Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[luigismanslave]

I really can’t stop noticing his neck hair now @luigismanslave. Just how unkempt he is.

Did his parents not teach him how to wash? Or how you shouldn’t abuse hair gel?

?

 

[Chibitzen]

Balldo is currently alleging that the government purposefully leaked documents to taint public opinion.

Wouldn't that usually work in reverse? It's not like he doesn't have a long list of friends turned enemies to turn in free evidence. The public's opinion is already well tainted without the need for other people's help when he's doing a good enough job by himself.

 

[Douglas Mortimer]

He's shittered

 

[Grayback]

For those not tuning in,

Nick's main point so far tonight is gloating about having brought a "Franks challenge" (alleging purposeful and/or neglectful misstatements in a search warrant which then invalidate the warrant, from Franks v. Delaware) against the cop who made the search warrant, and seeming certain that he'll win it.
The misstatements that he mentioned are 1) Aaron not being a proper "concerned citizen" (no reason given) and 2) the drunk/high video(s) having been viewed on YouTube when Nick says that they weren't publicly available on YouTube at that time—even while freely admitting that the exact same video was available on multiple other platforms that the officer could've listed instead. So how would that make a material difference to the case when identical videos were available in multiple places? Again, no reason given. Couldn't the officer have seen it on YouTube before it was privated? Not addressed.

The prosecution now gets to respond to the challenge. If Nick wins on this step, then they have a larger "Franks hearing" to go through these details and determine whether they're meaningfully wrong.

Apparently, Nick once made a Franks challenge in front of his current judge before, and according to him, he won that case because of it. He's very, very, very pleased with getting to congratulate himself on this.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

?

He’s blaming you for making it impossible not to notice Nick’s nasty-ass neck hair since you mentioned it.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Wtf was that 15 second pause? He was swaying

that pause he looked super fucking gay he read something that made him seethe super fucking hard I hope someone clips it
(it's at about 30:30 into stream)
look at how often he is drinking from that mug
remember how often he drank before his arrest?

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

?

He’s blaming you for making it impossible not to notice Nick’s nasty-ass neck hair since you mentioned it.

One of the people who attended mentioned his neck hair. I’m seeing it whenever he turns his head as he copes, seethes, and potentially dilates with his Balldo.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nick is smugly screeching about his “own.”

This nigger really thinks there’s a W in the fact that he’s facing felony charges and has been exposed as a cuckold, fraud and degenerate who lives in squalor.

 

[LimeRikki]

Still justifying his alcoholism.
Still spinning today as a win, somehow

NPD is a hell of a drug. Also coke

 

[Potatoherder]

Apparently, Nick once made a Franks challenge in front of his current judge before, and according to him, he won that case because of it. He's very, very, very pleased with getting to congratulate himself on this.

So his whole cases rests on favoritism from the judge? Because if the judge is doing her job past events should not factor into current events. Or is he so stupid he thinks 'franks' is a magic because it worked once?

 

[Nihil Jung]

Does anybody remember Nick's stream forever ago when he had a righteous exposition about rage and anger, and how futile and unbecoming it is? It was like a superposition take down of why wrath is demonstrably bad , it happened at the beginning of the Vic stuff.

I remember hearing him, thinking it was poignant.

Not 2 months later he was drunk and screaming (literally unhinged screaming) about inconsequential personal bullshit. That's when I fell off.

He can tacitly know things like this, but it's all from the vantage point of the objectivity a narcissistic manipulator has, which of course goes out the window when that standard should be applied to anything involving him personally.

 

[Imperial Citizen]

CPS was trapping me! They said I couldn’t have mood altering substances, but didn’t include alcohol!

Why would they have trapped you, Nick? Possibly because alcohol has negative effects that could endanger your children and they wanted to make sure that you weren’t drunk?

 

[holyhandgrenade]

lol he's saying it was an altered video the cops lied about having the original no question
still no explanation of how it was altered
Edit: I repeat he's drunk/high as fuck

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nick is persisting in misrepresenting what the applicant said about the video.

Lying really is the only trick he has. Someone put this pony out of our misery, please.

 

[Nihil Jung]

For those not tuning in,

Nick's main point so far tonight is gloating about having brought a "Franks challenge" (alleging purposeful and/or neglectful misstatements in a search warrant which then invalidate the warrant, from Franks v. Delaware) against the cop who made the search warrant, and seeming certain that he'll win it.
The misstatements that he mentioned are 1) Aaron not being a proper "concerned citizen" (no reason given) and 2) the drunk/high video(s) having been viewed on YouTube when Nick says that they weren't publicly available on YouTube at that time—even while freely admitting that the exact same video was available on multiple other platforms that the officer could've listed instead. So how would that make a material difference to the case when identical videos were available in multiple places? Again, no reason given. Couldn't the officer have seen it on YouTube before it was privated? Not addressed.

The prosecution now gets to respond to the challenge. If Nick wins on this step, then they have a larger "Franks hearing" to go through these details and determine whether they're meaningfully wrong.

Apparently, Nick once made a Franks challenge in front of his current judge before, and according to him, he won that case because of it. He's very, very, very pleased with getting to congratulate himself on this.

This is what I don't get. Aaron wasn't the initiating party, it was the pastor/teacher/sister in law right?? What the fuck does it matter??

 

[John Andrews Stan]

This is what I don't get. Aaron wasn't the initiating party, it was the pastor/teacher/sister in law right?? What the fuck does it matter??

It doesn’t matter, but Nick is hoping nobody notices that. The pastor was the concerned citizen, not Aaron.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Nick should just counter stream snipe Sean rather than vaguely raging at him, Kurt, @AnOminous, and other practicing attorneys that have commented on his retardation. It’s honestly kino when two people have a wierd delayed conversation when sniping each other because one party hates the other so much.

The Kermit meme Nick does is gay and he should stop doing it.

 

[Nihil Jung]

lol he's saying it was an altered video the cops lied about having the original no question
still no explanation of how it was altered
Edit: I repeat he's drunk/high as fuck

Forgive double posting, but the alteration is the other channels watermark.

Again, didn't null say a copy of it was on his own kick/rumble channel until recently??

 

[Stupor Mario]

Nick is persisting in misrepresenting what the applicant said about the video.

Lying really is the only trick he has. Someone put this pony out of our misery, please.

You don't understand - only Nick knows the real truth about any given subject.

What we call reality is actually unreality. Nick has figured out that the only true reality is the one that only exists in Nick's mind.

 

[George Lucas]

Nick is kind of bad at streaming. He takes like twenty minutes to make a point about something everyone already knows, then quickly treads over what people don’t already know, making nothing more clear than it was before. It’s a wonder his stream ever got as popular as it did. I think it’s because the people he brought onto his show actually were good at explaining things, and he was a funny enough MC.