Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[saintJogger]

Also theres a section of femcels who are not really femcels but are just very progressive women, what the internet calls political lesbians who embrace political lesbianism.

Political lesbianism has to be the most peak femoid thing there is. Having sex you don't want with people you're not attracted to, just to own teh menz.

Also that nigga Morgan joined a facebook group for single in his cit and people made fun him. Some girls even wrote that they would rather fuck their dogs than him.

Ah, the fairer sex showing their most desirable trait, empathy, once again.

 

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

better than the brown pill. slightly

There's a difference!?

 

[There Is Light At The End]

There's a difference!?

One goes after another

 

[JamusActimus]

Ah, the fairer sex showing their most desirable trait, empathy, once again.

Empathy is mostly reserved for their children, family and desirable mates.

I also saw it being used in a performative way before also.

If a man is not desirable and not useful, he might as well be dead to a woman.

Here's him getting humiliated

 

[Bungdit Din]

I think youre a bit too used to glue eating hos and valueless vapid bitches.

All. Women. Are. Like. That. (Okay, okay, I'll allow that there may, arguably, perhaps be the remote possibility that there might, hypothetically, be a vanishingly slim chance of exceedingly rare exceptions existing - out there, undiscovered, somewhere - in theory, but fundamentally they're all the same. Problem is, they're not born - they have to be made. And, they don't make 'em like they used to).

I have a lot more hope in humanity that theyre more intelligent than this.

lol, why would you think that? Humanity is overwhelmingly retarded and, if we accept the (preposterous) notion that foids qualify as human (I know, but let's pretend for a moment), then women = retards. Not making any value judgements, either ('tards can be remarkably sweet, but they do require lifelong wrangling), it just is what it is.

In any case I wouldnt want any woman whos like this, whos obsessed with Chad

AWALT, again. Confronted with Chad, they all start frothing at the gash. That's simply their nature.

cause thats usually an indication of a deformed brain.

Compared to what? They are - literally - wired differently. And again, no judgement, only love, compassion and understanding.

Scorpions and frogs, bro.

 

[JamusActimus]

Morgan after giving up video games and cleaning his foreskin like anons online advised him to do..

 

[im5!XxhO]

Ah, the fairer sex showing their most desirable trait, empathy, once again.

If you have empathy, you know what hurts. I find it always funny when women cry about hate speech online considering the shit they say is insane as well. It's just that men are used to it and just tune it out. Whereas if they are on the receiving end it's another Pearl Harbor.

 

[Bungdit Din]

If you have empathy, you know what hurts. I find it always funny when women cry about hate speech online considering the shit they say is insane as well. It's just that men are used to it and just tune it out. Whereas if they are on the receiving end it's another Pearl Harbor.

Never gets old,

Unlike roasties.

 

[The Ugly One]

Well shucks, that sounds rather reasonable for a young woman with a stable job, a feminine disposition and her virginity intact. Sadly that's not what most women bring to the table, is it?
The latter is pretty much out of question if you find a woman on an app for hookups, social media has also told them it's okay to act like a womanchild because it's "empowering" and what woman would actually look for a job as long as she is being sponsored by her father and a dozen orbiters?
So I will ask once again since you seem to be hell bent on dodging the question: what would be the qualifications for men and women to be considered dating material? I'm sure you already realize the disparity between them which is the entire reason this thread exists.

If by "dating," you mean "finding a temporary partner for sterilized sex," who cares, but if you mean "finding someone to marry, then here is the minimum baseline:

For a woman:

1. Be under 30
2. Don't be uglier than the man
3. Don't be retarded

For a man:

1. Have your shit together financially
2. Have your shit together emotionally (do not come off as some sad sack who thinks a woman will fix his sad-sackness)
3. Have your shit together socially (i.e. have some friends, get out of the house)
4. Be physically strong

Morgan up there is ugly, but there are a few things he can do. One is pay for a decent haircut. Another is start wearing clothes that fit. An old, stretched-out video game T-shirt and a bad haircut say to women, "I do not have my shit together." And, of course, he can start working out.

 

[Wry]

That's cool and all but I thought modern women were supposed to be equal to men? What does it say about them if they don't meet the standards they set for their partner?

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

You are confusing nerds with autists. There is an overlap but they're not the same. The problem is the difference between male and female social dynamics and how either don't understand the other. That's half the problem, communication, the other half is just difference in expectations.

Women do not want companionship, that's just flagrantly false. If that were true then they wouldn't be so hostile to most men, they wouldn't be so close minded or insular. Since women are socialized in womens circles, they tend to adopt a lot of the attitudes of said women and most of their understanding of male socialization should generally come from the father or siblings, rarely from school/uni. Some of these womanly attitudes includes stuff like groupthink and body language communication. Most of woman infighting and aggression comes from body language (if you've seen women in your high school days you'll know) which is why a lot of them are not socialized to handle foul/aggressive language like men are. They way they express meanness and cruelty is vastly different, it's slow and a lot more psychological than just dumb physical aggression.

Part of the maturation process for women includes understanding male socialization and adjusting their expectations accordingly. Two things are inevitably pozzed in relation to that in the modern day. First being the girlboss political shit which is just other women with a variety of different problems and terrible life choices trying to turn young women into their pet projects, teaching them all sorts of nonsense. The second thing being the gay fag shit which is just the media and political landscape. Since women graduated in groupthink they always evaluate men in terms of groups, it's in part a survival mechanism for sure but on a philosophical basis its shitty, especially when they expect men not to do the same. So when there's 5 rapists out of a 100 they brand everybody a rapist, which sucks. Men on the other hand started to do the same as of late with the redpill stuff where there's 5 sluts out of a 100 and everybody's a slut. There's a ton of preconceived biases like that for both sexes due to socialization which are generally broken down with exploring gender relations. But women largely checked out of that process because of girlbossism, if men are being branded responsible for everything wrong and are going to be socially isolated/ostracised then the women are inevitably gonna turn their preconceived biases into reality. If they wanted companionship they would interact with men in an amicable manner, that risk has to be taken just like it is for men. Men take that risk more often because we're socialized to seek women and we're more committed to finding companionship than they are. It's also never been easier to do so considering the internet and shit, the massive communication gap and lack of risk taking ensures both parties lose out. In turn we don't brand women as bad on an individual basis unless they actively tried to make our lives worse. Women would brand most of their exes, even if they didn't do anything objectively objectionable as bad because they were incompatible, not because they had malicious intent.

In summary, women should just try to overcome their preconceived biases and try to interact with men more on a neutral basis, men should in part fix their act and cultivate positive behaviours, both parties need to bridge a cultural communication gap to fix their problems.

You just laid out all your own preconceived biases of women and ended this "analysis" with a conclusion that women are the ones with preconceived biases. Please consider hiring an editor or, alternatively, growing a frontal lobe.

 

[The Ugly One]

That's cool and all but I thought modern women were supposed to be equal to men? What does it say about them if they don't meet the standards they set for their partner?

Women aren't equal to men.

Unrelated, looks like women might be about to put Kamal in the White House. Women of every age prefer social destruction and economic chaos over mean tweets:

 

[Unyielding Stupidity]

I always enjoy it when people with 2024 join dates show up and are like "Uh this was always a feminist website chuds! fuck off back to /pol/"

The Kiwifarms of 2013/2014 would have given these people heart attacks. I absolutely no idea where people are getting this notion that this was some kind of progressive mecca before all teh poltards showed up.

People do the same with 4chan, insisting that early-mid 2000's 4chan was a progressive pro-tranny utopia, and that "muh chuds" are the reason the site's gone to shit.

To be perfectly charitable and fair to the whamen, I can sorta understand where theyre coming from. Im 200% sure if most men were given a 3/10 woman with belly fat, saggy tits, greasy hair, a big nose, hairy backside, no hygiene and glasses, they wouldnt take that (most of them anyways, Im sure there are guys out there who would love to pork pigs). Most men wouldnt date women who are in the Deathfats or Beauty Parlor section. Similarly most women dont get what they want from the 0-6 guys, granted some of them are fucking retarded with their ridiculous contradictory expectations but most of the time their expectations are logically sound and valid. All of sexual interactions always comes down to some form of market dynamics, its just that the market dynamics in this case are between two complementary and distinct parties who do not want to negotiate. Compromise seems to be the best course of solution.

Key difference is that for women, to meet the standards for being so ugly that no man would want you is absurdly difficult. Your example of an unfuckable woman has at least seven negative traits, multiple of which aren't even genetic and can be changed (poor hygeine, body hair and being fat). But even then, a woman like that would still get attention from men; the pig-woman experiment showed that even a fat, hairy, grotesquely-ugly woman who was photoshopped to resemble a pig was still capable of getting dozens of matches with men.
Meanwhile, simply being below 6 foot while being average or above in every other metric can be enough to disqualify you in the eyes of a not-insignificant amount of women, and that's something you can't change without extremely expensive surgery that also permanently cripples you.
There's a reason why on a large chunk of threads about a female lolcow on this site, at least one moderator will inevitably tell the users something along the lines of "please stop posting about how you want to fuck the lolcow"; I don't think this has ever happened in regards to a male lolcow.

Go to crystal.cafe, a lot of their stories are more believable and I'm sure there are a lot more normal non pozzed women on there than reddit, especially femcels. Never take research data or observations from reddit unless you're performing a study on the tranny demographic. Each social media platform has a different demographic and psychology they cater to, reddit caters to trannies and the hyper progressive herd of men and women droids who are not the baseline for normality.

Even if you ignore the fact that the majority of users on CC are larping trannies, almost every other user there either currently has a boyfriend, or has recently had a boyfriend. Compared to any incel space, where few if any of them have ever had a girlfriend at all, the difference is night and day.

 

[Georgio Cocklord]

All. Women. Are. Like. That. (Okay, okay, I'll allow that there may, arguably, perhaps be the remote possibility that there might, hypothetically, be a vanishingly slim chance of exceedingly rare exceptions existing - out there, undiscovered, somewhere - in theory, but fundamentally they're all the same. Problem is, they're not born - they have to be made. And, they don't make 'em like they used to).

lol, why would you think that? Humanity is overwhelmingly retarded and, if we accept the (preposterous) notion that foids qualify as human (I know, but let's pretend for a moment), then women = retards. Not making any value judgements, either ('tards can be remarkably sweet, but they do require lifelong wrangling), it just is what it is.

AWALT, again. Confronted with Chad, they all start frothing at the gash. That's simply their nature.

Compared to what? They are - literally - wired differently. And again, no judgement, only love, compassion and understanding.

Scorpions and frogs, bro.

I disagree, I feel like your opinion of women has been tainted by calisodomia but you do you I suppose.

You just laid out all your own preconceived biases of women and ended this "analysis" with a conclusion that women are the ones with preconceived biases. Please consider hiring an editor or, alternatively, growing a frontal lobe.

These are observations, not preconceived biases. I have female family members, I have teenagers in my family who have a venomous hatred of men just from cultural osmosis, the kind of people who would create a planet of the men situation. These are not teenagers who saw a rape statistics or got mistreated by men like the man hate thread claims, the worst they had was when their fathers said "women shouldnt drive" when they saw a shitty driver who happened to be a woman. Maybe it's just me but I wouldn't judge all of womenkind from lorena bobbitt or gone girl and I certainly wouldn't genocide them because one of them said "all men are rapists". You overestimate the charitability and strength of character women as a community have, I just like to study what made them this way behind fortified plexiglass. Ultimately both sides have their own faults, women certainly instigated the modern gender relations crisis but both parties are at fault and good communication is the only way to fix things.

That's cool and all but I thought modern women were supposed to be equal to men? What does it say about them if they don't meet the standards they set for their partner?

Women aren't equal to men.

Equality is a nebulous concept. Legal equality means a shared set of characteristics between two groups of people and same opportunities provided for both groups. It does not mean all characteristics are the same for both groups, that's sameness. Men and women are equal and opposite, in a word complementary. There's a set of shared characteristics and there's a set of complementary characteristics. In terms of dating expectations, it should have a similar composition of basic and additional requirements, the basic being analogus to same and additional being analogus to complementary.

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

These are observations, not preconceived biases. I have female family members, I have teenagers in my family who have a venomous hatred of men just from cultural osmosis, the kind of people who would create a planet of the men situation. These are not teenagers who saw a rape statistics or got mistreated by men like the man hate thread claims, the worst they had was when their fathers said "women shouldnt drive" when they saw a shitty driver who happened to be a woman. Maybe it's just me but I wouldn't judge all of womenkind from lorena bobbitt or gone girl and I certainly wouldn't genocide them because one of them said "all men are rapists". You overestimate the charitability and strength of character women as a community have, I just like to study what made them this way behind fortified plexiglass. Ultimately both sides have their own faults, women certainly instigated the modern gender relations crisis but both parties are at fault and good communication is the only way to fix things.

So your opinions of women are based on family members? Have you considered the possibility that your family is crazy and you should talk to other women?

 

[Georgio Cocklord]

So your opinions of women are based on family members? Have you considered the possibility that your family is crazy and you should talk to other women?

Not all of them are but some of them yes. Some of the women from uni are crazy as well. Women are of many demographics shapes and sizes, that's what I mean. But when it comes to coordination and socialization them embrace hive mind principles more than men do which is what I tried to say. Their insularity and averse/aversive behaviour is a result of closed socialization, men are not socialized like that at least no longer socialized in a homoerotic fashion with tribal ceremonies and rites of passage. Instead men are socialized by observation of the outside world and media. Women on the other hand are, if they are going to survive they need to fit in with other women and if they need to fit in they must be part of the hive mind at least for a brief period.

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

Not all of them are but some of them yes. Some of the women from uni are crazy as well. Women are of many demographics shapes and sizes, that's what I mean. But when it comes to coordination and socialization them embrace hive mind principles more than men do which is what I tried to say. Their insularity and averse/aversive behaviour is a result of closed socialization, men are not socialized like that at least no longer socialized in a homoerotic fashion with tribal ceremonies and rites of passage. Instead men are socialized by observation of the outside world and media. Women on the other hand are, if they are going to survive they need to fit in with other women and if they need to fit in they must be part of the hive mind at least for a brief period.

If your only samples are your family, university girls, and the Internet, then I think your sample is narrow.

Also, the fact that so many men post in this thread and repeat the same garbage is proof enough that men are capable of insular, hivemind socialization.

 

[Bungdit Din]

I disagree, I feel like your opinion of women has been tainted by calisodomia but you do you I suppose.

Da fuq is "calisodomia"? Was that a typo? [genuinely perplexed - google gives me nuthin'].

You do you too - but don't ever say you weren't warned. I guess sometimes, in order to take effect, the redpill needs to be administered as a suppository...

And, btw, wahmens aren't 'socialized' into being hive-minded herd animals, that's a result of their biology.

 

[The Ugly One]

Key difference is that for women, to meet the standards for being so ugly that no man would want you is absurdly difficult.

What do you mean by "want?" "Willing to go through the motions of feigning interest to get my dick wet?" Sure.

Meanwhile, simply being below 6 foot while being average or above in every other metric can be enough to disqualify you in the eyes of a not-insignificant amount of women, and that's something you can't change without extremely expensive surgery that also permanently cripples you.

Disqualify to whom? Whores who cruise fuck-match apps looking for this weekend's dick to ride? Sure.

The problem with this thinking is there is an enormous gulf between finding the person to have a family with and finding an ambulatory sex toy, and the people looking for the one aren't even the same people as the people looking for the other. Up thread, there was this 30-year-old tinder thot who was bummed an army boy she drove two hours to fuck didn't fuck her, but was still hopeful she might get his dick inside her. An important thing to notice about this story is that, while 5'10" David from IT isn't good for her, none of the girls that guy fucked were good enough for him to keep around, either. He ejaculated inside them a few times and discarded them for the next hookup.

 

[Male Idiot]

I don't think this has ever happened in regards to a male lolcow

That is not true if we look outside the farms.
Fiona the Suitress got wet for Chris Chan.
Ethan Ralph slampigged multiple babies.

To be Chad, you don't need to be good looking or hygenic. Look at Chris or Ralph. You need to be rich, famous, best if you are both.

You just have to be richer than 95% of the other men, or have another infamy angle like Tyrone and his side hustle, or Slammed the baby mauler pitbull.

It is just the modern woman lifestyle, it does not work like it worked for most of history. You can find the exceptions, but most of those are in your grandma's friend circle, so unless you are Chris Chan, not an option.

Otherwise you'll be passed on for a chance that Chad will settle for her, even if it is a lottery ticket's chance in hell.