Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 85 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 50 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 111 35.4%

  • Total voters
    314
The frustrating thing with narcissists is it's impossible to actually punish them because they'll never acknowledge they did anything wrong.
He'll keep doubling down, but I have no doubt he's suffering, his desperate cope and panicked attempts at gaslighting make it clear. He can't stand that people are not buying his bullshit and that's only us, wait until the court says "nah, you're an impotent balldo faggot".
Nick can't stand this. That's why he can't stop himself from trying to convince people on Twitter and during his streams, he is desperately trying to regain control. He's used to being the one who sets the narrative, his inability to shut up and strategize instead of throwing himself at the flames and flailing has been his undoing just as much as coke and degeneracy.
 
Aaron saying he bought the dress is so wild for me. "It is gaudy, I understand the criticism." That's a $900 prom dress you bought your wife in Vegas, lol.
To be clear, Aaron hasn't commented on the dress or anything really since the event, unless he is talking about it or will talk about it on his currently ongoing show (which I am not watching and cannot say), which he probably will.

I'm guessing this is a joke, but with a half dozen loosely related topics in the thread at a time it's easy for fake lore to be established. This post was very confusing to me because "It is gaudy, I understand the criticism." sounds exactly like how I would expect Aaron to cope about it.

There's no reason at this time to believe Rekieta didn't buy April an overpriced prom dress.


EDIT:
This thread is very hard to follow when people don't post the clips they are commenting on
 
Last edited:
To be clear, Aaron hasn't commented on the dress or anything really since the event, unless he is talking about it or will talk about it on his currently ongoing show (which I am not watching and cannot say), which he probably will.

I'm guessing this is a joke, but with a half dozen loosely related topics in the thread at a time it's easy for fake lore to be established. This post was very confusing to me because "It is gaudy, I understand the criticism." sounds exactly like how I would expect Aaron to cope about it.

There's no reason at this time to believe Rekieta didn't buy April an overpriced prom dress.
Aaron says he bought the dress in this video posted yesterday.

 
To be clear, Aaron hasn't commented on the dress or anything really since the event, unless he is talking about it or will talk about it on his currently ongoing show (which I am not watching and cannot say), which he probably will.

I'm guessing this is a joke, but with a half dozen loosely related topics in the thread at a time it's easy for fake lore to be established. This post was very confusing to me because "It is gaudy, I understand the criticism." sounds exactly like how I would expect Aaron to cope about it.

There's no reason at this time to believe Rekieta didn't buy April an overpriced prom dress.
Aaron did say that though, I saw a clip of the stream from yesterday I think. He scrolled back his phone pics to their vegas trip and said it was among the ones he bought her. He also said she looked much healthier then.
He didn’t show the pic but as usual I don’t expect he’s lying.

[edit - late, duh]
 
Last edited:
To be clear, Aaron hasn't commented on the dress or anything really since the event, unless he is talking about it or will talk about it on his currently ongoing show (which I am not watching and cannot say), which he probably will.

I'm guessing this is a joke, but with a half dozen loosely related topics in the thread at a time it's easy for fake lore to be established. This post was very confusing to me because "It is gaudy, I understand the criticism." sounds exactly like how I would expect Aaron to cope about it.

There's no reason at this time to believe Rekieta didn't buy April an overpriced prom dress.
Aaron says he bought the dress in this video posted yesterday.

Apparently he said it on a Steel Toe Member's only show on youtube last night (as referenced in the second quote). Aaron couldn't remember off-hand, so he looked it up in his photos, he paid $800 in Vegas for that dress, that April wore to H with Nick.

Nick can only give her a roof over her head and some drugs, and maybe a seat at an exclusive dinner. Anyone saying April isn't a whore/prostitute isn't paying attention. She likes shiny things, and will jump the minute she finds something else, or the money runs out, or things get hard.

Edit to add:
Update from this morning:
 
Last edited:
Aaron says he bought the dress in this video posted yesterday.

Thanks.

A search indicates that that clip wasn't posted in the thread before now.

I don't know why there would be a whole discussion about a clip where nobody discussing the topic posts the actual clip but whatever.

Arron did say that though, I saw a clip of the stream from yesterday I think. He scrolled back his phone pics to their vegas trip and said it was among the ones he bought her. He also said she looked much healthier then.
It would have been from the Sunday paid members only show he does which I forgot that he does because I don't pay Aaron.

Maybe there are way more STMS paid members posting here than I thought? :story:
 
Thanks.

A search indicates that that clip wasn't posted in the thread before now.

I don't know why there would be a whole discussion about a clip without posting the actual clip but whatever.


It would have been from the Sunday paid members only show he does which I forgot that he does because I don't pay Aaron.

Maybe there are way more STMS paid members posting here than I thought? :story:
If you make Aaron's streams live, there's about even odds you'll end up with a gifted membership. That's how I have seen "behind the boot". Another example, I've never paid for Kino Casino, but I've only gone a few days without being a member.

A-lawing is tough.

Flip side, from the intrepid Steel Toe fan in Willmar last week, there is a chance that some of the Steel Toe Army is joining the farms. At least one of their number is willing to press Ralph in public, which was more than any Farmers did (TO BE FAIR, at Null's request). Lord knows, Aaron talks about the Farms almost every day on his show (since at least the arrest).
 
He's going to have experience with how a falling out can influence people to share truths that they were previously willing to conceal.
People don't generally snitch on perps they like. They snitch either because they are personally afraid of prosecution or because they hate the son of a bitch. Maybe Nick's retard audience will view it as horrifying and shocking that (gasp!) one of the people reporting Nick also (gasp!) didn't like him very much. No judge will, though.
And in this case, regardless of anything with the video, THE COP WAS RIGHT!
Every single person who has seen the deranged cokestream basically said "By Jove, I do believe this gentleman is under the influence of COCAINE!" While it's nice to have a cop be able to say "As a member of the constabulary who has had experience with many cocaine enthusiasts over the years, this appears to be a man who has recently insufflated large amounts of the product of the coca leaf" it isn't really necessary.

Anyone seeing that video would reach the same conclusion. Nick is a delusional faggot.
 
Last edited:
If you make Aaron's streams live, there's about even odds you'll end up with a gifted membership. That's how I have seen "behind the boot". Another example, I've never paid for Kino Casino, but I've only gone a few days without being a member.

A-lawing is tough.

Flip side, from the intrepid Steel Toe fan in Willmar last week, there is a chance that some of the Steel Toe Army is joining the farms. At least one of their number is willing to press Ralph in public, which was more than any Farmers did (TO BE FAIR, at Null's request). Lord knows, Aaron talks about the Farms almost every day on his show (since at least the arrest).
The funniest thing is the guy wasn't even really pressing Ralph, he just wanted to say hi and the gunt shat his pants, shouldn't a celebrity of Ethan's caliber be used to people approaching him?
 
Every time I see your avatar(d) I wonder if Nick has mistaken the pug for a raccoon and beaten it to death with a hammer yet.

I often wonder if he's mistaken the pug for Kayla and given it a taste of the Balldo.

No tattoos, bruises or weird scratches.

She's flogging her golly on Onlyfans,
 
The funniest thing is the guy wasn't even really pressing Ralph, he just wanted to say hi and the gunt shat his pants, shouldn't a celebrity of Ethan's caliber be used to people approaching him?
Most of the people who would willingly come up to Ralph these days are likely alawgs, debt collectors, or process servers. There aren't many fans of the Killstream left. He's had to pay for every woman he's had since Meigh ran (and even then, was paying for some). Kayla wanted to be anywhere but near the gunt in that one photo.

I wonder what Nick's reaction would be if some rando came up to him while out on an errand to Sally's Tobacco #2 to pick up another hysterically funny can of some garbage energy drunk to mix with his whiskey? Would he rage? Would he tuck tail and bolt? Would he piss himself?
 
Talking publicly about details of the case? I'm definitely getting shades of Ty Beard here. It really does seem like Nick has gotten the lawyer he deserves!

If we are being fair, I believe this was BEFORE he was retained.

I am now curious how chummy Nick and White were before this case started. That also extends to Viva and Barnes.

Most of the speculations and inferences that are drawn RE: Nick's relarionships ans associations were taken from who he had on his show and whose shoes he appeared on--i.e. not that many. What appeared to be common sentiment was that he was isolated, but this might be a contraindicator. What did they talk about while Nick was blasted on drugs?

The only rational alternative to this that I can fathom is that Viva ans Barnes just jumped on a grift train for Nick content.

He's kind of mashing together two arguments; the cop lied and the footage was altered.

In order for the argument that Pomplum lied to work as far as the statement he made, you have to insert words he didn't say into the sentence, and argue that those extra words make it false in a way that was materially significant to the case. The other way they could show him lying is to produce the copy of the stream he watched and demonstrate that what he reported about it (Nick acting high as a kite and having white powder on his nose) were false. Good luck with that!

His conflation is part of the strategy--thus my assertion that he is employment a Chewbacca defense. He is also deliberately mis-characterising the basis for decisions and standards.

And as for the video being altered, my understanding is that Pomplum doesn't have to have watched a true and honest copy of the video in order to gain probable cause. He only had to believe that he was watching a true and honest copy, and then the search was authorized to verify whether or not the conclusions derived from that video were accurate. So, in order for Nick to successfully get the case thrown out based on the video being altered, it would have had to be altered to the extent that no reasonable person could believe that it accurately represented real events; like massive cuts, clear CGI suggesting it wasn't actually Nick pulling a DSP there at the end, some other voice dubbed in reading AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed's chat half a dozen times... A tiny watermark in the corner isn't going to do that. Even some blurry pixels from compression won't get you there, because a person could reasonably believe that the original video also had some blurry pixels.
Yeah Nick, as a lawyer, should know that 'probable cause' doesn't mean the crime has to already have been fully investigated and solved. It just has to be enough to justify checking the premises/vehicle/person to confirm or disprove the cop's suspicion.

And in this case, regardless of anything with the video, THE COP WAS RIGHT!

Continuing from above, yes, this is entirely correct. Pomplun just had to have a reasonable expectation to initiate the investigation and slightly more than that for the warrant. Trial standards are another matter. Nick seems to want to adjudicate this all now before any case can be mounted against him so that he can preemtively declare victory over an ill-prepared and half-formed case.

There are cases where the government does abuse their ability to obtain warrants and the like to obtain evidence used to levy charges, but by reasonable standards, this does not seem to be one.

For example, in the UK, they can now arrest people for memes, tweets, and other public statements that hurt people's feelings. Do I agree? No, but it is the law currently, and I cannot blithely ignore it. I have to work within the rules of the system until the rules change.

Nick seems to want to scream MUH LIBERTARIAN CONSTITOOSHUN! and be handed an automatic W. Under the rules as I understand them, Almost nothing was wrong with how the police conducted themselves. If Nick shows me any different evidence, I am open to reconsideration.
 
I've been thinking, though, of what the situation would have to look like in order for Nick's arguments for throwing out the search warrant to work. He's kind of mashing together two arguments; the cop lied and the footage was altered.
I guess, best case, but still very weak and not going to work: he could make the argument that the cop's training on magically knowing when someone is on cocaine and drunk and not just really drunk or on a legal stimulant and drunk is bullshit.
In all fairness that training probably is bullshit, cops are not human drug tests that can intuit the exact substances raging through your bloodstream. The state will probably uphold that the training is good because it is certified and all the cops have it so it must be good.
So then you have to pull up the behavioral criteria Nick would have to meet to be considered drunk and on illegal stimulants and not just drunk according to the cop's training. You have to show ways that the cop didn't comply with his training. And maybe you can make that argument: Nick is hardly energized, he's incoherent, he's nodding off on camera during his goon sesh, etc.
If the cop disregarded/didn't comply with the training that he claimed that he used to apply for the warrant you have a decent argument at reckless disregard for the truth for his application re: the cokestream. Getting passed-out sloppy on liquor on your own property is... not great parenting, and inadvisable, but it is not cause for the police to break down your door and go through your shit looking for cocaine.
I'm surprised we didn't see a pass at this yet, it's pretty close to the standard DWI attorney playbook re: breathalyzers. When was the cop last trained on how to do it right, when was it calibrated, is it all in complience with the dept. standards, etc. My guess is that you have to show Nick in a bad light and he won't tolerate that. We'll probably see it now. Hi Nick!
 
Aaron says he bought the dress in this video posted yesterday.

I feel like April would’ve been better suited to lean into the Tomboy Hunting gf on Instagram and grow a simp army than become the Balldo whore in tacky dress and tattoos. But, you know, can’t get easy access to drugs that way.
 
He also said it again on this mornings show!

If it really is as expensive as he says, holy tacky taste.

I’ll say it again, April looks like she got hit by a shovel as a child. Weird looking lady.
She’s one of those women who is decently attractive, and then BAM! One day in her thirties just hits the wall goddamn hard.

You can kinda tell in the latest pics how she’ll look like in 5-7 years, and it ain’t exactly encouraging.

Literally the most retarded thing she can do right now, is be the third wheel in a broken marriage. She needs to find some schlub who has more money than personality and get knocked up like yesterday.

(Not even talking about a rich guy: Just comfortably middle class. Shit, the manager of the local gas station will do.)
 
Back