YABookgate

Does anyone remember Gary Paulsen? Hatchet where the pilot shits himself and then has a heart attack crashing and dying if I recall. Ned Beaty was the pilot in the TV film. I still remember when the kid swims to the wreckage and finds the pilot's face half eaten off.
I remember reading that as a kid, plus the what-if book Brian's Winter. I also read Paulsen's The Transall Saga, which I remember starting as a survival book like Hatchet before going into action sci-fi (down to the protagonist killing a bunch of bad guys and laughing about it, which somehow seems a lot more psychotic in print than in film). Big twist was our hero didn't travel to another world, but to Earth in the post-apocalyptic future.
 
Anthony Horowitz: I'm thinking about quitting children's books over censorship

1723757269112.png
Anthony Horowitz is one of our most successful authors, but he is not sure if he can continue to write children’s books because of attacks on artistic freedom, he tells Anna Davis

Anthony Horowitz, one of the most prolific and successful writers in the UK, is speaking urgently and passionately. “You can take the ‘N’ word out of James Bond or the ‘fat’ word out of Roald Dahl, but that is only the beginning. They will ask for a word, then it will be a paragraph, then it will be a page, then it will be the whole book, then it will be the whole author — and that is already happening.”

Horowitz has had a 40-year career and is one of Britain’s best-selling novelists. He has written more than 50 books, including the latest James Bond and Sherlock Holmes novels, as well as TV series, films and plays and is the creator of both Foyle’s War and Midsomer Murders. But even he fears the chill of cancel culture. “Even speaking to you in this interview,” he tells me.

“Every word I am speaking to you now I am thinking about before I utter it. That didn’t used to be the case.”

He has agreed to speak about free speech and attacks on artistic freedom because he feels a sense of duty to highlight the “new atmosphere of relentlessness in seeking punishment, retribution and cancellation” in the literary world. Critics are like sharks waiting to jump, he says, and offence has no time limit. “You can offend somebody in the 21st century with something you said in 1970.”

They will ask for a word, then it will be a paragraph, then it will be a page, then it will be the whole book, then it will be the whole author – and that is already happening.

Anthony Horowitz

He is restless and energetic, talking with force on a subject that clearly fires him up. The free speech debate, as highlighted in the Evening Standard’s recent inquiry, is an “extremely important subject that writers have a responsibility to contribute to”, he says.

He points to what is happening in America, which is “always one step ahead of us”, where books including Maus, a graphic novel about the Holocaust, and Margaret Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale, have been withdrawn from some libraries. Horowitz describes an oppressive world where writers are walking on egg-shells, which is very different from when he began his career with the publication of his first children’s book in 1979.

When he writes there is a “certain nervousness” about what is acceptable, he says, adding: “I certainly feel it in my writing where I come to a word and have to really ask myself if I am describing someone of a different ethnicity or gender or anybody who is different to me, which words are allowable. And that is extremely damaging because creativity is the exact opposite of that.” There is now a tendency to think the worst of writers, he says, from Ian Fleming to Roald Dahl. Yet the impetus of a writer is to “share joy and to open doors to different worlds, to the understanding of life. It’s the exact opposite of what sometimes writers are being characterised as”.

Censoring books, he says, “is an appetite that will never, ever be satisfied”. The only thing writers can do is “to stand up against it and ignore it and fight back and to write what you believe in. We cannot be allowed to be told what we can and cannot write, who we can and cannot offend, what words we can or cannot use”.
Anthony Horowitz after being made a CBE (Victoria Jones/PA)
PA Wire
Read More

It is in the context of describing this atmosphere of fear that he makes an astonishing admission. The writer of the much-loved teen spy series Alex Rider, which has sold 21 million copies, and the author of dozens of other children’s books, is currently questioning whether he will ever write for children again. It comes after one of his children’s books was edited by a young, and “I would dare say woke”, editor. The bruising experience left him questioning his own writing.

The book, which ended up being heavily rewritten by Horowitz, was published, but “it sort of made me think that I could never write another book for young people because the attitudes shown to me were so aggressive, so sort of destructive, so cynical”.

The encounter is “the reason why I am doubtful I will write anymore, in the children’s world”. He adds: “By the end of the process I was questioning myself, that was the problem. I wrote innocently and I wrote to make people laugh but when I read the book I thought, gosh really is this offensive? And that? And that? Am I all these things?

“Then I began to think to myself well how do I know I am not causing offence? And that therefore led me to the conclusion that perhaps it might be better to stick to adult books.

“I am being honest with you and open. I am just saying that these are the sorts of doubts that this atmosphere raises.” Choosing his words carefully, he says he has not made any final decisions, but he does not have any children’s books in his head at the moment. “I have an Alex Rider out... but it’s quite possible that it’s just time to pull up the drawbridge and stop.

I am doubtful I will write anymore, in the children’s world.

“That is not an announcement that I am going to do it — it is simply something that I am thinking and considering.

“How can I put this carefully because I don’t want to be on a front page announcing the end of my career, because that’s not what I am saying. I just want to say that because of the distance I am now from children, and because of the way children have gone, I do have to question whether I still can reach out to them, whether I can still contact them, connect with them — whether I can still do it… and I don’t know the answer to that question.” He cites this as an example of where the pleasure of writing has been offset by “the worrying trend that I feel around me”.

Now 68, Horowitz said his age also makes it harder to write for children. When he was writing Alex Rider in the early 2000s his two sons Cassian and Nicholas were young teenagers, and it was easier for him to observe their language and to know what they were thinking. Cassian, now 32 and a social media guru (he worked with Rishi Sunak), and Nicholas, 34, is the co-founder of a creative agency.

Horowitz has often spoken of his pride in his sons, and, with his TV producer wife Jill, the closeness of their family.

It is a stark contrast to his own unhappy and “emotionally empty” childhood.

He says he has no desire to offend people and is not opposed to sensitivity readers. But it is being forced to follow their views that makes him feel edgy.
Stuart C. Wilson/Getty Images

“I know which words and what types of sentiments to avoid, I do not need anybody to force my hand.”

He does not believe his early work would be deemed offensive today — which illustrates why today’s intense examination of writers’ work is redundant. “There are words now that we should think twice before using, we don’t need this accusatory and fault-finding atmosphere to write, it doesn’t help us.”

Horowitz is still a prolific writer — adventure, escapism, travel and the joy of plot, puzzles and characters still excites him — and he has lists of projects he is working on. He writes for up to 10 hours a day, with a break to walk his dog or have a cup of green tea.

Despite fears of cancel culture, he says he still writes from his heart, because it is not possible to write “with one eye on The Guardian and one eye on your script”. He has no set routine and no target daily word count: “There is no special pen, no special paper, no rules — just write. I try to stay free and that means being free to write when I want to, and how I want to, and what I want to.”


(+)
 
Also, the Hugo Awards / Archive happened yesterday, and the YA book award went to...

I know who Garth Nix is, and I know Charlie Jane Anders is a troon, but nothing else about any of the other authors or any of the titles on the list. And after looking through GoodReads I see nothing here worth the effort.

Ooh, I haven't been following this, so I'll throw some opinions in.

Moniquill Blackgoose: very much by-the-numbers dragon-rider knock off with some poorly disguised "evil white colonisers" called Anglish. Ho ho, very clever, very subtle.
P. Djèlí Clark: author has been around for a while. This time the "evil whites" are slave traders and have stolen the MC's family away on slave ghost ships, Also very clever, very subtle.
Naomi Kritzer: also been around for a while. As she is an evil white herself, the Big Bads must be evil capitalists, of course.
Garth Nix: Moving into the warm seat vacated by the cancelled sex-pest Neil Gaiman (whose fucking come-uppance was LONG overdue)
Frances Hardinge: another "been around for ages". Some thinly disguised polemic on bad political machinations but with Nix, possibly the least overbearing of the bunch.
 

The Critic | Archive

The mean queens of the book world​


1000002113.png
A rare case of a “progressive” employee facing consequences will not change the publishing industry

Features
18 August, 2024
By Nina Welsch

Sound the klaxon, another woman has lost her job thanks to the gender wars. But in a major twist, the casualty this time was not someone from the gender-critical camp. Tilly Fitzgerald, an influencer and senior bookseller at Waterstones, was sacked by the bookshop because of a vicious tweet she directed at the bestselling author Christina Dalcher.

Dalcher had, in civil terms, defended SEEN In Publishing (a new network for those in the publishing world who “recognise the material reality of sex, and support freedom of expression”) against one of many hostile reactions from other publishing figures. Fitzgerald weighed in, assuring Dalcher: “Ooh, I’ll enjoy tearing up your books and popping them in the bin today. Thanks for the heads up.”

In response, Dalcher quoted Fitzgerald’s tweet to highlight the Fahrenheit 451 approach that such bookselling bloggers take towards those in publishing who refuse to conform to gender woo-woo. Fitzgerald’s account was her professional one as well as personal, and Waterstones parted company with her.

This has come as a welcome surprise for many women (and men) scarred by mistreatment and ostracism by gender identitarians in their professional life — especially the arts where connections and reputation are everything.

Simultaneously, it has come as a horrible shock for radical progressives and their #BeKind allies, who’ve never previously had to entertain the idea that they might face consequences for their political opinions bringing their workplace into disrepute.

Amongst gender ideology’s dissidents, there is some forgivable schadenfreude as well as disgust at the hypocrisy of those amongst Fitzgerald’s defenders, who have suddenly developed an interest in freedom of speech in publishing.

More than 500 authors and publishing employees have signed an open letter urging Waterstones to reinstate Fitzgerald. One of the more famous signatories is Chocolat author Joanne Harris, who, whilst head of the Society of Authors, was content to let crickets chirp whilst women in her industry were hounded, slandered and discriminated against.

Nonetheless, my instinctive reaction to “Tillygate” was uneasiness at someone being fired over a tweet, regardless of her nastiness or unprofessionalism. The problem with Fitzgerald’s phrasing is that it’s unclear whether she meant she intended to destroy her apparent personal collection of Dalcher’s books, or whether she was threatening to take a shredder to company stock.

She took to social media with a hoarse-voiced, whimpering video

It was a bad look for a Waterstones employee either way, but the ambiguity could set a discomfiting precedent for a sacking.

Never interrupt your enemy when they’re making a mistake, though, and in Fitzgerald’s case there wasn’t even time to draw breath. She took to social media with a hoarse-voiced, whimpering video that made the viral video of the Starbucks worker who filmed themselves snivelling that they had too many customers look like a portrait of dignity.

In it, Fitzgerald made unevidenced claims against Dalcher and slagged off Waterstones as having “no morals”, a curious move if you’re seeking to be rehired by the company. In a later Instagram video, she openly begged listeners not to buy any of Dalcher’s books. On this basis, and the fact that Waterstones has issued a statement affirming that its social media policy was violated, scepticism may shift towards ambivalence.

The attitude and entitlement Fitzgerald exhibits is typical in the world of print media and the arts. As someone with novelist aspirations who completed her writing degree in 2020 — the year progressive hysteria ingrained itself — I could have substituted Tilly Fitzgerald for the students who intimidated me into deleting my old social media profiles.

My crime? Being “caught” agreeing that the abuse received by J.K. Rowling was reprehensible. The pronouns and hair colour may be different, but the righteousness, narcissism and entitlement (Fitzgerald sobbed about how amazing she was at her job) was the same — the sheer cry-bully meangirlism.

Publishing is one of the worst sectors for political conformism and related bullying, which cannot be separated from the fact that it is one of the most hyper-feminised industries, dominated by women at all levels including the top. Glass ceiling victories aside, there is something about the feigned egalitarianism of female competitiveness that translates depressingly well to modern publishing culture.

The key to successful sabotage and status-gain is, as any wily mean girl knows, covertness. Agents and publishers are snowed under with proposals and pitches. It’s a cut-throat, jealous and business-led world that operates behind a facade of hope, creativity and reward for perseverance. Which is why publishing was fated to become enmeshed in the DEI paradox, where diversity, equity and inclusion are pursued through conformity, discrimination and exclusion.

Bookstagram, the unofficial Instagram network for book reviewers who have significant influence, and home to the likes of Tilly Fitzgerald, is the epitome of this two-facedness. The promotional pictures of prettily arranged paperbacks have a somewhat Dolores Umbridge tweeness. But featured titles tend to look rather similar and certain names, including bestsellers, are, strangely, omitted.

I recently voiced my support online for SEEN In Publishing, only to have a well-followed Bookstagrammer openly reply minutes later: “We will ensure no one reads your novel. Have fun standing with SEEN.” For a dark laugh, I had a glance at her Instagram: “Hello lovelies!” post after post chirruped, accompanied by pastel displays of books and hot drinks.

In the aftermath of Tillygate, I’ve seen a number of gender-critical people in the arts calling for publishing houses and other institutions to train staff in the basics of the Equality Act and why it’s illegal to discriminate against people who hold that biological sex is immutable.

Whilst this is a good starting point to prevent more messy dismissals, no training can stop bookshop assistants who hide works of which they don’t approve, or prevent literary agents from discarding queries from writers who have “problematic” social media followers. It can’t prevent messages to book reviewers urging them to shun those who gave a glowing review to the latest Robert Galbraith novel.

The tide will not change with the sporadic firing of Tilly Fitzgerald types, which will only feed the progressive authoritarians’ sense of martyrdom. A more effective solution would be to change hiring practices. Instead of hyping up their DEI credentials, booksellers and publishers should make it clear in job descriptions that their corporate commitment is to artistic freedom of expression and the right to offend. Those who would feel “unsafe” in such an environment need not apply.

However, this is very difficult in an industry infected by an ideological system that is ringfenced against dissent, that weeds out heretics and that effectively prevents people who could implement such change from ever getting power.

To that end, free-thinking people in pursuit of a literary career might do as I did and self-exile from the captured mainstream industry. Once enough of us do so, we can build our own networks, connections and define a new creative ethos.

Indeed, the existence of SEEN In Publishing indicates plenty of us are already getting stuck into the project and our community will grow and diversify in its proper sense. Hopefully within the next few years, we’ll see the emergence of a literary industry that has some balls.
 
Is Neil Gaiman REALLY canceled though? No. Sure, people talk about it on X, but he has yet to lose a single contract that I am aware of. His publishers have not condemned him, nor have any of his partners in Hollywood or Netflix issued statements- much less severed contact with him. So far, the only cancelation Gaiman has received has been certain Booktwt feminists declaring they will read other books instead (which I am not criticizing them for, it is honorable that they do this if they truly believe the allegations.)

LAIKA Studios, the company that adapted his Coraline book, have actually doubled down on their relationship with Coraline in the official trailers and promos of their upcoming film: Trailer

The publisher for his upcoming Norse mythology book continues to promote it as coming out this October.

Meanwhile, Director Henry Selick has revealed he is reuniting with Neil Gaiman for a film adaptation of The Ocean at the End of the Lane, which he describes as "almost a sequel" to their 2008 hit Coraline. Proof

Dead Boy Detectives is also forging ahead with a season two with the women and men involved even going so far as to gush about it weeks after the allegations against Gaiman.

They'll waiting for it to blow over. They're not canceling him.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, Director Henry Selick has revealed he is reuniting with Neil Gaiman for a film adaptation of The Ocean at the End of the Lane, which he describes as "almost a sequel" to their 2008 hit Coraline. Proof

You're a bit behind the curve with this one. The funding for it is has somehow and for no reason at all dried up. Or at any rate gotten scarcer. Imagine that. I can't possibly imagine what changed from June to August. 😐

Coraline Director Has Disappointing Update on Planned Neil Gaiman Adaptation

Just two months after news broke that Coraline filmmaker Henry Selick was planning to adapt Neil Gaiman's The Ocean at the End of the Lane, the filmmaker now says it looks like that movie is in a pretty uncertain state.

edit:
View attachment 6329695

I’m pretty sure that your average White Oklahoman or Southern hillbilly has more Native American ancestry than this woman.

Oh, god. I can smell the patchouli and cat piss from over here, presumably a place far, far away from wherever this woman is.

Also, isn't hair like that supposed to be cultural appropriation at this point?
 
Last edited:
By now everyone knows you need to be a crypto-TERF to survive in these mean streets
Is Neil Gaiman REALLY canceled though?

They'll waiting for it to blow over. They're not canceling him.
It's definitely a case of "balls in the air take a while to come down". These are all projects that have been paid for, the catering ordered, the second mortgage taken out etc. I think NEW projects might be thin on the ground. The most insufferable Gaiman fan-folk are posting pictures of throwing his books away.

There's not many cases of authors of this magnitude getting a thorough ass-kicking. It's usually younger creatives on their first book. Even the nonsense surrounding Jay Kristoff (the Gaiman analogue) didn't reach that level - Jay was extra and egotistical and called people names on Twitter when they criticised him first but he's never been "tripped and and fallen into his babysitter's vagina repeatedly while withholding money from them" consensual human slavery bad.
 
Shallan is clearly a plural DID system, guys.
Sanderson's quality in writing has really dropped imo. Despite having like a billion beta and gamma and whatever readers, his cosmere novels just become longer and more convoluted, with way too much lore shit and a hundred mysterious worldhopping characters and gods and undeads and all that crap.
Sometimes less is more.
Am of course buying his next stormlight book, like all the others before, but I don't except a+ high fantasy from him anymore.

I loved the first three Stormlight books and couldn't finish the last one because Shallan and Kaladin were so fucking annoying. Shallan had eyerolling, tumblr-level DID and Kaladin was nothing but crying about PTSD. It was made for insufferable reading and I had to stop halfway through.
 
I loved the first three Stormlight books and couldn't finish the last one because Shallan and Kaladin were so fucking annoying. Shallan had eyerolling, tumblr-level DID and Kaladin was nothing but crying about PTSD. It was made for insufferable reading and I had to stop halfway through.
I read the first Stormlight book years ago and barely remember it. Was thinking about getting back into the series. Remember liking it, but not considering it earth shattering. Now that I'm hearing stuff like this from people who aren't Sanderson acolytes my enthusiasm is dropping.

Loved the first Mistborn era, detested the second. Think I've mentioned that earlier in this thread. Sounds like the rot is spreading, unfortunately. (The new Mistborn era 1 book covers are also some of the worst I think I've ever seen. They look like door prizes at a Halloween party. Oof. And I'm not usually much of a cover person, either. The evil and rot that is Romantasy is spreading, apparently.)
 
Moniquill Blackgoose: very much by-the-numbers dragon-rider knock off with some poorly disguised "evil white colonisers" called Anglish. Ho ho, very clever, very subtle.
Do they speak "Angrish" while being constantly passed off? Because that would at least be funny.

View attachment 6329695

I’m pretty sure that your average White Oklahoman or Southern hillbilly has more Native American ancestry than this woman.
The people with the most Native blood these days are Latinos. Team Hey Ya Ho Ya is a bunch of mestizo LARPers. So naturally it's latched onto by AWFLs who want to feel special.
 
Is Neil Gaiman REALLY canceled though? No. Sure, people talk about it on X, but he has yet to lose a single contract that I am aware of. His publishers have not condemned him, nor have any of his partners in Hollywood or Netflix issued statements- much less severed contact with him. So far, the only cancelation Gaiman has received has been certain Booktwt feminists declaring they will read other books instead (which I am not criticizing them for, it is honorable that they do this if they truly believe the allegations.)

LAIKA Studios, the company that adapted his Coraline book, have actually doubled down on their relationship with Coraline in the official trailers and promos of their upcoming film: Trailer

The publisher for his upcoming Norse mythology book continues to promote it as coming out this October.

Meanwhile, Director Henry Selick has revealed he is reuniting with Neil Gaiman for a film adaptation of The Ocean at the End of the Lane, which he describes as "almost a sequel" to their 2008 hit Coraline. Proof

Dead Boy Detectives is also forging ahead with a season two with the women and men involved even going so far as to gush about it weeks after the allegations against Gaiman.

They'll waiting for it to blow over. They're not canceling him.
I mean, the profits are there and his name is hella marketable.

Unless it comes out that he's a serial pedophile rapist, I don't think anything's happening.
 
Ooh, is it all non-sexualised violence?
I've got a teen girl who's grown out of kidfic and likes a bit of gore but (understandably) doesn't have any tolerance for rapey storylines...I tried giving her some Anne McCaffrey dragon books but she declared them to be 'the bad kind of gay'.
She really liked the Abercrombie Half a King series but I'm struggling with what to give her next

Ancient reply, but I was going through the old posts in the thread I've never read and have a recommendation. The Zone Unknown series by Paul Zindel would be right up her alley. I read most of them when I was in high school. Although since the reply is a couple of years late, she might have aged out already.

Also, my readthrough of the thread made it apparent that Correia is in this thread so I'd just like to say keep on making that hack Scalzi seethe.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of Sanderson, seems like the newest cosmere novel, called Wind and Truth (bruh) is done and gonna be released soon, and apparently is even bigger than the prior one with nearly 500k words.
I'm all sucker for longass fantasy novels, but half a million words is extreme imo. Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, which I think is one of the best fantasy books out there by far, has about 300k words, and that is already a very large and dense book.
Hope it's not quantity over quality.
 
511DZKVZM0L._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg

BTW, if any of you are looking for a good, uplifting fantasy story for your kids, I would recommend this series. It was written by the vicar in my family's town as a response to how absolutely dark and depressing His Dark Materials was and it's very good. It's a shame he had to stop writing because his daughter has very bad health problems and he takes care of her now.
 
View attachment 6337150

BTW, if any of you are looking for a good, uplifting fantasy story for your kids, I would recommend this series. It was written by the vicar in my family's town as a response to how absolutely dark and depressing His Dark Materials was and it's very good. It's a shame he had to stop writing because his daughter has very bad health problems and he takes care of her now.
I've seen that book before....

A bit ironic, because His Dark Materials was written as a reply to Lewis' Narnia series. We're kind of in a chain reaction of books now. XD
 
I've seen that book before....

A bit ironic, because His Dark Materials was written as a reply to Lewis' Narnia series. We're kind of in a chain reaction of books now. XD

I was a teenage angsthiest when I read His Dark Materials and even then thought that Pullman's rage toward religion in the last book was a bit much. You could feel the bitterness seeping through the pages of The Amber Spyglass.
 
Back