The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

OIG2.Z6kp8JwSacrjTvpJiXcI.jpeg
 
How did such a completely dickless nation become the second (or maybe even first now) most populous place on earth?

Is it really just rape all the way down?
Its in an earlier stage of the demographic transition than the west. Its not gonna continue forever, their birthrate is just barely at replacement and will go negative soon
 
I can totally see how a person that has at least a modicum of self-awareness will do their very best to not be confused with poo in loos.
To the nepalese thing i can only add that i met only one nepalese woman in my life and she was stunningly beautiful. She looked more chinese/mongolian instead of like some average poo skin, i always assumed they're all dark skinned like dravidians over there.
I only ever saw the Nepalese when I watched a documentary about the Ghurkas. 90% of them look like slightly darker-skinned Chinks and about 10% of them looked like Poojeets but with slanted eyes. From what I understand they're a multiethnic nation like India.
 
Not sure if this is what you were thinking of, or if there is some older source of the concept, but that describes a nu-who episode from a time when the pozz was becoming increasingly overt
That could very well be it. I remember enjoying David Tennant's time as the Doctor and sticking with his replacement longer than warranted out of a sense of hope it might get good again. It never did.
 
I only ever saw the Nepalese when I watched a documentary about the Ghurkas. 90% of them look like slightly darker-skinned Chinks and about 10% of them looked like Poojeets but with slanted eyes. From what I understand they're a multiethnic nation like India.
Nepalese are way closer to Asians further to the east than they are to poos.
Poojeet historical revision of Alexander's incursion into India is so funny. I first found out about it while looking up the Battle of Hydaspes historical battle in Rome Total War: Alexander on Youtube. The comments were flooded with coping Poojeets claiming that Alexander got redeemed and ran like a bitch with his tail tucked between his legs :story:
India is one of those places who got bitch-made by a lot of other nations but never managed to do it to another nation themselves.
 
If you look into it Poojeet historical sources they don't mention getting rekt by Alexander and they don't mention getting buck broken by the Persians either. And the latter is more egregious because the Persians went in way deeper than Alexander did, they controlled the entire Indus valley for over 2 centuries. Indians have been coping and sneeding about being someone else's bitch for over 2 millennia.

Persians carry their architecture wherever they go. If you look at the arches on any temple in Asia, their design is present. Jeetland has it too if you peel the crusted filth of the walls...

I only ever saw the Nepalese when I watched a documentary about the Ghurkas. 90% of them look like slightly darker-skinned Chinks and about 10% of them looked like Poojeets but with slanted eyes. From what I understand they're a multiethnic nation like India.

India also has those people in the north and eastern provinces. And Bollywood which is a Dravidian racial supremist vehicle will never cast them and actively denies their existence while claiming the land. When the next inevitable poo civil war comes, they will try to genocide those people.
 
Poojeet historical revision of Alexander's incursion into India is so funny. I first found out about it while looking up the Battle of Hydaspes historical battle in Rome Total War: Alexander on Youtube. The comments were flooded with coping Poojeets claiming that Alexander got redeemed and ran like a bitch with his tail tucked between his legs :story:
If anyone read this and was interested, it might have been this video:
The top comments are laughing at the jeets, who are, as Schlub says, really, really asshurt.
I will say Rome Remastered does look decent, and I do feel for the guy who made the video having to talk these double, triple, QUADRUPLE posting street shitters that they lost. And this guy obviously isn't some dude who just played the game and went with it, you can tell he looked into the battle, more than you can say of the "people" he's arguing with.
 
If anyone read this and was interested, it might have been this video:
The top comments are laughing at the jeets, who are, as Schlub says, really, really asshurt.
I will say Rome Remastered does look decent, and I do feel for the guy who made the video having to talk these double, triple, QUADRUPLE posting street shitters that they lost. And this guy obviously isn't some dude who just played the game and went with it, you can tell he looked into the battle, more than you can say of the "people" he's arguing with.
Yeah it was that one, I'm glad that the people who laugh at the Poos won out, when I watched it a year ago all the top comments were seething Poos.
 
Old but classic example of Poo's law no.1270182
View attachment 6356267
This is why Jeets will always be a joke race. They are incapable of differentiate between painting and a real woman :story:
Their only mindset was: Beautiful woman with bobs and vagene > Thirstposting > Gangrape IRL when a tourist travels to where they go.
 
If anyone read this and was interested, it might have been this video:
The top comments are laughing at the jeets, who are, as Schlub says, really, really asshurt.
I will say Rome Remastered does look decent.
Ya know ever since I was a child the whole "his troops turned on him and refused to fight any further" explanation for why Alexander stopped conquering and turned back never sat right with me.

Now knowing what I know of the pajeet however, I fully understand and sympathise why his troops were freaking the fuck out at the prospect of having to stay in India for any length of time.
 
Ya know ever since I was a child the whole "his troops turned on him and refused to fight any further" explanation for why Alexander stopped conquering and turned back never sat right with me.

Now knowing what I know of the pajeet however, I fully understand and sympathise why his troops were freaking the fuck out at the prospect of having to stay in India for any length of time.
On the one hand, I understand, but if Alex and the Greeks would have taken India, would the world be a better place?
 
Muslims are cringe but they are (mostly) white and the living conditions there aren't to the extreme levels of India

Muslim are semites enforcing slave morality onto half of their population and allowing childish but deadly tantrums in the name of said religion in the other, what are you on? The only parts that are white are parts that we let Islam colonize and should be taking back.

I agree with what you said about india but why are you like this about this inbred "society"
 
I agree with what you said about india but why are you like this about this inbred "society"
Because muslims generally stick to their own countries, but when they come over here they can eventually integrate once they see America is better. They do shit up their own space in their country but that's fine if they want to stick to there. Indians don't, they have completely shit up India and overflow everywhere else that's white, and they never ever ever integrate and just try to re-create India elsewhere despite having fled from it.

I'm also aware of how muslim countries are obsessed with terrorism because of Islam, and to that I'd say that what Indians are doing is basically terrorism for business. You can legally shoot a terrorist doing terrorist shit, you can't legally shoot someone at a business.
 
Because muslims generally stick to their own countries, but when they come over here they can eventually integrate once they see America is better. They do shit up their own space in their country but that's fine if they want to stick to there. Indians don't, they have completely shit up India and overflow everywhere else that's white, and they never ever ever integrate and just try to re-create India elsewhere despite having fled from it.

I'm also aware of how muslim countries are obsessed with terrorism because of Islam, and to that I'd say that what Indians are doing is basically terrorism for business. You can legally shoot a terrorist doing terrorist shit, you can't legally shoot someone at a business.
Dunno if this is bait but I'll throw out the summary of the copypasta bout Muzzies and percentages.

Muzzies are a minority = peaceful
Muzzies get way bigger as a population = They start demanding privileges such as Halal food (guaranteeing jobs) and reaching out to the disaffected to show them the light of Islam
Muzzies become massive = No-go zones, hair trigger rioting will take place. They'll keep on going until they become the majority and will move towards to installing Shariah law.
Muzzies are a majority = Everything is Muzzie. They have their religious schools, the non Muzzies are taxed and society is truly under Islam. However, there is no real peace here as the puritans will kill disbelievers over the slightest of offences.

Remember, Taqiyya is a practice. All of the stuff I described can be seen in countries infected by Muzzies. Philippines being the easiest example because you can see all of these taking place in various parts of the country.
 
Because muslims generally stick to their own countries, but when they come over here they can eventually integrate once they see America is better. They do shit up their own space in their country but that's fine if they want to stick to there. Indians don't, they have completely shit up India and overflow everywhere else that's white, and they never ever ever integrate and just try to re-create India elsewhere despite having fled from it.

I'm also aware of how muslim countries are obsessed with terrorism because of Islam, and to that I'd say that what Indians are doing is basically terrorism for business. You can legally shoot a terrorist doing terrorist shit, you can't legally shoot someone at a business.
Honestly I think your principles are coming from a good place but you're making the common westerner mistake of not recognizing how theocracies differ from democracies.

On the people:
The religion is being used to control a people who are morally extremely indian (wrt scams, laziness, rapes, and other emotionally unstable antisocial behaviour).

If this behaviour is genetic or simply deeply culturally engrained is irrelevant. this is how the vast majority are. this is why america lost afganistan. A democratic middle east without islam would look like india.

All the muslim "cultural contributions" were Persian, not Arab. Once the arabs took over they stole it.

On theocracies:
They're an existential hazard for democracies, and wrt Islam, every active muslim or cultural islamist is complicit. It's not easy for them to shake it off because it's all the utopianism of communism, but they don't even have to be rewarded in this life.
That this is the best way to control them in their countries is also irrelevant. As soon as they're a noteable part of the population, the utopianism of the religion kicks in, and they collaborate to turn the country they're in into another shithole. See britian/europe.

Some societies function fine without a sincere religion and I will be very happy for arabs when they instate that in their own countries, but they're advocating for their values to be enacted in the West, with the men shitting up online gender dialogue and the women engaging in lib politics. This sort of control is a downgrade for western society.

Sorry for shitting up the india thread with islamposting. feel free to reply to me in the designated thread.
 
Back