Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I love that the support is on the basis of "circumstances of birth", and not any policies or accomplishments.The following video has 0% testosterone in it:
View attachment 6369751
Nothing says "love" like aborting a pregnancy because it's an inconvenience."Make America Love Again"... Are you shitting me. Politicians have no concept of loving anyone but themselves. To imply Democrats care about the people they wish to lead really gets under my skin.
Both shows taught me valuable lessons. Like beware blondes with russian accents, flexible brunette gymnasts and the dangers of pink lipstick on them both.I watched it as a kid and didn't gleam a damn thing from it. It was also on around the same time as Power Rangers, and that was way more popular.
They won't.The videos consist of the family members pretty much shitting on Kamala Harris & Co. for trying to demonize Trump for visiting the families of the deceased, blaming the current administration for their deaths.
I hope they can finally shut the fuck up about the altercation and take the loss, knowing how dumb they are however, I doubt so.
The best bet democrats had for a strong candidate was an open convention. Let fresh, unknown (at least on a national stage) people at a go at it on the convention floor. Making arguments for this or that part of the party and the policies they want to see enacted. A meritocratic free-for-all where a charismatic, intelligent and visionary candidate would come out on top. Such a person would be ten times the person Kamala is.The only real chance Dems had to maybe do any notable steering of the ship was the Sunday when Biden threw the towel in. For a brief 24 hours it wasn't quite locked in that Kamala had the full blessing, they could of gotten someone else to throw their hat into the ring. But the question is ,who would of stepped up if it wasn't Kamala? I think most Dems don't want to take over Biden's hot mess - preferring to aim for 2028 instead.
If you have an insurance you can expect around 3 k.
....
I can go on . But making being pregnant one ticket to the poor house and losing everything you worked for will make any woman pull that coathanger faster than you say abortion.
We really will use anything other than metric, won't we?3k is about 150 average 20 dollar McDonalds' meals these days. Or 600 Grande Lattes from Starbux. Maybe american bitches need to stop being so fucking fat. And somehow nigger bitches on a 800/month stipend manage to pump out kids and not go any further into the poorhouse than they already are. Your math is whack and you have zero life experience.
This is 2020 all over again. Democrats can nominate whoever they feel like because they control the media and culture. An actually intelligent and visionary candidate is bad for the deep state, since they have their own ideas how to run things and will make a power base once they're out of office that will challenge the Clintons, Obama, etc. Kamala is a great candidate since she's stupid but has the twofer wahman+POC boost to fight attacks and internally isn't obviously just Obama's Fourth Term like Big Mike would be. Any Democrat who doesn't like that system now doesn't have a candidate like RFK Jr. to vote for, so it's either vote Jill Stein or Cornel West or hold your nose and vote Democrat.The best bet democrats had for a strong candidate was an open convention. Let fresh, unknown (at least on a national stage) people at a go at it on the convention floor. Making arguments for this or that part of the party and the policies they want to see enacted. A meritocratic free-for-all where a charismatic, intelligent and visionary candidate would come out on top. Such a person would be ten times the person Kamala is.
Even if such an individual does not win in November, this election was a write-off anyway. The upsides are plentiful, at the very least being legitimacy of the candidate. A person the people of the party voted for. The only downsides are the fact the inner cabal of the party doesn't/didn't have direct say over who was running in such a scenario. It's dumb the inner party chose this path, instead of allowing for a democrat Trump to take hold of the reins for an election, but it is the path they chose.
Not gonna happen. They'll just rig a couple of House/Senate races and gain that thin majority they need. Just like 2022.I can't wait for the down ballot slaughter that is going to come in November because of this shortsightedness.
I think the reason the pendulum is swinging back on abortion is that it's a lot easier to convince people of the value of "abortion on demand without apology" when your society has orphanages full of kids who cannot find a home.
Nothing real has happened or changed.I haven't been paying attention to politics for a few days now. Anything I knew happened? Kamala dodging the public still?
I haven't been paying attention to politics for a few days now. Anything I new happened? Kamala dodging the public still?
Recall that Hillary’s strategy in 2016 was to do anything possible to run out the clock. Hillary’s campaign staff even admitted as such in interviews.Nothing real has happened or changed.
The following video has 0% testosterone in it:
View attachment 6369751
That's because they've been taken over by the cult of progress, and progress means you always have to be pushing towards less bigotry, more acceptance, because that's how youIt's also because jamming scissors in a live, 8-month-gestational baby's head and sucking its brains out with a tube is ghoulish and vile. By openly, vocally, aggressively doubling down on the most extreme, ghoulish, vile positions they can, the left eventually triggers a reaction. It's like how with fagshit, they can't just stop at allowing fags to get married, they have to march through the streets in fetish gear and pee on each other. Or like how with troons, they want it to be legal for a troon to rape a girl in a bathroom and for you to be charged with terrorism if you complain.
If they can rig enough house/senate races to avoid losing control of congress, why can't they also rig the presidential race?Not gonna happen. They'll just rig a couple of House/Senate races and gain that thin majority they need. Just like 2022.
Its theoretically possible to have operatives in position to flip house seats (those are per district elections) but not to flip the presidency. Senate flipping is same level of work as presidency so if you can do one you can do the other.If they can rig enough house/senate races to avoid losing control of congress, why can't they also rig the presidential race?
and your evidence of this is?Also Whitmer, Newsom, and Shapiro would love Kamala to lose but a legislative that will completely block Trump. Best scenario for them.