US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
The videos consist of the family members pretty much shitting on Kamala Harris & Co. for trying to demonize Trump for visiting the families of the deceased, blaming the current administration for their deaths.

I hope they can finally shut the fuck up about the altercation and take the loss, knowing how dumb they are however, I doubt so.
They won't.

The mainstream media will not cover this side at all. The narrative is Drumph disrespected sacred ground with a political stunt. End of story.

This gets back to something I said a month ago: Kamala is campaigning in a Post Truth World. She and her campaign simply declare things to be so. If confronted on an obvious lie, she doubles down as if it's fact. She was always for fracking. She was always for building The Wall and high border security. Trump hates the military. She never wanted to defund the police. She was never part of the failed Biden Administration. They can read her own words back to her and she'll just ignore them. This. IS. The. Strategy.

And the mainstream media hates Trump so much, they will carry water for her, back her up, and keep simping for her. They are all still personally invested in Defeating Hitler that they can do nothing else. They know she lies. They know electing her is electing a shadowy group of neocons, advisors, and interns who will puppet her. They don't care. Because Trump is Hitler.
 
The only real chance Dems had to maybe do any notable steering of the ship was the Sunday when Biden threw the towel in. For a brief 24 hours it wasn't quite locked in that Kamala had the full blessing, they could of gotten someone else to throw their hat into the ring. But the question is ,who would of stepped up if it wasn't Kamala? I think most Dems don't want to take over Biden's hot mess - preferring to aim for 2028 instead.
The best bet democrats had for a strong candidate was an open convention. Let fresh, unknown (at least on a national stage) people at a go at it on the convention floor. Making arguments for this or that part of the party and the policies they want to see enacted. A meritocratic free-for-all where a charismatic, intelligent and visionary candidate would come out on top. Such a person would be ten times the person Kamala is.

Even if such an individual does not win in November, this election was a write-off anyway. The upsides are plentiful, at the very least being legitimacy of the candidate. A person the people of the party voted for. The only downsides are the fact the inner cabal of the party doesn't/didn't have direct say over who was running in such a scenario. It's dumb the inner party chose this path, instead of allowing for a democrat Trump to take hold of the reins for an election, but it is the path they chose. I can't wait for the down ballot slaughter that is going to come in November because of this shortsightedness.
 
If you have an insurance you can expect around 3 k.
....
I can go on . But making being pregnant one ticket to the poor house and losing everything you worked for will make any woman pull that coathanger faster than you say abortion.

3k is about 150 average 20 dollar McDonalds' meals these days. Or 600 Grande Lattes from Starbux. Maybe american bitches need to stop being so fucking fat. And somehow nigger bitches on a 800/month stipend manage to pump out kids and not go any further into the poorhouse than they already are. Your math is whack and you have zero life experience.
 
3k is about 150 average 20 dollar McDonalds' meals these days. Or 600 Grande Lattes from Starbux. Maybe american bitches need to stop being so fucking fat. And somehow nigger bitches on a 800/month stipend manage to pump out kids and not go any further into the poorhouse than they already are. Your math is whack and you have zero life experience.
We really will use anything other than metric, won't we?
 
I have three kids and my wife is pregnant with our fourth. A lot of the economics of raising children is based on extreme scenarios that are fucking retarded. It assumes that every birth is extremely complicated and that your wife will almost die. Then your kid will require only the latest and greatest baby furniture and if you reuse a crib or a car seat, you are a negligent parent. Each one of your kids needs an iPad and needs a new one every year. Your kid just can’t go play in the park, they need to be on a peewee team or squad that costs over $20k a year and travel all over the country. I can go on.

Basically you have to assume the <1% scenario will happen every single time. Your wife will have some issue that happens one in a billion times, then some pregnancy issue that happened once in 1973 to some random woman, and then assume your lithe white wife will encounter the same complications as some 400 pound negress who smoked and drank all throughout her pregnancy because muh tabula rasa. In the end, the odds of all these happening collectively are like 1 in 500 billion but because they happen once in a while, it absolutely will happen to your woman. So better just not get pregnant and advocate for open borders.
 
The best bet democrats had for a strong candidate was an open convention. Let fresh, unknown (at least on a national stage) people at a go at it on the convention floor. Making arguments for this or that part of the party and the policies they want to see enacted. A meritocratic free-for-all where a charismatic, intelligent and visionary candidate would come out on top. Such a person would be ten times the person Kamala is.

Even if such an individual does not win in November, this election was a write-off anyway. The upsides are plentiful, at the very least being legitimacy of the candidate. A person the people of the party voted for. The only downsides are the fact the inner cabal of the party doesn't/didn't have direct say over who was running in such a scenario. It's dumb the inner party chose this path, instead of allowing for a democrat Trump to take hold of the reins for an election, but it is the path they chose.
This is 2020 all over again. Democrats can nominate whoever they feel like because they control the media and culture. An actually intelligent and visionary candidate is bad for the deep state, since they have their own ideas how to run things and will make a power base once they're out of office that will challenge the Clintons, Obama, etc. Kamala is a great candidate since she's stupid but has the twofer wahman+POC boost to fight attacks and internally isn't obviously just Obama's Fourth Term like Big Mike would be. Any Democrat who doesn't like that system now doesn't have a candidate like RFK Jr. to vote for, so it's either vote Jill Stein or Cornel West or hold your nose and vote Democrat.

Blank slate candidates like Kamala are great for the powers that be, since as long as she shuts up and doesn't give anything but vague statements, she can be anything from the good unifying moderate Democrat we need to beat Drumpf to the progressive who will bring socialism to America.
I can't wait for the down ballot slaughter that is going to come in November because of this shortsightedness.
Not gonna happen. They'll just rig a couple of House/Senate races and gain that thin majority they need. Just like 2022.
 
I think the reason the pendulum is swinging back on abortion is that it's a lot easier to convince people of the value of "abortion on demand without apology" when your society has orphanages full of kids who cannot find a home.

It's also because jamming scissors in a live, 8-month-gestational baby's head and sucking its brains out with a tube is ghoulish and vile. By openly, vocally, aggressively doubling down on the most extreme, ghoulish, vile positions they can, the left eventually triggers a reaction. It's like how with fagshit, they can't just stop at allowing fags to get married, they have to march through the streets in fetish gear and pee on each other. Or like how with troons, they want it to be legal for a troon to rape a girl in a bathroom and for you to be charged with terrorism if you complain.
 
I haven't been paying attention to politics for a few days now. Anything I new happened? Kamala dodging the public still?
Nothing real has happened or changed.
Recall that Hillary’s strategy in 2016 was to do anything possible to run out the clock. Hillary’s campaign staff even admitted as such in interviews.
 
It's also because jamming scissors in a live, 8-month-gestational baby's head and sucking its brains out with a tube is ghoulish and vile. By openly, vocally, aggressively doubling down on the most extreme, ghoulish, vile positions they can, the left eventually triggers a reaction. It's like how with fagshit, they can't just stop at allowing fags to get married, they have to march through the streets in fetish gear and pee on each other. Or like how with troons, they want it to be legal for a troon to rape a girl in a bathroom and for you to be charged with terrorism if you complain.
That's because they've been taken over by the cult of progress, and progress means you always have to be pushing towards less bigotry, more acceptance, because that's how you keep the donations and power coming make the world a better place. They literally can't define an end to their crusade. Everyone MUST be racist, forever, without any possibility to redemption or innocence because the alternative means there's an endpoint to reach, and that goes against the idea of progress. Eternal, never ending, constant progress towards a nebulous, never defined goal of "more leftward."

And when the rest of us finally get tired of constantly being told we need to allow more batshit shit -- "people can't help being attracted to children so it's an immutable characteristic and thus it's bigotry to discriminate against them," "it takes a community so parental rights are absurd," "blacks are eternal victims and thus it's racist to arrest or put them on trial, even if they do break laws. Don't we owe them for slavery?" -- the snapback, the pushback, the collective rest of culture telling them to fuck off will only prove that yes, you see, the world IS a bigoted horrible place, therefore, we need to restart work on progress. Only harder. More progress. Forever.
 
Not gonna happen. They'll just rig a couple of House/Senate races and gain that thin majority they need. Just like 2022.
If they can rig enough house/senate races to avoid losing control of congress, why can't they also rig the presidential race?
 
If they can rig enough house/senate races to avoid losing control of congress, why can't they also rig the presidential race?
Its theoretically possible to have operatives in position to flip house seats (those are per district elections) but not to flip the presidency. Senate flipping is same level of work as presidency so if you can do one you can do the other.

Think Fulton county and pulling ballots to scan under the desk. Additionally if you think watching them matters you focus stopping it in some place like Fulton but an otherwise competitive seat in the suburbs gets lost.

Its very edge case you would go for one and not the other. A true believer who believes they have to cheat "to save democracy" will do full blue down ticket.

Also Whitmer, Newsom, and Shapiro would love Kamala to lose but a legislative that will completely block Trump. Best scenario for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back