Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.1%

  • Total voters
    293
A cursory glance at the stream on Odysee shows that the winning claim for that stream dates to 21 May 2024 09:02:29 UTC, which seems like the right timeframe for the original Cokestream. This is the metadata for the claim that is associated with the current iteration of the video, claim ID d3130543fbf93ff88673117716c416255be96228:

nick_odysee_gui.png
nick_lbry_block.png

Live page URL: https://odysee.com/@RekietaLaw:a/the-results-of-my-appeal-are-in!-i:d
Block explorer URL: https://explorer.lbry.com/claims/d3130543fbf93ff88673117716c416255be96228

I have cross-referenced this with metadata pulled from the HTML of an archive.is archive taken on May 22nd, one day after the original publication date, that confirms that the winning claim (i.e. the stream that showed up on odysee.com) on that date was also d3130543fbf93ff88673117716c416255be96228 (https://archive.is/yN43m):

lbry_archive_html.png

In conclusion I think any weird behavior @Null saw is probably a glitch on Odysee's end.
 
The foot path worries me. What if you run into the Qover having a romp in the woods? And last thing I’d want is my kids even being near the coke head. There’s also the worry of having Rekieta’s drunk ass speeding in his mustang down the road. What if my kids are out playing? What if it’s me out on the street going for a run? What if my wife is driving out for work?
Well, in those cases you bide your time until he crosses the property line. Then you invoke God, Country, and Castle Doctrine, and allow your very vocal associate and confidant Mr. AR-15, Esq. to speak on your behalf.
 
The Liquor that Nick totally poured out has been located.

Screenshot 2024-08-19 154139.png
I recognize that shorter bottle. Looks like a bottle of Blanton's made in good ol' Kentucky. It's usually around $150 to just shy of $200 depending on supply and has become a bit of a meme bourbon because people just buy it for the horse stuck to the top of the bottle. That particularly sweet and caramelly whiskey (in that gay little basket with the other bottles) combined with the wine and some other little indicators around the room could convince me that April has been lurking in this particular bedroom.
 
It's a genuine BalldoBunker!
I’m biased because I hate ranch style houses, so maybe that is clouding my perception, but I think this house is ugly. I’ve seen worse, but the decor in the kitchen, the ghetto fence in the back, and just overall feel is is that of an expanded trailer to me. Maybe I’m just an asshole, and I realize plenty of people would be happy to have a house this size, but I hate it.

Property itself is great though. Fields, some forest, lake(?) access. 8/10 from me.
Balldo cucked himself out of his hometown!
He’s from the mean ghettos of Houston, incel.
 
I don't get his part about April being Mirandized. Can't you loose your "Miranda rights" if you respond willingly? If he made the question she should not have responded at all.
The absurdity is Nick is in no way protected from anything April says based on whether not they Mirandized her. He has no rights to be violated in this situation. It only becomes an issue for charges and testimony used against her.

Remember Nick claimed to be her attorney in front of the first Judge, before being informed that she had already been released.

This raises a number of major ethical issues. Nick is attempting to use a clients miranda rights against self incrimination, not in her interests but his own. And he or his Barneswalker filed this shit.

The only interests Nick has in whether April was properly mirandized, or if she continued talking after being so, is a Conflict of Interest.
 
There are rules on what a police officer can do after the person has been Mirandized and asserted their right to silence & an attorney. They can't technically "question" you. But they can draw you into a conversation where you start saying things that you should not say, that is fine. There are all kinds of technical legal rules around it and most police officers are going to be very familiar with the rules.

I think if the police had made an actual mistake on this point, Nick's motion would have described that point in great detail. But the motion is incredibly vague. Which means to me that they don't have anything really specific to point to.
Yes, when exercising your right to remain silent it is on you to actually remain silent. It's really weak unless the officer did something extraordinary to dupe her into talking. I think this is part of the broader "look how badly this warrant was executed, they were even doing Miranda violations" strategy to muddy the waters when it seems pretty clear from what we have that the warrant was valid. The only non-retarded point I saw was that they can't just have her blabbing about Rekieta's crimes on tape in evidence without also putting her on the stand and making her testify.
It's an odd argument, even if we read Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010) favorable to Nick, that would only suppress April's statements, not the fact there's 26grams of coke in house.
I think there's a possible issue with April's statement if it was considered coerced, but even then that cannot suppress the full warrant.
(b) Thompkins waived his right to remain silent when he knowingly and voluntarily made a statement to police. A waiver must be “the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception” and “made with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.” Moran v. Burbine, 475 U. S. 412, 421. Such a waiver may be “implied” through a “defendant’s silence, coupled with an understanding of his rights and a course of conduct indicating waiver.” North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U. S. 369, 373. If the State establishes that a Miranda warning was given and that it was understood by the accused, an accused’s uncoerced statement establishes an implied waiver.

EDIT: @RodgerDodger I reached your exact same conclusion, see above. The only thing Nick can gain from this I can tell is the suppression of any evidence that was from April's statements (so the card with cocaine doesn't count).
 
Actually a really nice house, i’m honestly kinda surprised.
Not really that surprising.

He really is a trust fund baby that only held a 9-5 jobs for a grand total of 3 years out of 43, during which he gleefully told us he disregarded and disrespected his coworkers because he thinks they are sheep and continuously refused to follow orders so he could read Fountainhead instead, cause he doesn't really need a job nor worry about money ever. The mentality of a spoiled brat throwing tantrums cause his parents told him he had to go to school now.

He also wasted 10 years in college getting two degrees, neither of which led to a career.

Yet he still had these two houses, it's really obvious why he acts the way he does now.

I'm pretty sure the reason the family bought them for Nick was just cause he had so many children, not so much for their failure-to-launch alcoholic son.
 
Back