- Joined
- Jul 26, 2024
Even more fundamental than that, his prose is uniquely bad, in a way that's going make it like armor against casual readership. He could take those various petty grudges and give them to someone who doesn't try to win writing by cramming as many clauses as humanly possible into sentences, and that would probably be some reasonably entertaining stories.That's clearly his attempted angle, but if left to his own devices, he would never be able to like....expand the scope of that in a way that would draw a readership (a ghost writer could do this!). No matter how hard he tries to intellectualize and generalize his points, it's going to boil down to him being paranoid and just going over personal grudges. I guess he will try to work in his "Academic Freedom and Abortions Now!" thing that he's been trying to make happen for years, turn it into a manifesto about why academia must burn. I hope he makes a million dollars.
I'm hoping he puts the book out and burns his bridges, but it remains as obscure as his previous books. And then someone else puts out a Berkeley Tell-All that includes a number of the same incidents from a slightly different perspective (perhaps even has Joe as a frequently recurring character), that gets some good sales numbers because they're able to write with a reader in mind.
And then Joe stews.