US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Democrats don't disavow things; they deny they exist.
It's just an idea, bro, why don't you approve of being AGAINST FASCISM, bro? Sounds like something a fascist would say, bro.

Great Replacement is more of a sore spot to them, since they insist it isn't happening (and is a good thing that it is). One of those things they don't dare admit is happening cause keeping people of European descent asleep until it's too late is vital to the plan.

Does anybody have a source for Kamala calling for an unrealized capital gains tax? I know 5 or 6 people this would not only move away from Kamala, but might outright flip them to Trump.
The source I saw was in some policy document, I'll try and find it.
 
I think the peak of this election was the Official Biden Twitter account saying "Google Project 2025." Because we're all expected to believe that the man running the country (or at least someone pretending to be him) is so powerless that all he can say is 'Hey you should google this thing, it'll freak you out!'

You know P 2025 isn't an actual threat to anyone because absolutely no effort is being taken to make sure it doesn't pass. Literally only exists to scare voters.
Well they have to invent something even if it isn't scary because the entire Democrat Party is scary as fuck.
 
Alright i've ran through the backlog. Convention look really fucking gay and retarded. I apparently missed well known faggot HHH visiting. Guess some shit about to hit the fan if the cockroaches are leaving their little shithole nests.

Whats the theme for Walz night ? Will they go for chinese and communism, pedo and trannies or old reliable nigger riot and pandemic tyranny?
 
So if the wall street bets autistic figure out how to make a stock fluctuate up and down 1000 times a day it generates unlimited tax burdens?
think more about house values. its now in the interest of the government to artificially inflate the value of your home, even more than they do now. its especially aggregious in this shitty housing market.
 
According to Newsweek, Kamala has raised 1 Billion Dollars total.

For reference, it was only June when Kamala announced 1.5 billion for Ukraine via WhiteHouse.gov... She has enough money to fund an entire military apparatus. Moreover, she has enough money to tangibly make significant impacts by donating some of that to those in need, as is often done by her opponent.

The big question is... is the Kamala camp lying? Apparently she raised 500 million in a single month.

It doesn't add up. In this economy she raised 500 million in a single month? At that rate, she could net Six Billion a year. That doesn't seem logically possible.
She's probably using Tax money to fund her campaign.
 
Much as I personally don’t like RFK… I do at least somewhat agree that him throwing his support behind Trump would practically cinch the election for mister orange man. Mostly because I feel that would shore up Trump’s base even harder and even drag in some more independents.

Though of course, I think it’s more accurate to say that I think him throwing support behind Trump would push him beyond the margin of reasonable fraud, since I think Trump should win regardless, but the bump that endorsement would bring isn’t anything to sneeze about. Some people would undoubtedly still vote for RFK or go with someone else third party, but anyone saying there wouldn’t be any benefit is kidding themselves.

If this is truly what the outcome is going to be from an RFK Jr. endorsement, then I'm fine with Trump giving him a small cabinet position in exchange for it.

And it needs to be a cabinet position that screws over Big Pharma, because that is literally one of the only issues that Kennedy is right about. :lol:
 
I can’t help but think of that shit with ActBlue using (“allowing”) stolen identities or whatever it was to facilitate straw donations.

It’s laundered.
I've been wondering about that. If a donation was made in someone's name, could thst person claim that the donation was made without their permission and demand a refund cheque?
 
Before everyone gets too heated i do think it’s worth remembering the dems business Wall Street wing, and clintonites won’t let such batshit stuff happen let alone on peoples houses. Maybe I’m optimistic tho
I think the mere platitude of dating those things should have Wall Street rethinking their alliance with Socialists.

It really is a "Chickens for KFC" kind of partnership.
 
I think the mere platitude of dating those things should have Wall Street rethinking their alliance with Socialists.

It really is a "Chickens for KFC" kind of partnership.
Yeah even if she won I don’t see how it could be passed unless via executive fiat, half her party in the house would revolt and prob even more in the senate
 
RFK has some work to do with normies, or maybe his supporters to.

Was out with friends recently and an eccentric friend started talking about politics and how RFK has a brain worm, and a guy with a brain worm is a better option than the other two.

It sounded even crazier in person, the guy needs a hook other than brain worms.
Brain worms generally don’t give people confidence in a candidate.
I was intrigued by RFK, but he's done a lot to turn me off, like picking a megabucks donor to be his VP, and saying he'll drop out if either side gives him a cabinet position.

Between the brainworm, dead bear dumping, past "youthful indiscretion" consent accidents, and general rep as a conspiracy theorist, he's radioactive to normies.

That said, he has research and receipts on vaccines which are compelling if you listen to his Rogan interview. He also has good points about Big Pharma, pesticides in foods, microplastics, chronic disease, and childhood illness. He could make a big difference if given a position with power over the FDA, EPA, HHS, etc. He had Rand Paul on his own podcast and there was a lot of mutual respect.

These guys give a more normie friendly take on the exact points he does without the baggage:

And this is RFK on Rogan:
 
So if the wall street bets autistic figure out how to make a stock fluctuate up and down 1000 times a day it generates unlimited tax burdens?

I don't know about this specific proposal, but the way I've seen others written in the past, it's on an annual basis. So it looks at the value of stocks on January 1st last year, compares it to the value on January 1st this year, and calculates unrealized gains from there. The other way to do it is 1 year from purchase date.

If they make it annual on the same day for everyone, that is going to absolutely destroy the market as people manipulate it lower for those given days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back