Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[Post Reply]

Oink in prison, stalker.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

If the police and FBI "know" why aren't anyone enjoying prison? They surely have enough people to make a bust worth it by now. It's almost like calling Patrick fat on the internet isn't a crime.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

This reads like it was written by the cheapest lawyer they could find.
Also, not much of a marriage if your wife refuses to take your surname and need to tell the court that yes, you are married but with different last names.

Please don't take a shot every time they write "SWATTING RISK AT THIS LOCATION" you will die

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Please don't take a shot every time they write "SWATTING RISK AT THIS LOCATION" you will die

Also don’t drink every time Pat uses unnecessary, histrionic italics.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

you air married

Yes married with “air quotes” is appropriate here.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Yes married with “air quotes” is appropriate here.

Thanks for catching that, I'm busy catching up on nearly a week of work.

 

[The Taco Santo!]

Oink in prison, stalker.
View attachment 6332840

Is he saying that harassing him by twitter sometimes isn't domestic terrorism? Where's the line, then. Is sink-boasting terrorism but the Lizard King and Wookie-posting is fine? Or other way around?

 

[Rimanah]

View attachment 6333034

This is just my impression from a cursory reading, but that was meh. Not the worst brief I’ve ever read, but it’s not persuasive enough to beat the MtD. Were I the judge (or the clerk working on it first), I’d be inclined to grant the motion.

 

[skunt]

Yes married with “air quotes” is appropriate here.

better than pat being married with children. just another thing he gave up years ago, oink oink

 

[John_Smith]

Was this thing AI generated? Welp. We have another 21 days for the city to respond, then however long it takes for the judge to shitcan the lolsuit.

Patso lies. His transcripts would have his ACT scores on them. They do not. His transcripts would have his AP test scores-- he claims he took the tests but not the courses. They do not. If he attended UW, it would be at one of the satellites. It is a state school and may be required to admit any in-state student. Not at the main campus but somewhere.

 

[Post Reply]

This is just my impression from a cursory reading, but that was meh. Not the worst brief I’ve ever read, but it’s not persuasive enough to beat the MtD. Were I the judge (or the clerk working on it first), I’d be inclined to grant the motion.

I'm having a hard time identifying the basis of the lawsuit. Each complaint seems to amount to: "they didn't have to do this but they did!"

 

[AprilRains]

This is just my impression from a cursory reading, but that was meh. Not the worst brief I’ve ever read, but it’s not persuasive enough to beat the MtD. Were I the judge (or the clerk working on it first), I’d be inclined to grant the motion.

I'm less impressed. The first paragraphs have a lot of italics and capital letters for emphasis, which looks more like something Fatrick wrote. The response wastes a lot of space reiterating claims already made in the original complaint, apparently for no reason other than to hector the reader. Some of the writing seems to have been competent, but only that.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

We have another 21 days for the city to respond

No, stalker, the city has only 14 days.

 

[Rimanah]

I'm less impressed. The first paragraphs have a lot of italics and capital letters for emphasis, which looks more like something Fatrick wrote. The response wastes a lot of space reiterating claims already made in the original complaint, apparently for no reason other than to hector the reader. Some of the writing seems to have been competent, but only that.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not good. But it’s a standard C- brief. Maybe a C if it’s not on a curve and I was feeling generous.
But I’ve seen some abysmal briefs before. Including ones that just straight up reference the wrong law, or mention facts not in record, or other glaring issues. And from actual lawyers, not pro se.

So my bar for a F/D- may be lower than many people.

 

[AprilRains]

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not good. But it’s a standard C- brief. Maybe a C if it’s not on a curve and I was feeling generous.
But I’ve seen some abysmal briefs before. Including ones that just straight up reference the wrong law, or mention facts not in record, or other glaring issues. And from actual lawyers, not pro se.

So my bar for a F/D- may be lower than many people.

That's fair. I'm mostly reacting badly to the first paragraphs. I admit the rest is less dramatically worded.

 

[Summer of George]

Wow. This document is pretty kino even for Pro Se Pat. Was he bashing this out on his phone at the Worldcon hotel bar between pints of pikey cider? It reads like a middle school persuasive essay crossed with a last-minute book report crossed with a dollar store novel. His lawyer is serving more like his editor - all it looks like they did is pepper in some citation marks here and there.

Bodging the usage of a Latin phrase just to get the opportunity to hit ctrl+I and sound fancy

The term is to cede ground, not to concede ground, stupid.

Oh my fucking god, he's actually writing this shit like it's a comic book flashback scene.


Did you know that if you call into the plain old police precinct telephone and describe an emergency situation to them, they are technically supposed to ignore what you're saying, just because you didn't specifically call 9-1-1?


CONSIDER THIS, JUDGE CHILD.

To conclude this chapter, I am a very special boy who is impeccably good at illustrative storytelling. Are you following along?

I'm sure there are more golden nuggets to be mined. Absolutely incredible, every bit as good as the contempt hearing pro-se.



You know what, Judge Stadtmueller, I agree. It should go forward. If the oinkery is already this good on paper, just imagine how rib-shattering it will be presented live!

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Wow. This document is pretty kino even for Pro Se Pat. Was he bashing this out on his phone at the Worldcon hotel bar between pints of pikey cider? It reads like a middle school persuasive essay crossed with a last-minute book report crossed with a dollar store novel. His lawyer is serving more like his editor - all it looks like they did is pepper in some citation marks here and there.

Bodging the usage of a Latin phrase just to get the opportunity to hit ctrl+I and sound fancy
View attachment 6333309

The term is to cede ground, not to concede ground, stupid.
View attachment 6333312


View attachment 6333340

Oh my fucking god, he's actually writing this shit like it's a comic book flashback scene.
View attachment 6333315

Did you know that if you call into the plain old police precinct telephone and describe an emergency situation to them, they are technically supposed to ignore what you're saying, just because you didn't specifically call 9-1-1?
View attachment 6333324

CONSIDER THIS, JUDGE CHILD.
View attachment 6333353

To conclude this chapter, I am a very special boy who is impeccably good at illustrative storytelling. Are you following along?
View attachment 6333363


I'm sure there are more golden nuggets to be mined. Absolutely incredible, every bit as good as the contempt hearing pro-se.


View attachment 6333385
You know what, Judge Stadtmueller, I agree. It should go forward. If the oinkery is already this good on paper, just imagine how rib-shattering it will be presented live!

He has a small firm doing this for him.

 

[AutoClownMaker]

Having glanced at the 1st 17 pages with the claims 'this is not like 911 established caselaw' now I want to see The Fatprick have his wallet lightened litigating that idea. Wanting to establish NEW caselaw over being Internet butthurt is *A* lifechoice one can make......

Wanting to establish caselaw is gonna get expensive for The Fatprick and really piss off the cops. Piss them off enough to dig into Alan being paid by Patrick one can hope. Ordering the SWATTings to be able to sue the cops in a just world would get a motion to have The Fatprick pay for the cops attornines with a 'and you can't go bankrupt to escape it' along with him having to show financials then frogmarched to a wagie job.

Costs of taking a federal case to trial is not well reported but the budget version is 1/4 of a millon per some 2018 reporting. Lets double that with inflation. To take a federal case through the appeal process has even less data but that was mentioned being over 1 mil. And that reporting was for the mix of criminal and civil.

This thing moves to a trial I'd expect a divorce and withdrawl of Robinson from the case to try and preserve Nikki's financial future. 'Your honor, I did not know my soon to be ex husband was paying the swatting harasser. Please don't make me responsible for paying the defendant's legal expenses.'

Patrick may you be granted your chance to create new caselaw. The upcoming divorce from that life choice will place many people in the hospital for rib damage.

 

[Markorian]

He has a small firm doing this for him.

He has a lawyer, and was filed and writen by said lawyer (unless he committed fraud upon the court)

There are way too many hallmarks of his oinking present for them to have done it completely on their own. It really does read incredibly similar to his previous pro se work, the magnum dopus, his manifatso. He clearly has some sort of hand in it beyond just rubber stamping his approval.