream on the official Rekieta Law channel?
>Yes.
Is the part where the defendant read your superchats 9 times while vissibly impared edited or moddified as far as you can remember?
>No your honor, but that was one single superchat of a fat cutie, not multiple. He, as a matter of fact, read my single superchat 9 times in a row while vissibly impared on substances.

 

[Pagan Min]

I'm wondering if Qayla has bolted from the Balldobunker.

That would require her not to be pilled out of her gourd while watching Star Trek reruns -- so, highly doubtful...

 

[MosBodacious]

This filing is retarded and, if are courts are so dumb that this argumentation would be found valid, we might as well be the UK. I truly hope that is not the case.

Nick's argument about the missing Sweep CPS summary from May makes no logical sense. Why would a letter summarizing past events also extend and void future occurences and concerns?

Was the Pastor not a concerned citizen with regards to the warrant? In regards to Aaron, personal animus aside, the had first hand knowledge of everything. He saw and lived it. We aren't proving guilt here, we're establishing probable cause in a house with 5-9 kids at any given time. Aaron's statements are not an island either. If they weren't supported by say, a literal cracked out video where the suspect has cocaine on their nose, it might be a different story.

Nick is a fucking faggot whose children deserve a real father instead of this slimey, selfish, cuck boy.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

I took some time out of my lunch hour in order to read this shit motion. For those of you that recall, I am a prosecutor, this is not the first motion to suppress I've heard, nor will it be the last. This is my professional (tm) legal (tm) analysis (tm)

Its shit.

I'll address each part in turn.

1. MUH PROBABLE CAUSE WAS THE YOUTUBE VIDEO.

I would advise everyone to go and read the actual statement of probable cause. The probable cause 1. Did not rely on Aaron Imholte whatsoever so I am unsure why he is cited at all in this document. The youtube video was also a minor part of the probable cause, but Nick's barneswalker should be VERY VERY careful here. 1. Its probable cause, so it does not need to be a 'true and correct' copy, the standard for probable cause is low.

In specific: "Probable cause for arrest exists when facts and circumstances known by the police officer would lead a reasonable person to believe that the suspect has committed, is committing, or is attempting to commit a criminal offense."

Would a reasonable person believe that a reupload of a livestream to be a copy of that livestream in full? Yeah, almost certainly.

Also this might be, the impossibly rare, almost unheard of case where the prosecution could get reciprocal discovery BASED ON THIS ARGUMENT, because Nick is saying 'Well I do have the true and correct copy of the video' and his argument may require him to turn it over to the prosecution. Retarded.

2. Muh Gunz

This is retarded. No legal argument that cops can't seize guns at a drug bust will ever succeed. Kill yourself Barneswalker. No legal analysis needed

3. Muh April

Without having seen the bodycam footage I cannot evaluate this argument. But April's statements might be real damning.

tl;dr I hate Barnes and the Barneswalker. They are a disservice to the profession.

 

[Strix454]

Nick's argument about the missing Sweep CPS summary from May makes no logical sense. Why would a letter summarizing past events also extend and void future occurences and concerns?

Their argument is that the information from earlier in May on its own was insufficient for CPS to take action and that CPS allegedly not disclosing their decision from earlier in May to the judge in the warrant process taints the warrant.

They are trying to string together a comprehensive argument to take down all three sources of information in the warrant:

- They are trying to indirectly argue that the CPS information alone is not enough for probable cause by CPS's own decisions.
- They are trying to knock out Nick's cokestream by claiming its "altered".
- They are trying to knock out statements by Aaron based on the fact that he and Nick are jilted lovers.

IMO the CPS argument a rather weak argument. But I think its the best one they raised. The other two are garbage.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Also this might be, the impossibly rare, almost unheard of case where the prosecution could get reciprocal discovery BASED ON THIS ARGUMENT, because Nick is saying 'Well I do have the true and correct copy of the video' and his argument may require him to turn it over to the prosecution. Retarded.

Nick being Nick, this is exactly what needs to happen to him. Once again Crackets outdoes himself in the fine art of self-destruction.

 

[Peace Through Power]

I'm sorry about my previous error. Now there is a new date for a hearing for Kayla. It's on the 28th of October. Nick's hearing has not been changed

It's available in the MCRO

Case Search - Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO)

Case number 24-CR-34-342 34-CR-24-342

 

[Oh Darn]

Also this might be, the impossibly rare, almost unheard of case where the prosecution could get reciprocal discovery BASED ON THIS ARGUMENT, because Nick is saying 'Well I do have the true and correct copy of the video' and his argument may require him to turn it over to the prosecution.

If this literally opens the door for that because of this retarded motion...

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

I'm sorry about my previous error. Now there is a new date for a hearing for Kayla. It's on the 28th of October. Nick's hearing has not been changed
View attachment 6324494
It's available in the MCRO

Case Search - Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO)

Case number 24-CR-34-342

Does this mean that going forward Nick and Kayla's cases are (probably as they should be) treated separately?

 

[Sheryl Nome]

If this literally opens the door for that because of this retarded motion...

Nick being Nick, this is exactly what needs to happen to him. Once again Crackets outdoes himself in the fine art of self-destruction.

Keep in mind this is still like a 2% possibility but it would be funny if it happened.

 

[Kopasea]

IMO the CPS argument a rather weak argument. But I think its the best one they raised. The other two are garbage.

I always figured that the mandatory reporter was just a reason for the cop to look into Nick a little more. In detailing his findings which started with the potential child neglect issues, he was doing a thorough job of explaining why he was even looking into Nick.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Keep in mind this is still like a 2% possibility but it would be funny if it happened.

Negative waves Sheryl!

 

[Sharpeteer]

Negative waves Sheryl!

Nick is absolutely a Live Love Laugh kind of faggot.

 

[Merekgrimaldus]

is there a chance that rekieta can plead no contest to avoid trial? on a side note what's with him claming that "he is of Polish descent?

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Right.

I am admittedly not knowledgeable enough to know if this will work to get the warrant tossed. I'll leave that to the practicing attorneys. There might be some "best evidence" rule that requires the video they are using to be directly from Rekieta's channel, and not a copy from BI. It's also possible Frank is just throwing a hail mary and this is a B.S. defense.

Nick deleted the best evidence.

 

[Strix454]

Does this mean that going forward Nick and Kayla's cases are (probably as they should be) treated separately?

I would assume that Kayla's attorney was just hired for show and that Nick & the Barneswalker will effectively be deciding everything for both of them.

What they do in both cases going forward is going to be entirely dependent on the rulings on the motions in Nick's case. They have put her hearing out far enough that all of the motion issues should probably be decided by then anyway.

The effect of their moves is to put Kayla out of the way while Nick fights in court. She will just do whatever he does after everything is decided.

Its for the best. Now she can get back to her benzos.