Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Semantics aside, my point remains. Nips shouldn't be illegal. I agree with Nick, they're all a buncha Scandiwhovian prude incels!!!

OK, though Scandinavia is ackshually one of the most liberal regions for female toplessness. Must be those Catholic German influences in MN

Trivia;
In the US, see here and here for state laws (for display, not for dissemination). Talk to TN, UT*, NC, PA, and/or NJ (the two sources above have conflicting info).
* should have been legal after 10th Circuit ruling in 2019 but a couple of women were prosecuted in 2022, and my time/interest for digging into this has expired so idk!

All that aside, whether or not permitted to be displayed, boobs are still considered as intimate or private. And if you wonder why, the answer is "show bobs and vagene."

Food for thought: This could be a true statement by Aaron in an attempt to be slick, since he may have not "received" the nude over Signal. He may have been the one taking it (after filling her with cock meat while Nick peaked through the door).
View attachment 6372397

if so, even stronger case for its private nature

Most of these stupid laws are stupidly drafted. Also this particular law appears overtly transphobic. What Scandinavian incel bigots!

I like to be snide about drafting fuck-ups, and I spend a lot of time explaining why X needs to be changed bc it's wrong or confusing after 50 people have signed off on it...but I'm now the one writing/rewriting 50 things that need to stand up to regulatory and audit (and everything short of that) scrutiny, and I'm near-paralyzed trying to project forward how they will be read. Shoe's on the other foot now, serves me right!

I'm not sure that entire statute isn't facially unconstitutional. It's absurdly broad.

In Casillas the MN Supreme Court found it Constitutional.

 

[Shig O'nella]

Harassment is intended for kinda of Aaron had sent the Pic to her stepfather and said "Doesn't your stepdaughter have great tits" after a relationship break down.

Oh, I agree with your take, but I can see a grey area that could be used - showing it to a couple of her friends who she (presumably) hasn't peeled down in front of ain't a lot different from showing it to her stepfather. It's more a who Aaron showed the pic to than that he showed the pic at all situation.
Either way, Aaron should just cop to it for being a general shitbag.
A gentleman never tells is a good rule to follow.

 

[LiquidKid]

I can only repeat.
Farmers MISSED NOTHING.
Token said: Motion in limine.
Judge said: Motion in Limine.
State Did NOT agree to NOT use April's Bodycam.
STATE did NOT agree any miranda rights were violated [which is what Boss Baby Barnes CRIED in a girly voice about and what JUNKIE claimed in his motion and his post omnibus stream, I thought].
STATE merely Agreed Ape's statements outside of court are hearsay. YET if u think about it EVERYTHING outside of court is all hearsay in actuality. SO NOT A MISS by anybody, Farmer or Lawyer.

Goberment Spectator AND AnOminus ALSO posted that Ape's BODYCAMS can be used but will be decided in later, closer to trial, Motion In Limine and/or should ape testify whether SPECIFIC statements will be WHITE Noised out of her bodycam [as was done with darrel brooks girlfriend bodycam]. NICK LIED in his Post-omnibus junkie freak-out stream.

Additionally, as another post here NOTED that even Ape's attorney FAILED to mention these alleged Violation of Miranda Rights....!!!!
Miranda right?
Not Mentioned at the get????
NOBODY Finds that glaring????

Bottom Line: Nick lied POST Omnibus and WITHOUT Kiwi Farmers present we would not have known about Ape's MOTION IN LIMINE. Farmers=1. Junkie=negative 400 lies.

Farmers Missed Nothing AND added GREAT people details. The idea to STOP farmer attendance is assinine. I bet they improve with every future attendance and become even better reporters BUT ALSO they shall become better non-practicing attorneys-- even better than JUNKIE himself.

Jesus Christ. 1. They owed no one anything. 2. They acquitted themselves well. 3. They were not or were not there in capacities as lawyers. 4. They provided milk, and, even better, a nice little vignette and human side-story. 5. The transcript was out fast enough. 6. Speculation is half the fun.

I think neither of you paid attention to what I actually said.
I praised them and said I was grateful, and in no way did I say they shouldn’t have been there. Just that they left out a key aspect. There’s nothing wrong with pointing out a short coming.

 

[AnOminous]

What I'm looking forward to the most in Aaron's revenge porn trial is when Nick, as a witness, starts furiously signaling the prosecutor and then, when the prosecutor chooses to ignore him, jumps up from his chair screaming, "Objection!" at some perfectly acceptable question.

And then is immediately asked by the judge "Are you firing your lawyer? Do you now wish to represent yourself?" And either he sits the fuck down and shuts the fuck up or he gets immediately ass-raped.

And if his response is this:

Then the ass-rape commences immediately.

 

[StannisTheMannis]

Does disseminating snow angels pics classify as revenge porn? In Alaska, definitely.

 

[LiquidKid]

And then is immediately asked by the judge "Are you firing your lawyer? Do you now wish to represent yourself?" And either he sits the fuck down and shuts the fuck up or he gets immediately ass-raped.

And if his response is this:
View attachment 6372570
Then the ass-rape commences immediately.

Nick somehow getting a contempt charge from someone else’s criminal trial would be hilarious, but I sadly doubt we will ever get to this point

 

[The Internet Dick]

There’s nothing wrong with pointing out a short coming.

"Shortcoming" is one word. Glad I took the time to point it out and share my eagle-eyed catch with the rest of the site. Not annoying at all.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

Oh, I agree with your take, but I can see a grey area that could be used - showing it to a couple of her friends who she (presumably) hasn't peeled down in front of ain't a lot different from showing it to her stepfather. It's more a who Aaron showed the pic to than that he showed the pic at all situation.
Either way, Aaron should just cop to it for being a general shitbag.
A gentleman never tells is a good rule to follow.

Fairly sure Keanu and Geno didn't know Kayla. Sure, know of.

April was the Keanu connection

 

[AnOminous]

"Shortcoming" is one word. Glad I took the time to point it out and share my eagle-eyed catch with the rest of the site. Not annoying at all.

Didn't Kayla claim she never came from Nick fucking her? I bet she didn't even if she didn't say it, probably because one of his shortcomings was short comings. As in, he was a minute man. In both senses. He took only a minute to coom and on top of that his dick was minute, in the other pronunciation.

That's why he needed the Balldo. But nobody wants a Balldo. It's just a bizarre device nobody actually wants. That's why when Nick introduced it into his content, people rapidly lost interest in Nick. Because who would use a Balldo? A BALLDO MAN. That is to say, a pathetic, cucked, ridiculous individual worthy of nothing but mockery.

 

[Red Frida]

You might enjoy this piece that focuses on the opposing natures of Yakov and Eisav, starting in the womb, and how their mother Rivkah tried to make sense of what it was all about and what God wanted from her.

Typical kike bullshit. How can anyone possibly tell which twin within a womb is agitating? The story is bullshit you might as well be referencing Harry Potter rather than argue whether the legacy was sold for beans under duress or not when the whole thing is an obvious fabrication.

 

[Can of Spam]

I know I missed Nick doing something retarded because the thread jumped another 250 pages since I last checked it. Let's see..

In the last 24 hours Nick has admitted:

-It was cocaine in his bedroom
-He reads Kiwi Farms regularly
-The polycule rumors are true
-He snitched on Aaron to the cops
-Kayla was sending nudes to other men (Nick is a cuck)

Anything else?

Fun fact: Nick is calling it a WIN that he's admitted to being a CUCK. His ex, his gay lover, Aaron, is now facing charges for NICK BEING A CUCK. Aaron cucked Nick. He's now charged with CUCKING NICK.

And NICK is the one who snitched him out for CUCKING him. Nick has literally ADMITTED to being a CUCK!

Some other dude literally had naked pics of his whore wife. That makes him a CUCK!

LMAO! CUCK CUCK CUCK!

NICK IS A CUCK!

NICK IS A CUCK!

He's pled to being a CUCK. He is now a proven CUCK!

Id rather be fat than a cuck

Nick might end up becoming both

Goddammit please STOP DOING THIS. Not just you, EVERYONE. There is no FUCKING H IN "CUCKOLD." WHY DO YOU PEOPLE DO THIS?

Chuckold's Cuck and Suck

Nope. Nothing new here. Just Aaron's cuck slowing becoming Our Cuck.

 

[AnOminous]

Nope. Nothing new here. Just Aaron's cuck slowing becoming Our Cuck.

Imagine being so absolutely brain-charred from cocaine that you think admitting to being a cuck is a win somehow.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

Imagine being so absolutely brain-charred from cocaine that you think admitting to being a cuck is a win somehow.

Nick is claiming admitting to the pics isn't admitting to the relationship. Yup...

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Reading the statute, the harassment part makes no sense.

"the actor disseminates the image with intent to harass the person depicted in the image;" Aaron was boasting.

Hmm? In what way can Aaron sharing that photo with Geno be said to be with the intention to harass Kayla?

Reading the charges it looks to me like the investigating officer is trying to say it is a symptom of an harassment campaign, but harassment like that is a separate crime anyway and using that logic Aaron discussing Nick and April is harassment also. He was certainly saying worse stuff about them.

So I'll go out in the limb and predict that harassment aspect is dropped at some point and the Nick cope will be epic.

I haven't really commented on the felony charge directly (not sure I even read the charges; if I did it was a skim); I don't know which subsection they're relying on for the felony charge. But if it's the harassment subsection,

(c) "Harass" means an act that would cause a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of a reasonable person.

(617.261, subd. 7).

So that's a fight about whether sending the pic to Geno was sent with intent to cause that kind of harm to Kayla. Not seeing it. My read is he was just being a twirp, bragging and being disrespectful and spiteful, but idr anything suggesting an intent to cause her pain or fear. But query what an intent to "cause a substantial adverse effect on the[...]privacy of a reasonable person" even means.

But fwiw since you mentioned the separate crime of harassment, harassment for purposes of a restraining order (609.74 is defined to include a single instance of dissemination of an intimate image.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick is claiming admitting to the pics isn't admitting to the relationship. Yup...

Cuck logic. Coke logic.

It doesn't fool anyone of 3 digit IQ. Maybe it works on his profoundly retarded current unironic "fans."

 

[smarty_snoops]

Interesting matter of public record... NICK REKIETA IS A CUCK!

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Imagine being so absolutely brain-charred from cocaine that you think admitting to being a cuck is a win somehow.

Nick has taken such pains to avoid revealing why Aaron has a problem with him that he must be foolish enough to believe he can keep the truth about his swinging a secret. Would he cop a plea to avoid having to make it public record in Kandiyohi County (it’s now on the record in Stearns County) that he and his wife were in a sexual relationship with April and Aaron?

I can’t wait to find out.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I think neither of you paid attention to what I actually said.
I praised them and said I was grateful, and in no way did I say they shouldn’t have been there. Just that they left out a key aspect. There’s nothing wrong with pointing out a short coming.

I paid attention. My point was it wasn't a shortcoming.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

I haven't really commented on the felony charge directly (not sure I even read the charges; if I did it was a skim); I don't know which subsection they're relying on for the felony charge. But if it's the harassment subsection,



(617.261, subd. 7).

So that's a fight about whether sending the pic to Geno was sent with intent to cause that kind of harm to Kayla. Not seeing it. My read is he was just being a twirp, bragging and being disrespectful and spiteful, but idr anything suggesting an intent to cause her pain or fear. But query what an intent to "cause a substantial adverse effect on the[...]privacy of a reasonable person" even means.

But fwiw since you mentioned the separate crime of harassment, harassment for purposes of a restraining order (609.74 is defined to include a single instance of dissemination of an intimate image.

I think they are aiming for a gag order.

However if you define misdemeanor as essentially sending an imagine one time to a person and then say sharing an imaging is automatically harassment, why then spell it out as harassment as an upgrade to felony in the statute? Has to be a standard for it.

 

[LiquidKid]

Nick is claiming admitting to the pics isn't admitting to the relationship. Yup...

Then how does he explain how he got it?
“Aggressively monogamous men not in a swinging relationship” don’t randomly share nudes of their wife to other men.
As for the harassment angle, I wonder if they reached that because Aaron sent it to Geno live on stream so he could react to it live on stream