- Joined
- Mar 13, 2024
My intuition tells me it's gonna be a long break.probably taking a break from defending pedos in A&N
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My intuition tells me it's gonna be a long break.probably taking a break from defending pedos in A&N
i dislike the label of "feminism" because it suggests women came up with this shit
Women did come up with the concept of feminism so your point is invalid. Are you perhaps one of those "male feminists" (read: men that want some vapid cunt's pussy?)Mary Wollstonecraft is seen by many as a founder of feminism due to her 1792 book titled A Vindication of the Rights of Woman in which she argues that class and private property are the basis of discrimination against women, and that women as much as men needed equal rights.
This is horrifying and unfortunately also informative.-snip-
That would probably depend on how you define femcel.Skimming through this thread made me think about the concept of incels and femcels so I am wondering... Do femcels actually exist? If yes, do you think they are of the same caliber as incels? If they do not exist, why?
Depends on your definition of incel. If it's a guy who can't convince a woman to have sex with him without resorting to prostitutes or drugs then no, femcels aren't real. It's just another label they collect for their bio to make up for a nonexistent personality.Skimming through this thread made me think about the concept of incels and femcels so I am wondering... Do femcels actually exist? If yes, do you think they are of the same caliber as incels? If they do not exist, why?
You can't stop sponsoring them. We subsidize them through taxes and "equal pay for unequal work" policies.After all if you are told no woman will ever bear your child, you might as well stop sponsoring them
That's where living of welfare comes in. You can't really dodge sales tax but it doesn't hurt as much if it's government money.You can't stop sponsoring them. We subsidize them through taxes and "equal pay for unequal work" policies.
Depends on your definition of incel. If it's a guy who can't convince a woman to have sex with him without resorting to prostitutes or drugs then no, femcels aren't real. It's just another label they collect for their bio to make up for a nonexistent personality.
Even malformed 1/10 "women" that make you question whether God exists get more action than a 4/10 guy.
View attachment 6344815
On a semi-related note, it's part of the reason why femoids will never let sexbots be a thing. It would crash the pussy market harder than the twin towers. After all if you are told no woman will ever bear your child, you might as well stop sponsoring them and get yourself a 1:1 replica of your oneitis from HS and pork her until your hips turn to dust.
To be perfectly charitable and fair to the whamen, I can sorta understand where theyre coming from. Im 200% sure if most men were given a 3/10 woman with belly fat, saggy tits, greasy hair, a big nose, hairy backside, no hygiene and glasses, they wouldnt take that (most of them anyways, Im sure there are guys out there who would love to pork pigs). Most men wouldnt date women who are in the Deathfats or Beauty Parlor section. Similarly most women dont get what they want from the 0-6 guys, granted some of them are fucking retarded with their ridiculous contradictory expectations but most of the time their expectations are logically sound and valid. All of sexual interactions always comes down to some form of market dynamics, its just that the market dynamics in this case are between two complementary and distinct parties who do not want to negotiate. Compromise seems to be the best course of solution. Also men are just in general biologically equipped to handle things like loneliness, women are not and are more likely to self eliminate when they fail to meet market demands (if they have some sense of shame. Most of the time they dont and try to blame everybody else for the state of the market). This does not mean Im supporting the women community, I hate the female community equally but I like/support individual women depending on their attitudes and predispositions. Women hate is like the Jewish question, you have to be scientific logical clear cut and most importantly objectively correct otherwise your opinions will be dismissed out of hand as hate.
They exist but are of two categories. Theyre genuinely ugly and repulsive or theyre inept at social situations and are too scared to explore. The latter is more romanticized but the former also exists. The latter is also similar to a large percentage of the incel community. Theyre not the same psychologically although their behaviors will definitely be very similar. Also theres a section of femcels who are not really femcels but are just very progressive women, what the internet calls political lesbians who embrace political lesbianism. I dont know if they should be called femcels even if they fall under the category, its similar to how the media calls most men on the right incels even if theyre in relationships, Henry Cavill being a very good example.Skimming through this thread made me think about the concept of incels and femcels so I am wondering... Do femcels actually exist? If yes, do you think they are of the same caliber as incels? If they do not exist, why?
Thank God we don't send femoids to war because they would probably just run around, yelling and panicking, before getting krumped like some puny humies that they are.
The US military measured the performance of only male units against mixed units.Thank God we don't send femoids to war because they would probably just run around, yelling and panicking, before getting krumped like some puny humies that they are.
There was a reason why families used to marry off their daughters very early into adulthood after vetting suitors, and that process being seen as barbaric these days reflects very poorly on modern society. Women never stop being teenagers, and there's no way in hell you can trust a dumbass fresh out of high school to not make a life ruining decision when an entire cult is chanting that she can do no wrong.It turns out, though, that social shaming of sluts and prostitutes was not about oppressing women, but about protecting them, particularly about protecting them from the colossally insane, stupid choices they are prone to making in their twenties when set "free."
Go to crystal.cafe, a lot of their stories are more believable and I'm sure there are a lot more normal non pozzed women on there than reddit, especially femcels. Never take research data or observations from reddit unless you're performing a study on the tranny demographic. Each social media platform has a different demographic and psychology they cater to, reddit caters to trannies and the hyper progressive herd of men and women droids who are not the baseline for normality.Remember: the female foreveralone reddit had to get DMs disabled because the women posting got too many offers to date.
I don't want to sound pompous but I'm a perfect 7/10, no more no less. I'm looking at a life of solitude for the rest of my life, for the most part. I will not take anybody less than a 6 under any circumstance even if she's really hot. A 4 could be anybody from repulsively ugly but intelligent to extremely hot but eats glue. It's each person's preferences at the end of the day, the market dynamics are evaluated on a general broad level. On a broad level yes women go for people above their standards while men are okay with people below their standards, that's a general pattern but its not axiomatic. From my observations, there are many women demographics who want different types of men for different reasons, not always Chad all the time. At some point in their life maybe yes but not all the time and not for relationship purposes (which is depressing cause there is definitely a slut demographic who want chad for cock and cuck for cash). Men are also the same, everybody has wanted a Playboy model or a pornstar at some point in their lives, not for a relationship but definitely at some point. The difference is men are willing to compromise the more they grow out of it, generally, while women refuse to compromise. The man hate thread and similar people will say that's because men are desperate for sex. I think it's because men are a lot more honest about wanting a relationship while women delude themselves into thinking that they don't need relationships at all or they're gambling addicts and stake everything on Chad even after losing a million times. The ones who blindly go after Chad are usually 4s, the glue eating bimbos, who lust after serial killers and shit. I would bet my nuts that nobody especially in this thread would want a glue eating bimbo under any circumstance. The socially inept femcels are among the younger demographic who are just introducing themselves to adult sexual dynamics, 16-24 if we're being accurate, while the political lesbians are closer to 40 way beyond the wall, what I like to call cat ladies. But femcels do exist, they're just like incels and behave like incels (not the misogynist demographic, the socially awkward cringe demographic), they're just normal people and chances are they'll grow out of it.I disagree. No doubt a 4/10 is anyone's first choice, but when you've been alone for long enough you'll take it. That is why femcels cannot exist, because it's not that nobody wants them...it's that nobody chad enough wants them.
I thought they loved India though? Those spiritual travels there they keep talking about?Um... India?
You noticed Gorlock and not Dylan? Actually, I think they're all troons.Dafuq gorlock the destroyer is doing there?. It's not a woman, it's a man with bitchtits
Theyre all troons, from left to right, Dylan Mulvaney Gorlock Random Gay Male Faggot who flashed bitch tits next to Biden. If you cant even spot women properly you dont belong on the women hate thread.
If you cant even spot women properly you dont belong on the women hate thread.