Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 19.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 89 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 16.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 119 36.3%

  • Total voters
    328
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive. Nick also claimed that it is on video (bodycam footage?). Is this something Nick tells people to try and control the narrative, or is he really wanting to try this as a defense? Is this the "full story" he keeps saying will come out? I wonder if he means to admit that there was cocaine in his house or if he intends to say the police brought cocaine into his house.
How did the cop get cocaine metabolites on their gloves?
 
How did the cop get cocaine metabolites on their gloves?
You know how in Elden Ring when Melania lost to Rhadan she caused the Scarlet Rot within her to blossom turning the entire region into a poisonous shithole? That's pretty much what the cop did but with cocaine instead of the rot as soon as he realized he had no way to defeat Racket's nigger tier legal knowledge.
Sadly it was very bad for property values and any attempts to sell adjacent properties would have their price depressed by the semi apocalyptic event.
 
The funniest thing is that the video probably could matter less, the officer asking for the warrant never claimed the pixels on his massive disgusting nose that April sucks for any drug leftovers were cocaine and he based his assumptions on behavior as well. The judge signed the warrant under these circumstances and drugs were found.
The officer was pretty careful and thorough on his report, trying to poke holes on pretty meaningless semantics - only their retarded barneswalker team can read take off as "sourced from" specially after the officer already used "taken off the internet" before - is a fucking last gasp.
Eat shit, lying LARPing - as a lawyer, christian, conservative, father... everything he build his online persona is a lie - faggot.
 
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive.
Ignoring the metabolites making this physically impossible, this is highly unlikely on the face of it.

You mean to tell me the cops were handling loose cocaine - not packets? - in gloves and forgot to take off the gloves after completing evidence recovery. The same cop that completes the evidence recovery then, still wearing gloves, made physical contact with one of the children and specifically touched her hair.

Nevermind the cops went in there expecting to find cocaine, expecting there to be kids in the house, and it is likely that they would have planned to separate the kids - using CPS, Sweep was present at this point right? - and recover evidence. Nothing they found was unexpected, and this would have been routine work for them.

None of that would be impossible, but again this would be the result of terrible planning that we haven't seen at all this far from the police or CPS in this case.

Then the section of hair they touched just so happens to be the hair recovered by Minnesota Monitoring for the recovery of the hair? Was this the same day - I thought it happened after the fact, the kids would have been showered and changed... Again, not necessarily impossible, but incredibly unlikely.

Then you add in metabolites, anti-contamination protocols... If this is true that he said this to EVS, Nick is outright lying. I believe EVS though, as it corroborates Ralphs belief that the hair test would be "thrown out", but I'm not even sure it can be "thrown out" of the CPS case - it may impact sentencing decisions in the criminal case, but it's immaterial as to the charges. The hair test is highly embarrassing for Nick, but I don't really think it matters legally for him anymore.
 
I'm glad Nick didn't just take a plea, because seeing him desperately argue that the cop lied because he wrote that the video has been "taken off" instead of "taken down" and that it was not "THE" video but merely an exact copy of THE video is so fucking funny and ridiculous.

This is like "no honey my belt buckle was loose and my pants fell down and at the same time I slipped and fell onto the nanny who was leaning over the bed because she was straightening the pillows!! It was all an accident!" levels of retarded lying.
 
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive. Nick also claimed that it is on video (bodycam footage?). Is this something Nick tells people to try and control the narrative, or is he really wanting to try this as a defense? Is this the "full story" he keeps saying will come out? I wonder if he means to admit that there was cocaine in his house or if he intends to say the police brought cocaine into his house.

View attachment 6341978
I would have to assume that cleaning the hair before a sample is taken is standard in the testing process to ensure the integrity of the test.
 
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive.
so rekieta just admitted that the 26g of coke under his bed is actually cocaine to evs. because if the "powdery substance" under his bed was not coke, how would that give a positive result for coke on the daughter's hair (assuming rekieta's account about the false positive is correct)?
 
I would have to assume that cleaning the hair before a sample is taken is standard in the testing process to ensure the integrity of the test.
It is, plus as people are pointing out they are not just testing for the cocaine molecule, but also what the body breaks it down into.

According to what's available online, you'll usually find cocaine and two different cocaine metabolites within a positive test. It will be designed this way so that it is possible to tell the difference between a positive result caused by consumption of a substance, and environmental contamination.

This is a mature technology, about 30 years old, it is time tested in law courts across the world - and odd results will have been detected and explained already. If this was just cocaine I would guarantee you it wouldn't have been recorded as a positive test, more likely it would be deemed as inconclusive and a retest would occur.
 
Nick's arguments are all retarded so lets dig in

1. "its not a motion to suppress" Motion to suppress is in the title, fucking moron.

2. "the cop lied!" The cop didn't lie, you are twisting language into a pretzel that at best makes it seem like the cop used inprecise language, the reality is we all understand what he is saying "muh compression" is an argument against it being used at trial, not probable cause.

3. "Muh CPS determined it wasn't child abuse" SO THE FUCK WHAT THEY GOT A WARRANT FOR DRUGS NICK. THE DRUGS. THE DRUGS NICK. THE NEGLECT COMES BECAUSE NOW THEY KNOW YOU HAVE DRUGS. TONS OF DRUGS.
The cop watched the stream and saw what he saw. He wasn't trying to hide that he didn't watch it live or directly on Nick's channel: let's get real - there was no reason for him to do so bc there's no substantive difference between the live stream and some archive of it. All that Nick is trying to suggest is that the cop was lying to hide...something (lol the projection!).
The officer was pretty careful and thorough on his report, trying to poke holes on pretty meaningless semantics - only their retarded barneswalker team can read take off as "sourced from" specially after the officer already used "taken off the internet" before - is a fucking last gasp.

Elsewhere in the warrant he says '...taken off of the internet...' in regards to Nick having privated the stream. In that context, the idea that he is lying is much less likely.

There is also the fact that he cites how long thr whole stream was and the timestamp for the coke nose.

It would be so funny if Pomplun says that he witnessed it live, and/or they get a true ans honest copy of the video in over Nick's objection.

What gets me is Nick seems to be trying desperately, to force the Judge to watch the entire Cokestream. Be it from Odyssey or an authenticated copy from Google. Nick's nonsense is going to force the Judge to watch the whole thing.

Do we all remember just how bad that stream was? What things Nick was raving about? Remember Judge Pussy Licquor?

Show of hands, who thinks this is gonna end well for Nick? A lawyer of such rare skill he could seemingly argue a traffic ticket up to the death penalty.
I can't fucking wait for the court to lose patience and demand an original copy of the stream, and then have to sit through pussy liquor and anime sucks cope and sneed arcs yet again. No doubt he'll act like this is what he wanted all along and claim that it's actually an epic win they're not using Cog's tainted copy, and that he's glad they agreed with him that the police officer was deceitful not to use the true and honest version.

The Rule of Completness is that they have to watch the WHOLE thing if someone thinks that the other side is being disingenuous.

An internet lawyer told me so!

EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive.
How did the cop get cocaine metabolites on their gloves?
so rekieta just admitted that the 26g of coke under his bed is actually cocaine to evs. because if the "powdery substance" under his bed was not coke, how would that give a positive result for coke on the daughter's hair (assuming rekieta's account about the false positive is correct)?

This is just an example of Nick's double-talk. Unless he is saying the cops planted the evidence.

Oh! I forgot! Nick clarified he is NOT saying that! I guess we are back to cochise being there!

Ignoring the metabolites making this physically impossible, this is highly unlikely on the face of it.

You mean to tell me the cops were handling loose cocaine - not packets? - in gloves and forgot to take off the gloves after completing evidence recovery. The same cop that completes the evidence recovery then, still wearing gloves, made physical contact with one of the children and specifically touched her hair.

Nevermind the cops went in there expecting to find cocaine, expecting there to be kids in the house, and it is likely that they would have planned to separate the kids - using CPS, Sweep was present at this point right? - and recover evidence. Nothing they found was unexpected, and this would have been routine work for them.

None of that would be impossible, but again this would be the result of terrible planning that we haven't seen at all this far from the police or CPS in this case.

Then the section of hair they touched just so happens to be the hair recovered by Minnesota Monitoring for the recovery of the hair? Was this the same day - I thought it happened after the fact, the kids would have been showered and changed... Again, not necessarily impossible, but incredibly unlikely.

Then you add in metabolites, anti-contamination protocols... If this is true that he said this to EVS, Nick is outright lying. I believe EVS though, as it corroborates Ralphs belief that the hair test would be "thrown out", but I'm not even sure it can be "thrown out" of the CPS case - it may impact sentencing decisions in the criminal case, but it's immaterial as to the charges. The hair test is highly embarrassing for Nick, but I don't really think it matters legally for him anymore.
I would have to assume that cleaning the hair before a sample is taken is standard in the testing process to ensure the integrity of the test
It is, plus as people are pointing out they are not just testing for the cocaine molecule, but also what the body breaks it down into.

According to what's available online, you'll usually find cocaine and two different cocaine metabolites within a positive test. It will be designed this way so that it is possible to tell the difference between a positive result caused by consumption of a substance, and environmental contamination.

This is a mature technology, about 30 years old, it is time tested in law courts across the world - and odd results will have been detected and explained already. If this was just cocaine I would guarantee you it wouldn't have been recorded as a positive test, more likely it would be deemed as inconclusive and a retest would occur.

The have been a lot of posts ITT of papers showing a wash is standard--specifically for Omega Laboratories. However, there was a paper showing that hair could be soaked in cocaine and test highly for metabolites. It took significant effort and concentration.

This ultimately does not help us as we are back to the start of the circular logic train of the Phantom Cocaine where:

There Was No Cocaine-Cops Planted it-The Test Was Contaminated
 
so rekieta just admitted that the 26g of coke under his bed is actually cocaine to evs. because if the "powdery substance" under his bed was not coke, how would that give a positive result for coke on the daughter's hair (assuming rekieta's account about the false positive is correct)?
No the cops planted the cocaine and then rubbed it into his kid's hair. Please try to keep up.
 
I would go as far as to argue that the audio alone would help establish probable cause. But of course audio compression can happen too, so maybe my ears misheard him reread the same furry fart porn superchat a dozen times.
I'm saying you could compress the video down to like 144p and still tell Nick was fucked up
 
April is out in "Hollywood" too, from the trailer park to the second home of Lord Balldo, my girl is glowed up Screenshot_20240824-080512_Instagram.jpg
Screenshot_20240824-080723_Instagram.jpg
Screenshot_20240824-080738_Instagram.jpg
Screenshot_20240824-080744_Instagram.jpg
Screenshot_20240824-084015_Instagram.jpg
 
EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive. Nick also claimed that it is on video (bodycam footage?). Is this something Nick tells people to try and control the narrative, or is he really wanting to try this as a defense? Is this the "full story" he keeps saying will come out? I wonder if he means to admit that there was cocaine in his house or if he intends to say the police brought cocaine into his house.

View attachment 6341978
The full story hasn't come out yet because Nick hasn't finished fabricating it yet.
How did the cop get cocaine metabolites on their gloves?
This is the lie Nick was telling before he learned how a cocaine hair follicle test actually works. Now that he knows it tests for the metabolites instead of literally just cocaine itself he has to come up with a new one.
 
Last edited:
Back