Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
Maybe this is far fetched but if what Camelot said was correct and Nick spent up to $20k on coke a month then he'd probably need to have had a pretty big supplier. What are the chances that this thing crossed state lines and could escalate to a federal crime?
All cocaine in the US crosses state/federal lines. You see, the plant that it's made from does not grow in the US so it all has to be imported. Possession is also a violation of federal law so the feds can always get involved. But they're not going to come after Nick for having just under an ounce, they're more interested in the big guys who have many kilos.
 
Has been said before but the bodycam footage would be the jewel on top of the balldo crown 👑

Are there any updates on getting it public? I only want to see the state of the house and the 26 grams of Colombian powder.
Shit house.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is cookie slang for cocaine now?
Crack cookies are a thing.

So @Null
I just went back and listened to your stream where you watched Nick’s bond hearing. One of the conditions of his release, which he agreed to, was not leaving the state without informing the court.
View attachment 6336094
View attachment 6336095

Is this tweet Ralph admitting that Nick (and to a lesser extent Kayla and April) left the state, without permission from the court, to have lunch with Ralph in Wisconsin, which would absolutely violate the terms of his bond? :story:
The conditions were is he didn't post bail, he posted bail a few days after his release so there are no conditions attached.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Gone are the days when Nick discusses lawsuits, He's now the topic of lawsuits.
And he fucking hates it, the contempt he shows to former loyal guests is hilarious. Rekieta is a hypocrite because if this was happening to anyone else from lawtube, he would definitely be covering it and profiting from their misery.
 
Didn't the request for the warrant say the cop "viewed a video taken off the youtube channel" I don't think it specified WHO took the video off the youtube channel.
Sean had an interesting take where taking off YouTube could mean a few things.

Did he watch it on YouTube via a restreamer or was the video taken off. Rekieta smugly replied the video is still up on his YouTube just privated.Sean feels this is a different kb point overall.

Nick entire strategy seems to be playing the dumb word games he does cause constantly. I really hope his narcissism takes over and he takes the stand. We need Nick’s legal statements about what really happened on record afterall!
 
That stream was really something.

Nick is dead, and that seething, malding mess has replaced him.

Can’t imagine many of his existing fans will remain if every stream is a cope cast like this.

The mask is really slipping and he’s constantly taking a swig from that odious cup. It won’t be long before he’s hammered on stream again.
It was such a short time ago that he did his "return stream" and boldly asserted that he would be going back to the old content creation and not commenting ever again on his detractors or his case. Remember guys? Remember long long ago? All 1.5 months ago at the most?
 
Nick doesn't have the brainpower any more to consistently lie, he can't even remember what he himself has said or done, so if he does take the stand he will perjure himself inside the first three questions he answers. He's used to just bullrushing weaker personalities in his life by stating lies so confidently they just won't bother to argue, but that doesn't (very often) work in court.

On his own livestreams he's constantly telling mutually-incompatible lies, and I'm not sure if its because he doesn't realise or remember that he's contradicting himself, or if he just thinks he's that damn persuasive.
 
That's not even the most embarrassing thing he did.

That's him suicide baiting on Nick's Discord while he was streaming and causing Nick to pause the stream to handle his fan having a mental breakdown / John moment
to be fair, its a 4D chess move from Manning. he did it and Nick gave us that fucking beautiful Dear John stream
 
Not sure if anyone has made the comparison yet but Nick crying about how the video isn't the true and honest version reminds me of one part of the Rittenhouse case centered around a video recording, where the defense challenged as the video was captured on an iPhone which apparently filling in the blanks to make a sharper image only for the judge to rule that it was acceptable. So it feels safe to bet another Minnesotan judge might rule that while the video isn't the original the recording isn't some AI generated deepfake to make Nick look bad.
 
he will cling to "technically true"
yeah he's done this so many times if I was dealing with someone like this it would make me want to tear my hair out

"I said monty is allegedly a pedo"
"here's the clip you lied about allegedly"
"BRO I DIDN'T LIE I JUST FORGOT THE EXACT WORDS UNDERSTAND HUMAN INTERACTION BETTER JERSH"

imagine that exchange but modify it for literally every "technically factually accurate" lie he's told and you have how he will handle being caught in any dishonest statement
 
View attachment 6338247
View attachment 6338250
How could you embarrass null like this, manning?! :story:
To be honest, I don't see how Manning's post was that embarassing. It's simping for her but it's ultimately just an insulting contrast between her and the sweating, quadruple maleboobed ragepig filming her hoping for xitter engagement. Dick just made up a quote there, and correctly assumed that no one who reads his tweets has the attention span to read that screenshot.
 
yeah he's done this so many times if I was dealing with someone like this it would make me want to tear my hair out

"I said monty is allegedly a pedo"
"here's the clip you lied about allegedly"
"BRO I DIDN'T LIE I JUST FORGOT THE EXACT WORDS UNDERSTAND HUMAN INTERACTION BETTER JERSH"

imagine that exchange but modify it for literally every "technically factually accurate" lie he's told and you have how he will handle being caught in any dishonest statement
1. It didn't happen
2. If it did happen then you misunderstood the social cues
3. If you didn't then it's still not my fault
4. If it is my fault then you deserved that, wEiRdO
 
Dick just made up a quote there, and correctly assumed that no one who reads his tweets has the attention span to read that screenshot.
It’s funny when cows do that, in this case it’s a cow who gets fucked in the ass. Usually with Ralph he’ll take a screen shot that vexes him and gets under his piggy skin, sometimes he’ll crop out the parts dunking on him, in others he’d be so enraged he forgets about the part where you mention his childhood trauma of getting wedgied as a kid. Nick is just lazy, he’ll take a screenshot and either wax unequivocally about it (sometimes via shower texts to Null) or he’ll just go “muh kids”

Anyways Nick Rekieta is proof we live in society where people think accreditation means intelligence. Rekieta is accredited with a title but he is not intelligent.
 
@Fapcop
Bad news, Rekieta let Ralph fart into Kayla’s vagina. It’s over man.
Not sure if anyone has made the comparison yet but Nick crying about how the video isn't the true and honest version reminds me of one part of the Rittenhouse case centered around a video recording, where the defense challenged as the video was captured on an iPhone which apparently filling in the blanks to make a sharper image only for the judge to rule that it was acceptable. So it feels safe to bet another Minnesotan judge might rule that while the video isn't the original the recording isn't some AI generated deepfake to make Nick look bad.
That was Wisconsin.
 
Kino Kasino showed it to him and the solving was that the Denny's menu itself is hard to read / decipher and DSP having actually eaten at Denny's understood that. It doesn't really explain the cop aspect, but it seems to be a decent explanation.
While I can appreciate that DSP is coming into the sektur cold and is trying to make sense of this nonsense the best he can, he's wrong in his interpretation. Nick was talking to Kurt about stupid cops, stupid judges, etc. and the joke was aimed at the cops. Something something cops are dumb. I don't know, I'm still baffled by it all.
 
Nick's problem with women is likely from a couple of angles from his childhood, but likely not from the money dynamic.
  • Dad wasn't home for several years, as he was working at Cray in Minnesota and commuting back once a month to Houston. Mom was the de facto head of house for some time until they moved north. (This is why he wouldn't shut up about the lost Starscream, it was a gift from Dad for being gone.)
  • Nick has an older (half?) sister, who apparently dressed Nick up as a girl at least once. She may have been the dominant force in his young life.
  • The trust likely wasn't a factor in this. Celeste's Mom and Dad didn't get the stock rewards until Nick was older. They were still doing well, but not "we'll add a wing to the hospital" well. Even then, grandpa was the one who earned the stock. I don't know who's running the existing Trust. (For all we know, it could be Ty Beard.) Mom maybe still ran the purse strings in the house, given that dad was gone in the early years, but it wasn't while sitting on a Scrooge McDuck pile of money.
I think that more than the female angle, Nick shares a lot of his issues with lowtax. There was a certain malaise for late gen xers and early millennials, you could see it in the music in America. It was cool not to care.

Beyond the zeitgeist, both Nick and Rich never really had to own up to their own actions. Mommy and or Daddy was always there to make things better. Hell, they both managed to fail upwards in spite of themselves. Lowtax's ultimate enemies, in his mind, were the shitty forum users who would dare go against him, as well as his wife and ex-wife. Nick probably hates Kayla at some level but can't admit it. But like lowtax, he hates his former pay pigs. Instead of a wife to (openly) hate, he hates the farms as his jilted lover.

(Many other parallels- pedos for friends, their response to adversity ("muh kids"), their response to success, their falling into drugs...)

I know Nick has NPD and thus is unlikely to self delete, but I still see that as the most likely outcome for him, because it's the easy way out. You know, if you can get his guns back, and when the money runs out.

Edit: clarity and grammar
 
Last edited:
Back