Trashfire The August 21st Omnibus Hearing for Nick Rekieta

Status
Not open for further replies.
1724258165812.png
 
It's STILL on Odysee. And what makes it more damning is obviously Nick has it set up to automatically mirror what he posts to YouTube which requires the channel owner to connect the accounts.
This is irrelevant to the motion to dismiss. They rule on whether the probable cause evidence put forth in the affidavit to get the warrant had issues with it. If the judge rules that it was an unauthenticated copy then the warrant can be tossed regardless of whether they can authenticate it today.
 
Even when Nickieta looks smug tonight and thinks he owned the Karen Farms, he was still caught with a felonious amount of cocaine and had an eight year old daughter test positive for consumption of said narcotics. He can't take that away.
His entire case hinges on the loyalty of his Fleshlight. He can't deny that shit, that's why he isn't sperging out about comments on his polycule shit because he can't weasel out of it. Live-in nanny my ass. I want to see him try and be a "christian father lawyer" again.

Also depending on what Kayla's new attorney advices her (Kayla) we could be having a very different situation in the near future.
 
So we've got an up to two week wait for the evidentiary hearing, then we have a 1 month+ wait for ANOTHER omnibus hearing? I feel like Nick's strategy is just to stretch this thing so that the prosecutor doesn't think it's worth the time/money to wade through all the extensions and throws him a sweet deal.
Welcome to every criminal defense in existence. Anyone who thought this would resolve quickly is clueless.
 
if she basically admitted it how can they not use that in court? don't you wave your miranda rights when you start talking? or is it just that when you ask for a lawyer they can't ask you any questions till they're present?
Your statements about what you did can be used to incriminate you. Your statements about someone else require you to testify. The jury has to be able to establish your credibility/sobriety/sanity. She has to take the stand for the prosecution and say "Yeah all that shit I said on tape is true" and face cross from Team Crackets if they want to use what she said to incriminate him.

Basically my understanding as of now is that she is co-conspirator in the crime and as such it is singular case. As thus it is covered under her rights. So she needs to testify and throw others under the bus. Let's see if she gets good deal for that.
I know Uncivil was very focused on that and the Minnesota case law Barneswalker referred to relates to co-conspiracy, but as of now April isn't a co-conspirator and it's just a broad 6th Amendment concern that I think should be addressed later in procedure and they are trying to pull a fast one with it to get shit thrown out early.
 
Very impressed by Nick clearing his good name.

I used to think he was a drug-addled alcoholic sex fiend swinger with a bunch of illegal firearms who endangered his entire family through his reckless behavior. By hinging his entire case on procedural minutiae instead of any actual denial or disproval, I have now realized he is an innocent man as pure as the driven blow.
 
I still don't understand this argument that they can't authenticate the cokestream footage and therefore it should be thrown out.
They are betting all their chips on the leyendary technological incompetence and illiteracy of the legal system. It's a simple as that. It's the last straw that a hopeless, drowning man is trying to grasp to not be felted online.
:really:: Ya hono'. I deleted the OG evidence, how can we really tell that this footage wasn't altered by the A-log kiwis and clip channels? *Smuggly eats a single dorito chip*
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back