Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

View attachment 6334985
View attachment 6334986

He literally sells online courses on how to sex traffick girls and force them to make money for him on OnlyFans, what's the issue here? Why is he still free? Why is he out committing more crimes? It's insane this cockroach is not rotting in a dungeon yet.
What gets me about this guy is how all his stans defend him because boys "need male role models" despite the fact that he's just about the worst role model one could have.
 
The men who are happier getting drunk with the boys than spending time with their gfs at any point in their relationships are not straight,
100%. For whatever flaws they had, my exes never really cared about inconsequential shit (e.g. my body hair or something) and also weren't the types to do this, but I have friends whose partners act completely differently. I have this one super pretty friend who straight up lasers her pubes off and her bf can't get off to her without porn and basically refuses to hang out with her outside of group settings. He also used to be *obsessed* with my ex - he'd gush about how funny he was with this like glowing admiration that surpassed anything he could muster up for his own gf. My ex pointed out (totally independent of any of these observations of mine) that he seemed weirdly effeminate and after that I couldn't unsee it.
 
I have this one super pretty friend who straight up lasers her pubes off and her bf can't get off to her without porn.
I also subscribe to the idea that men who think womans pubes are gross and demand they don't have any are pedos or soon to be pedos. Not being able to get off without porn is also insane, how far down the coomer porn addict rabbithole are you for that to be your reality?
 
Not being able to get off without porn is also insane, how far down the coomer porn addict rabbithole are you for that to be your reality?
As porn consumption has become more normalized, this has become a more frequent problem among younger men where they've basically pavlov'd them themselves into having permanently limp dicks. if they don't have porn.

They've rewired their brains to be attracted to porn instead of females.
 
For those not keeping up with the news in the Balldo world, a group of true and honest farmers showed up in a big group to take notes on the Rekieta hearing. Ethan Ralph managed to snap a photo of the group as they were leaving:

View attachment 6334492
As your discerning eyes might perceive, there is a woman in this group. Now, a grand majority of the people posting in the trial thread were respectful and elected to not leave a weird-ass comment.

However, some of our resident exceptional individuals were unfortunately too enraptured by a blurry PNG of a ffffffeeemale to resist leaving a remark:
View attachment 6334500
View attachment 6334504
View attachment 6334509
View attachment 6334513
View attachment 6334514
luigismanslave sums it up:
View attachment 6334517

There was a black dude in the group and the forum that throws "nigger" around like it's going out of style commended him like he was a war hero.* Meanwhile this girl gets to have her appearance transvestigated because she doesn't look like a Brazillian pornstar. KFers talk shit about women so consistently you'd think they were a forum filled entirely with incredibly spiteful faggots.

*Not that he didn't deserve any of it.
It doesn’t matter what profession you have as a woman. You could just be a fast food worker, and some moid will judge your attractiveness based on his coombait. You can work in childcare, and some moid will still judge you on your looks and act as if it is indicative of job performance. Higher status jobs aren’t immune to this, and if a lawyer doesn’t look like what a moid sees in his porn fantasies, he feels the need to let everyone know.

Meanwhile, moids that look like total slobs no matter their job position aren’t automatically assumed to be less competent. It’s why women will often spend extra money on beauty treatments, trips to hair and nail salons, and on clothing. Moids don’t understand the cost it takes to be perceived as attractive by them. If they think their coombait they see on Instagram and Reddit just “naturally” look good, I have a bridge to sell them. Some women just spend hundreds on hair products and hairstyling alone.
 
And if you look attractive then there is a high possibility that some coomer act like this to you.

View attachment 6335270
That poor woman. That was uncomfortable to watch. Moids need more social shame for trying stuff like this on women. Public shaming of this is the only way I can think of that would decrease this behavior.
 
You can accept her boundaries with no ill will or complaints, because shes allowed to have preferences, boundaries and so on obviously but you still get treated like a freak or weirdo.

Some men are just losers/ unlucky in love and shouldn't be demonised as misogynists who don't see woman as people when they fail romantically.
You have an opportunity on this platform, should you wish to take it, to model decent behavior to moids and give them advice. You could start a thread.

I have had reports talking directly about me in that thread rejected with the reason "Just don't read the thread" well that's pretty hard when they fucking tag you into it and people send me messages about it. I have been told the same by other women who have filed reports that have gone completely ignored.

I then asked if we can at least have that rule be equally enforced and be allowed to talk about male posters in this thread as well, who should then just be told "don't read the thread" if they are upset by what is said here about them. But was just told "just file reports" well... the reports get ignored as I said before so we're getting nowhere really?! Is the rule not to read the opposite thread or is it to not talk about people?

It seems to me that we women are supposed to just ignore that not only the men get to constantly break the rules and seethe about us, while we are expecting to adhere to the rules which are enforced very consistently in this thread. I am very unhappy and frustrated with this situation and all my attempts at trying to get fair treatment for us have been brushed off. Either the rules should be enforced equally and the moderators who deliberately ignore reports should be told to do their job or we should get free reign to talk about other posters in both threads.
Mods: "ignore users"
Moids: "lol you have an ignore list"

Hey, at least some of you don't have to worry about being homeless because you're living rent free in these people's minds.
I consider my thread my summer home, in that it is in my name, but I never have time to visit it.

This is always why males get treated with much more leniency. Because women's reaction to being told not to do something is "Oh, okay. Sorry I didn't know this was a rule, I won't do it again" meanwhile moids reaction is to have a giant mantrum meltdown for several days, holding a forever grudge, flinging endless shit, sperging even harder and doing the thing they were told not to do in different ways to try and test the limits, constantly seething and causing trouble because they just can't handle being told "no". Nobody wants to deal with that so people just give moids free range to act like niggers constantly with no reprecussions. Ofc this just makes them worse cause they learn they can get away with everything consequence-free.
Guess which gender the mods are :thinking: they fuckin hate us as much as any of the buck broken moids lmao
Enjoying my flashbacks of pointing out to a mod that their Very Important Rule was invisible to thread visitors who were linked to the thread directly by the site home page. Much autistic red arrow/circling on screencaps was had [wHy cAn'T yOu sEe mUh rUlEz], as they simply were not capable of using logic or reading comprehension to understand UX for the site.

View attachment 6334985
View attachment 6334986

He literally sells online courses on how to sex traffick girls and force them to make money for him on OnlyFans, what's the issue here? Why is he still free? Why is he out committing more crimes? It's insane this cockroach is not rotting in a dungeon yet.
His father was a spook in at least 2 senses of the word, so it follows that everything he does is propped up for reasons.
 
HHH routinely deals with the same thing. Spergs in the US Politics General thread are constantly tagging him to seethe. He’ll usually take that as an opportunity to pop into the thread to dab on the A&Niggers. Sometimes they even follow him to the Trump thread but that thread leans Blue and most rapefugees can’t handle negrates outside their hugbox so they usually scamper back. Luckily, this thread is heavily moderated so you can shit up their thread but they can’t shit up yours (a funny turning of the tables).

If they tag you, it’s an invitation to shit up their thread for a dozen or so posts. As long as you don’t overstay your welcome, you can usually do it consequence-free. I recommend DMing HHH for details since he’s the oldest of oldfags and rivals you for the number of rustled jimmies on this forum.
I can't do anything when someone tags me into a thread I am banned from replying in because I was pre-emptively banned the instant it was created. They demanded all femoids be threadbanned because muh "fairness"... ironically.
 
There's discussion of this in the A&N penguin thread right now, how when there's excess males a lot of them go 'prison gay' to fulfill the desire to partner up, but humans have also created social taboos around gay partnerships, so men can't just do that without social consequences either so they find weird social outlets, literally like Tate imo. Andrew Tate is strangely expressive and effeminate and complains about how disgusting he thinks sex with women is too. He literally rants on twitter how he controls these women who are so hot other men pay to have sex with them but he doesn't have sex with them because vaginas are icky!! he's superior to heterosexual sex! No just gay. But his viewers that want to believe they're above it or would be if they had the option, it's not that they can't. There are literally so many gay male talking heads, openly gay, in redpill spaces. And they're held up as having insight on women unclouded by the desire to fuck them ... nah dude they just can't compete on the gay dating market themselves, but they can get your male attention by proxy and you're giving it to them while feeding into their persona of what a manly roman statue they are. It's repressed incels all the way down, with no relief of fucking women or each other.

The second stage of PUA when that didn't work - the MRA, MGTOW stuff - is like the social outcast constantly talking about how they choose to be alone because normies don't get them. There's literal population disparity (China, India, which has knock on effects on surrounding countries and then outwards from there ... china is really fuelling the sex trafficking problems in Korea). But also I don't think historians will fuck about going well maybe this was a factor, historians are straight up going to say that human relationships collapsed within three generations (we're at 2, alphas are 3) after porn became widely accessible and completely ruined gender relations because men couldn't stop cooming and jewel beetled themselves out of existence. Women retreated from being degraded like porn stars, men died cooming over rape on tape, anime girls, AI and photoshopped OFers.
 
I have this one super pretty friend who straight up lasers her pubes off and her bf can't get off to her without porn
I am suddenly reminded of an article by Matt Walsh, specifically this bit:
Her husband is turning — not just once, by the way, but every day — to other women to satisfy his sexual urges. He is cheating on her. There is no nuance to it. She’s right: it’s adultery. He whittles away hours a day sitting in a darkened room pleasuring himself while strangers have sex in front of him. He imagines himself in the place of a naked man on the screen so that he can have vicarious sex with a woman who is not his wife. It’s a big deal. A very big deal. He is not really having sex with her, but so what? Perhaps he would if he had the chance, but he doesn’t, so he settles for the closest thing to it.
I wish all porn consumers a very violent and painful death.

We're not supposed to talk about other users from the site in this thread.
I didn't see any rule like that posted and I'm not gonna dig through 700+ pages to find it. I'm not even talking about a specific user, I'm just showing a general embarrassing display of self-restraint.

That rule doesn't even make any sense, either. The Kiwi Farms is a gossip site, and I'm allowed to gossip about shitters on the site in the same way I'm gossip to post about stupid people on other forums.

Which btw is a rule I think should be amended because we are the only ones sticking to this rule while the moids in their thread completely ignore it, only sometimes get a gentle reminder by Null about it and then just keep on doing it anyway, mods there ignore any reports about it while posts here get jannied quickly every time. 🙄
As a man I'll invoke my right to get away with it. Problem solved. Come at me, jannies.
 
It is interesting how differently men (fag or strag) treat random women on the internet or in public spaces vs. how gay men treat random men.

At first I assessed that the disrespect, lewd comments and hateful frustration expressed by men towards women was partially fueled by disordered sexual desire (the old "he's an asshole because he likes you lol" gaslight,) but this doesn't track. Even frustrated faggots don't completely shit up the comments/dms/personal space of random guys putting out innocuous content on the internet the same way straggots do to random women. They just go to their faggot porn sites and apps instead. They also don't do this shit to other men in real life outside of their gay bars but public harassment happens to women all the time. The men, especially young men, probably wouldn't defend themselves/be defended any more than the women are, especially if working in the service industry, so why is this?
 
This reminded me of something that left me feeling quite nauseated, and felt relevant to share here.
I present to you, moids:
God I hate the rape alarm thing. Another example of weeb moids being fucking retarded is this song by a YouTuber Shigure-Ui. The lyrics seemed like some "anti-lolicon anthem" but in reality it was playing into a fetish moids have of being teased/degraded for being a pedophile by the young girl that they are molesting. Fucking gross. I wonder why we never hear about women behaving this way? Maybe it's because we are on average, less pornrotted than males.
 
It is interesting how differently men (fag or strag) treat random women on the internet or in public spaces vs. how gay men treat random men.

At first I assessed that the disrespect, lewd comments and hateful frustration expressed by men towards women was partially fueled by disordered sexual desire (the old "he's an asshole because he likes you lol" gaslight,) but this doesn't track. Even frustrated faggots don't completely shit up the comments/dms/personal space of random guys putting out innocuous content on the internet the same way straggots do to random women. They just go to their faggot porn sites and apps instead. They also don't do this shit to other men in real life outside of their gay bars but public harassment happens to women all the time. The men, especially young men, probably wouldn't defend themselves/be defended any more than the women are, especially if working in the service industry, so why is this?
Lots of answers:
  • Porn addiction replacing need for human connection
  • View of relationships in general as merely transactional
  • LGBTQ gayops(?)
  • Radicalization by nonstop torrent of anti-women content from 4chan, iFunny, and reddit adding onto everything else
 
We're not supposed to talk about other users from the site in this thread.

Which btw is a rule I think should be amended because we are the only ones sticking to this rule while the moids in their thread completely ignore it, only sometimes get a gentle reminder by Null about it and then just keep on doing it anyway, mods there ignore any reports about it while posts here get jannied quickly every time. 🙄

I have tried asking for the rule to be ammended for this thread as well since the moderation refuses to enforce it equally but got nowhere. Guess we're stuck with being the only ones playing by the rules while moids get to do whatever they want, just like in real life!
I don't understand why some moids are obsessed with you and a few other MHT posters. You're spitting facts everytime. I guess it's just that hard for scrotes to accept reality, or maybe they are exactly the type of moid we criticize in this thread so they take it personally.

If you're a male and our posts offend you so much, you can find consolation in the fact that you can literally just go browse anywhere else or go outside as the entire world revolves around coddling you. Being a woman, we go through every part of life hearing rhetoric that insults us. Grow a pair nigger
 
you'd think they were a forum filled entirely with incredibly spiteful faggots.
They aren't?
He should be in a cartel video tbh!
>Akron
There is nothing of value in the state of Ohio.
It does weird me out how much difficulty men have telling troons apart from women. I've never had issues distinguishing between even the most surgery-riddled troon and most masculine woman. You'd think men who were ostensibly straight would be better able to distinguish women from their own kind.
Isn't this how the tranny menace got started in the first place? If "long hair, dress and makeup=women=boner", then surely men can don long hair, dresses and makeup and become their own positive feedback loop of sexual pleasure, right? Then they wanted their retarded fantasies to have legitimacy so now we are here.
That poor woman. That was uncomfortable to watch. Moids need more social shame for trying stuff like this on women. Public executions of these men is the only way I can think of that would decrease this behavior.

View attachment 6334985
View attachment 6334986

He literally sells online courses on how to sex traffick girls and force them to make money for him on OnlyFans, what's the issue here? Why is he still free? Why is he out committing more crimes? It's insane this cockroach is not rotting in a dungeon yet.
With him and Shad, quadroon moids have terrible representation.
 
Well I took a peek at the woman hate thread and I found it ironic there was some talk about emotional intelligence and how men are somehow better at this but the past four pages are just talking about Christianity, Trump politics, which race is the most fuckable and how women have no value after 30.

Meanwhile this thread talks about the ways women are being emotionally, mentally and physically hurt by men.

They also implied women do not have the cognition to understand men's emotional intelligence but they do - they understand you have none and will need to act in self preservation lest they are harmed by this lacking.

What is there to understand? That women can find someone to fuck them whether or not they want to be fucked at all? And? That many, many, many men do not value a woman beyond whether she provides sex for him? And? That men don't care about career, money, religion, family, etc as long as you are under the age of 30 and have a vagina? And?

It's not about understanding. I understand many, many things. There is no disconnect in understanding. For you to actually "understand" then you would live a lifestyle congruent with that knowledge.

So women understood that men mostly valued them for the terrible sex they had to be involved in with scrotes and they stopped. They understood that you don't care about their careers or financial well being so they removed you from the equation. They understand many men in ways they did not in prior generations and the results are clear as to what happens when you understand men on an emotional level.

They are right though it is super extremely easy for a woman to find a man. I could probably be married next week if I put in the effort to make it happen. I could probably trick a dozen old men for sure but if Foodie Beauty can flaunt her small dick young man, I'm very sure I could find a green card man that's fresh out of his teens. I don't even need money to trick these men. I was born with everything I need to achieve these dreams.

But who the fuck in their right mind would do this? It's like they're mad they'll have to pay to be considered an option for a green card when I can just get slapped around for free and get a man.

My final thought - if sex is the highest of value, why are so many so bad at it? Why do so many prematurely ejaculate or have trouble getting hard? Why is there no focus on having great sex if it's the only thing that means anything? I remember back in the 00s there was all the male sex gurus that were basically early PUA but like... actually wanted to have good sex. And then there was this vibe that those guys having good sex were kind of effeminate because the only people concerned about "good" sex are women as sex is 99.9% of the time "good enough" for men even at its "worse" (whether that be rape or just a crummy blow job).

Therefore if you like to have good sex with women and work to learn how to be a good sexual partner, you're kind of a faggot, sorry. Real men intuitively know how to please a woman and don't need instruction from anyone, especially the woman they're having sex with.

If sex was guaranteed awesome orgasm every single time basically no matter who I was with, I'd probably have as much sex as men do. But women are not that simple and they require a decent partner in order to achieve orgasm so if sex is the highest value and women don't want to have sex with you and being better at sex is gay but it's still women's fault they don't want to have sex with a bad partner but you don't want to get any better............. what is there to understand? This sounds entirely like men's problem. Sounds like making good partners into faggots ended up fucking them in the ass instead.
 
Back