Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

The problem with this thinking is there is an enormous gulf between finding the person to have a family with and finding an ambulatory sex toy
Let me stop you right there. Are you telling me women are going to marry someone they aren't sexually attracted to begin with? Not talking about rich oldfags who are about to kick the bucket or betas willing to have an "open relationship".
This level of delusion belongs in the man-hate thread.
 
Being a sociopath is a good short term dating strategy. Unnatural and possibly fanatical confidence will allow you to score. You don't need to be rich or anything, just disregard the consequences and take what you want.

Trouble is that strategy can fail spectacularly in the long-term because you either end up in jail or like Ralph (arguably worse). There's nothing more pathetic than an overweight, broke and drug addicted loser that still thinks he is the king. It's hard to tell whether that state is better or worse than the incel that never scored but isn't any of that.
 
Let me stop you right there. Are you telling me women are going to marry someone they aren't sexually attracted to begin with?

No. Are you illiterate?

This level of delusion belongs in the man-hate thread.

You seem to be replacing what I actually said with how you felt about some of the phrasing I used, very feminine behavior.
 
You seem to be replacing what I actually said with how you felt about some of the phrasing I used, very feminine behavior.
It's exactly what you meant unless you are implying that women looking for a quick fuck somehow have HIGHER standards than those looking for marriage. It's not looking good either way, chief.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Qonas
It's exactly what you meant unless you are implying that women looking for a quick fuck somehow have HIGHER standards than those looking for marriage. It's not looking good either way, chief.

Quote where I said that women marry people they aren't attracted to.
 
Well, why bother? Your politicians hate you with the full power of the state, women take you as a walking wallet, if you aren't rich or powerful...
...The west has fallen, and maybe it deserved to. Enjoy your games and trains and trolling. Let Slomo watch his company fall apart as jeets infest it.
Dude I'm sorry and I mean this with all your due respect but you're a faggot
 
Huh, weird, seems you can't find where I said the thing you say I said.

Anyway, the point I was making is that finding a spouse and finding the hottest fuck you can aren't the same thing. The confusion arises because men and women aren't the same, so the way a female 5 fucks a 10 and the way a male 5 fucks a 10 aren't the same. For the female, she needs to make a Tinder account, make it clear she has no self-respect, abandon any hope of companionship, and some good-looking guy who's bored and wants to get off without having to bother with even talking to the girl will eventually dip his stick in her. The way a male 5 fucks a 10 is to have a roll of cash, and he can bang some 22-year-old working on her psych master's. The only real difference is what each person has to give up to get what they want.

What I'm saying is that the male equivalent of the uggos using Tinder to sleep around is Russell Greer or Steven "boogie2988" Williams. And if you really envy the "ease" with which those chicks get sex, well, the door's open to being that same kind of person.
 
Meanwhile, simply being below 6 foot while being average or above in every other metric can be enough to disqualify you in the eyes of a not-insignificant amount of women, and that's something you can't change without extremely expensive surgery that also permanently cripples you.
Disqualify to whom? Whores who cruise fuck-match apps looking for this weekend's dick to ride? Sure.
If being 6' or less makes you invisible to whores, why would that exclude whores who are looking to settle down? Without physical attraction the marriage is doomed to fail and women are even encouraged to divorce if they have second thoughts one day.
Quote where I said that women marry people they aren't attracted to.
The problem with this thinking is there is an enormous gulf between finding the person to have a family with and finding an ambulatory sex toy, and the people looking for the one aren't even the same people as the people looking for the other.
The only way this is possible is if you live in some parallel world where marriage candidates are a separate group instead of being a subset of men women would want to fuck. Has it ever occurred to you that women are more likely to marry men who are already popular with the ladies?
If I had to explain it in even simpler terms I fear I would be insulting the intelligence of everyone reading this thread.
 
@Wry

You don't seem to be taking into account female dual mating strategy, aka, Alpha fucks, Beta bucks. There's the ['Alpha'] guy that elicits genuine, primal desire from her, and then there's the ['Beta'] guy for whom she may eventually, grudgingly settle - if she can't secure commitment from her first choice fuckboi, and she's run out of other, better options (usually due to hitting, or nearing, The Wall).

Fuckboi Chad, being popular with the ladies, is unlikely to settle for just one foid because (by definition) he has plenty of other options. So, wahmens may want to marry him, but he - being spoilt for choice by an abundant buffet of available pussy - is going to be reluctant to marry at all. Point is, Chad doesn't need to marry (or be 'in a relationship') in order to access sex, but non-Chads generally have to put themselves through the grueling humiliation ritual of courtship in order to secure some kind of relationship (as well as provide something other than raw sexual charisma) before being granted access to some hole.

Bitches will, under the right circumstances, jump on Chad's cock within five minutes of meeting him, and then, if they can, try to develop a more serious relationship from there. Whereas the same sluts will keep hapless Backup Betaboy Bob waiting for five weeks, five months, five years (or forever) before he's maybe rewarded with a passionless pity-fuck.

Ideally, wahmens want to marry the sexually exciting, physically attractive, tall, good looking, dangerous badboy, who's also faithful, financially responsible, good with children, and offers stability and security, but finding all these contradictory qualities in one man is nigh on impossible. The first set of characteristics is fine in the short term, whilst the second lot is more important (essential, even) for longer term commitment/marriage. So, she'll have her short term fun with a series of sexy assholes, then, when she's ready to retire from the cock carousel (or is forced off it, since she's no longer hot enough to attract a steady supply of Chads) she'll look for a longer term mate who can provide something more than a big dick and shattering orgasms. She's already experienced plenty of those anyway, so cocksmanship is of little importance in her husband, and sex will therefore be a low priority in the marriage. Of course, she's not going to tell him that - not until after she has the ring on her finger.
 
Ideally, wahmens want to marry the sexually exciting, physically attractive, tall, good looking, dangerous badboy, who's also faithful, financially responsible, good with children, and offers stability and security, but finding all these contradictory qualities in one man is nigh on impossible.

This isn't much different than men wanting to marry a woman who looks like their favorite porn star who isn't also a whore and is actually interested in them. She doesn't exist.

So, she'll have her short term fun with a series of sexy assholes, then, when she's ready to retire from the cock carousel (or is forced off it, since she's no longer hot enough to attract a steady supply of Chads) she'll look for a longer term mate who can provide something more than a big dick and shattering orgasms.

The woman who hops off the cock carousel into the arms of a waiting beta husband is sort of a myth. IIRC, the median number of sex partners married people have before marriage is much lower than the overall population. So as women become bigger and bigger sluts, they're more and more likely to stay lonely.
 
This isn't much different than men wanting to marry a woman who looks like their favorite porn star who isn't also a whore and is actually interested in them. She doesn't exist.
Oh, indeed. However, (the vast majority of non-Chad) men, unlike women, don't encounter a near inexhaustible supply of willing potential sexual partners, interested in them only for their bodies, queuing up with offers of no-strings action. Bitches, at least, get (the option to) to experience one half of the fuckfest equation, whilst (most) men get fuck all.

Not me, obviously, I'm beating them back with a shitty stick...
 
Oh, indeed. However, (the vast majority of non-Chad) men, unlike women, don't encounter a near inexhaustible supply of willing potential sexual partners, interested in them only for their bodies, queuing up with offers of no-strings action. Bitches, at least, get (the option to) to experience one half of the fuckfest equation, whilst (most) men get fuck all.

The vast majority of men do, however, encounter a near inexhaustible supply of willing potential sexual partners, interested in us only for our money, queueing up with offers of no-strings action. The male equivalent of tits is a wallet. Thing is, most guys just aren't actually that interested in whores.
 
Last edited:
Back